Abstract
Systematic monitoring is indispensable for a thorough water and soil management. However, large data sets with many variables, natural heterogeneities, and a variety of (possible) influencing factors require new approaches for processing and visualization of the data. A variety of advanced techniques has been developed recently in different disciplines. Some of them have been tested for application in water and soil resources management and exhibited very promising results. Two out of these approaches are presented here by application to a data set of shallow groundwater quality that has been complied during a five years period in a small catchment in Northeast Germany. Measured variables of soil or water quality usually reflect effects of various processes. On the other hand, single processes usually affect more than one variable and thus generate a characteristic “fingerprint” that can be used in an inverse approach to identify this process based on observed measured variables. Other processes differ with respect to their “fingerprints” and thus can be differentiated in a large data set. This is the basic idea of applying dimensionality reduction approaches. Every single sample can be ascribed a score of a component that is a quantitative measure for the impact of the respective process on the given sample. Usually, a small number of components (or processes, respectively) accounts for a large fraction of the variance in a data set with many variables. This “dimensionality reduction” helps a lot to gain better understanding of the prevailing processes, of spatial and temporal patterns, and of the reasons for conspicuous data. The larger a given data set, and the larger the number of variables, the more advanced methods of data visualization are required. Modern visualization techniques pave the way for efficient use of the most powerful interface between data stored on a computer and the human brain. A single non-linear projection of high-dimensional data on a two-dimensional graph provides comprehensive information about outliers, clusters, linear and non-linear relationships, spatial patterns, multivariate trends, etc. in the data. This approach could usefully be combined with other dimensionality reduction techniques. This chapter can serve only as an appetizer. A variety of sophisticated new methods exist. These techniques still are not part of textbooks of hydrology or soil science. They require an open mind and some initial training. Then a wealth of powerful tools are at hand as a base for thorough water and soil resources management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fernandes PG, Carreira P, da Silva MO (2006) Identification of anthropogenic features through application of principal component analysis to hydrochemical data from the Sines coastal aquifer, SW Portugal. Math Geol 38:765–780
Gámez AJ, Zhou CS, Timmermann A, Kurths J (2004) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction in climate data. Non-linear Process Geophys 11:393–398
Gupta AK, Sinha S, Basant A, Singh KP (2006) Multivariate analysis of selected metals in agricultural soil receiving UASB treated tannery effluent at Jajmau, Kanpur (India). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79:577–582
Haag I, Westrich B (2002) Processes governing river water quality identified by principal component analysis. Hydrol Process 16:3113–3130
Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol 30, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Langer U, Rinklebe J (2009) Lipid biomarkers for assessment of microbial communities in floodplain soils of the Elbe River (Germany). Wetlands 29:353–362
Lee JA, Verleysen M (2007) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Information science and statistics. Springer, Berlin
Lewandowski J, Lischeid G, Nützmann G (2009) Drivers of water level fluctuations and hydrological exchange between groundwater and surface water at the lowland River Spree (Germany): field study and statistical analyses. Hydrol Process 23:2117–2128. doi:10.1002/hyp.7277
Lischeid G (2009) Non-linear visualization and analysis of large water quality data sets: a model-free basis for efficient monitoring and risk assessment. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:977–990. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0266-y
Lischeid G, Bittersohl J (2008) Tracing biogeochemical processes in stream water and groundwater using nonlinear statistics. J Hydrol 357:11–28. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.013
Lischeid G, Kalettka T (2012) Grasping the heterogeneity of kettle hole water quality in Northeast Germany. Hydrobiologia 689(1):63–77. doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0764-7
Lischeid G, Natkhin M, Steidl J, Dietrich O, Dannowski R, Merz C (2010) Assessing coupling between lakes and layered aquifers in a complex Pleistocene landscape based on water level dynamics. Adv Water Resour 33:1331–1339. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.08.002
Longuevergne L, Florsch N, Elsass P (2007) Extracting coherent regional information from local measurements with Karhunen-Loève transform: case study of an alluvial aquifer (Rhine valley, France and Germany). Water Resour Res 43:W04430. doi:10.1029/2006WR005000
Mahecha M, Martínez A, Lischeid G, Beck E (2007) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction as a new ordination approach for extracting and visualizing biodiversity patterns in tropical montane forest vegetation data. Ecol Inf 2:138–149. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.05.002
Muller M (2012) From raw data to informed decisions. In: WWAP (World Water Assessment Programme): The United Nations World water development report 4: Managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris, UNESCO, Chap. 6, pp 157–173
Sammon JW (1969) A nonlinear mapping for data structure analysis. IEEE Trans Comput C-18/5:401–409
Schilli C, Lischeid G, Rinklebe J (2010) What processes prevail? Analyzing long-term soil-solution monitoring data using nonlinear statistics. Geoderma 158:412–420. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.06.014
R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, http://www.Rproject.org
Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V, Langford JC (2000) A global geometric framework for non-linear dimensionality reduction. Science 290:2319–2323
Thomas B, Lischeid G, Steidl J, Dannowski R (2012) Regional catchment classification with respect to low flow risk in a Pleistocene landscape. J Hydrol 475:392–402. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.020
Thyne G, Guler C, Poeter E (2004) Sequential analysis of hydrochemical data for watershed characterization. Ground Water 42:711–723
Weyer C, Lischeid G, Aquilina L, Pierson-Wickmann A-C, Martin C (2008) Mineralogical sources of the buffer capacity in a granite catchment determined by strontium isotopes. Appl Geochem 23:2888–2905
Zhang HB, Luo YM, Wong MH, Zhao QG, Zhang GL (2007) Concentrations and possible sources of polychlorinated biphenyls in the soils of Hong Kong. Geoderma 138:244–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lischeid, G. (2014). Non-Linear Approaches to Assess Water and Soil Quality. In: Mueller, L., Saparov, A., Lischeid, G. (eds) Novel Measurement and Assessment Tools for Monitoring and Management of Land and Water Resources in Agricultural Landscapes of Central Asia. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01017-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01017-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01016-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01017-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)