Crowdsourcing: How Social Media and the Wisdom of the Crowd Change Future Companies



Rather than constituting only a new method in the context of innovation that can help foster a business, crowdsourcing represents a new way of structuring and organizing work by relying on the principles of evolution, swarm intelligence and analog knowledge, self-selection, and task distribution and aggregation. More and more companies try to leverage the distributed intelligence of their customers, suppliers, employees, and internet users by setting up crowdsourcing platforms and broadcasting their problems and tasks to the internal and external crowd. Although crowdsourcing has become quite popular, it also faces some difficulties that must be overcome in order to provide value. The lack of a clear task description and problem explanation, of an appealing platform design, solid terms and constrains of participation, or of a fair price structure may create difficulties for companies applying crowdsourcing. But, once they have gained the relevant knowledge, companies can truly benefit from crowdsourcing and develop superior innovations.


  1. Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design rules: vol. 1. The power of modularity. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker GS, Murphy KM (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs and knowledge. Quart J Econ CVII:1137–1160Google Scholar
  3. Bernoff J, Li C (2008) Harnessing the power of the Oh-So-Social web. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 49(3):36–42Google Scholar
  4. Füller J (2006) Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated by producers. Adv Consum Res 33(1):639–646Google Scholar
  5. Füller J (2010) Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. Calif Manage Rev 52(2):98–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glass RL (1995) Software creativity. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35:519–530Google Scholar
  8. Hayek FA (1978) The mirage of social justice. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing: how the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. The Crown Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hutter K, Hautz J, Füller J, Mueller J, Matzler K (2011) Communitition: the tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity Innov Manage 20:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IBM (2008) Welcome to the IBM Jam events page. Accessed 25 Nov 2011
  12. Innocentive (2012a) Crowdsource your innovation challenge – improve the way you innovate & work – become an innoCentive solver. Accessed 15 Mar 2009
  13. Innocentive (2012b) Measuring weight of live animals. Accessed 20 Jan 2012
  14. Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Econ Policy 17:248–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohler T, Füller J, Matzler K, Stieger D (2011) Co-creation in virtual worlds: the design of the user experience. MIS Quart 35(3):773–788Google Scholar
  16. Lakhani KR, Jeppesen LB (2007) Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harv Bus Rev 85(5):30–32Google Scholar
  17. Lakhani KR, Garvin DA, Lonstein E (2011) TopCoder (A): developing software through crowdsourcing (TN). Harvard Business School Case, 610–032Google Scholar
  18. Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JA (2000) Case study of open source software development: the apache server. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering, pp 263–272Google Scholar
  19. Page SE (2007) The difference – how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Raymond ES (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Musings on linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates, SebastopolGoogle Scholar
  21. Stats IW (2012) Internet world stats – usage and population statistics. Accessed 22 Nov 2012
  22. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nation. Abacus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Tapscott D, Williams AD (2006) Wikinomics – how mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Manage Sci 54(9):1529–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wikipedia (2012) About wikipedia. Accessed 31 Dec 2012

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hyve AGMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Strategic Management, Marketing and TourismUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations