Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)
In this chapter we discuss the concept of governance paths and the forms of dependency marking paths. The forms of dependency constitute rigidities in governance evolution, but leave space for flexibility, for path creation.
KeywordsPath Dependency Informal Institution Shared Vision Local Governance Autopoietic System
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
- Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–165). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Eggertsson, T. (2005). Imperfect institutions: Possibilities and limits of reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: lectures at the College de France, 1975–76. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland (2d ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Shtaltovna, A., Van Assche, K., & Hornidge, A. K. (2013). Where did this debt come from? Organizational change, role ambiguity and development in rural Khorezm, Uzbekistan. International Quarterly for Asian Studies. Internationales Asienforum 43(3–4), 179–197.Google Scholar
- Teampau, P., & Van Assche, K. (2007). Sulina, the dying city in a vital region. Social memory and nostalgia for the European future. Ethnologia Balkanica, 11(1), 257–278.Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2014