Abstract
According to pioneers of design thinking, innovations should satisfy three perspectives: human desirability, technical feasibility, and economic viability. Analyses of SAP's innovation projects indicate that design thinking has effectively addressed both technical feasibility and desirability, but not economic viability. Hence, SAP has developed an innovation approach that focuses on economic viability and is compatible with design thinking via business model innovation (BMI). Addressing economic viability within innovation projects by calculating business cases early on and by creating detailed business plans at a later stage is not enough. It requires an approach like BMI that puts economic viability to the very core of innovation throughout the entire process. The focus on the business model forces the team members involved to center their thoughts and ideas on value creation for the identified customer groups and even more on value capture throughout the entire process from analysis to implementation. The investigation of a possible combination of design thinking and SAP's BMI approach indicates that both approaches have many similarities that facilitate close integration, and that both approaches can benefit from each other when fitting elements from one are integrated into the other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Afuah A, Tucci C (2000) Internet business models and strategies: text and cases. McGraw-Hill, New York
Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 86:84–92
Bucherer E, Eisert U, Gassmann O (2012) Towards systematic business model innovation: lessons from product innovation management. Creativity Innov Manage 21:183–198
Chesbrough H (2009) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plann. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
Gassmann O, Csik M, Frankenberger K (2012) Aus alt mach neu: Ein Fahrplan für Innovationen. Harv Bus Manage 34:18–19, 06/2012
IDEO (2012) Human centered design, an introduction, 2nd edn. Available at: http://www.ideo.com/images/uploads/hcd_toolkit/HCD_INTRO_PDF_WEB_opt.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2012
Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2005) Blue ocean strategy how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Linder J, Cantrell S (2000) Changing business models: surveying the landscape. Working paper. Technical report, Accenture Institute for Strategic Change
Morris M, Schindehutte M, Allen J (2005) The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. J Bus Res 58(6):726–735
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci C (2005) Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun Ass Inform Syst (CAIS) 16(1):1–25
Schief M, Buxmann P (2012) Business models in the software industry. In: Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 3328–3337
Vianna M, Vianna Y, Adler I, Lucena B, Russo B (2012) Design thinking: business innovation. MJV Press, Rio de Janeiro
Weiblen T, Giessmann A, Bonakdar A, Eisert U (2012) Leveraging the software ecosystem: towards a business model framework for marketplaces. In: Procedings of the 9th international joint conference on e-business and telecommunications (ICETE), pp 187–193
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eisert, U. (2014). SAP: Bringing Economic Viability to the Front End of Innovation. In: Gassmann, O., Schweitzer, F. (eds) Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01055-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01056-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)