Abstract
Rather than constituting only a new method in the context of innovation that can help foster a business, crowdsourcing represents a new way of structuring and organizing work by relying on the principles of evolution, swarm intelligence and analog knowledge, self-selection, and task distribution and aggregation. More and more companies try to leverage the distributed intelligence of their customers, suppliers, employees, and internet users by setting up crowdsourcing platforms and broadcasting their problems and tasks to the internal and external crowd. Although crowdsourcing has become quite popular, it also faces some difficulties that must be overcome in order to provide value. The lack of a clear task description and problem explanation, of an appealing platform design, solid terms and constrains of participation, or of a fair price structure may create difficulties for companies applying crowdsourcing. But, once they have gained the relevant knowledge, companies can truly benefit from crowdsourcing and develop superior innovations.
No matter who you are, most of the smartest people work for someone else. (Bill Jo, co-founder of Sun Microsystems, 1990)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“The Mechanical Turk is a crowdsourcing Internet marketplace that enables computer programmers (known as requesters) to co-ordinate the use of human intelligence to perform tasks that computers are currently unable to do. The Requesters are able to post tasks known as HITs (Human Intelligence Tasks), such as choosing the best photo of a store front from among several photographs, writing product descriptions, or identifying performers on music CDs. Workers (called providers in Mechanical Turk’s Terms of Service, or, more colloquially, turkers) can then browse among existing tasks and complete them for a monetary payment set by the Requester.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Mechanical_Turk
References
Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design rules: vol. 1. The power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge
Becker GS, Murphy KM (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs and knowledge. Quart J Econ CVII:1137–1160
Bernoff J, Li C (2008) Harnessing the power of the Oh-So-Social web. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 49(3):36–42
Füller J (2006) Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated by producers. Adv Consum Res 33(1):639–646
Füller J (2010) Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. Calif Manage Rev 52(2):98–122
Glass RL (1995) Software creativity. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35:519–530
Hayek FA (1978) The mirage of social justice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing: how the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. The Crown Publishing Group, New York
Hutter K, Hautz J, Füller J, Mueller J, Matzler K (2011) Communitition: the tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity Innov Manage 20:3–21
IBM (2008) Welcome to the IBM Jam events page. https://www.collaborationjam.com/. Accessed 25 Nov 2011
Innocentive (2012a) Crowdsource your innovation challenge – improve the way you innovate & work – become an innoCentive solver. https://www.innocentive.com/. Accessed 15 Mar 2009
Innocentive (2012b) Measuring weight of live animals. https://www.innocentive.com/ar/challenge/9932863. Accessed 20 Jan 2012
Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Econ Policy 17:248–264
Kohler T, Füller J, Matzler K, Stieger D (2011) Co-creation in virtual worlds: the design of the user experience. MIS Quart 35(3):773–788
Lakhani KR, Jeppesen LB (2007) Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harv Bus Rev 85(5):30–32
Lakhani KR, Garvin DA, Lonstein E (2011) TopCoder (A): developing software through crowdsourcing (TN). Harvard Business School Case, 610–032
Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JA (2000) Case study of open source software development: the apache server. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering, pp 263–272
Page SE (2007) The difference – how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princton University Press, Princeton
Raymond ES (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol
Stats IW (2012) Internet world stats – usage and population statistics. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2012
Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nation. Abacus, London
Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics – how mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin Group, New York
Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Manage Sci 54(9):1529–1543
Wikipedia (2012) About wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. Accessed 31 Dec 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Füller, J., Lemmer, S., Hutter, K. (2014). Crowdsourcing: How Social Media and the Wisdom of the Crowd Change Future Companies. In: Gassmann, O., Schweitzer, F. (eds) Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01055-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01056-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)