Advertisement

Introduction

  • Kristof Van AsscheEmail author
  • Raoul Beunen
  • Martijn Duineveld
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)

Abstract

Understanding change has become one of the most important challenges for contemporary governance and its theories. The global economic crisis has shown that researchers and practitioners in many different fields and disciplines face great difficulties in understanding and explaining unexpected events and changes in our society. An insufficient grasp of the different mechanisms that drive the evolution of governance, a partial and often ideological view of the interplay between these mechanisms sustain this void of knowledge and expertise.

Keywords

Formal Institution Environmental Justice Informal Institution Social Engineering Representative Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allina–Pisano, J. (2008). Post soviet potemkin villages. Politics and property rights in the black earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allmendinger, P. (2001). Planning in postmodern times. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Beunen, R. (2010). The governance of nature: How nature conservation ambitions have been dashed in planning practices. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  4. Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kornai, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (Eds.). (2004). Building a trustworthy state in post-socialist transition. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  9. Leman, J. (Ed.). (2000). The dynamics of emerging ethnicities: Immigrant and indigenous ethnogenesis in confrontation. Frankfurt: Peter Land.Google Scholar
  10. Ligrom, P., North, D., & Weingast, B. (1990). The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges and the champagine fairs. Economics and Politics, 2(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luhmann, N. (1997). Die gesellschaft der gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. Machiavelli, N. (1988). The prince. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and social orders. a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.Google Scholar
  14. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics, and the state. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1979). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland (2d edn.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Van Assche, K. (2008). Va‘Amenez- nous les citoyens et incluez-les!’ Les chemins tortueux de la participation citoyenne dans les theories et les pratiques de l’urbanisme contemporain. In M. Hubert & F. Delmotte (Eds.), La cite administrative de l’etat a la croisee des chemins. Des enjeux pour la ville et l’action publique a Bruxelles. Brussels: Editions La Cambre.Google Scholar
  22. Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012a). Formal/informal dialectics and the self-transformation of spatial planning systems: An exploration. Administration and Society (online first).Google Scholar
  23. Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., Beunen, R., & Teampau, P. (2011). Delineating locals: Transformations of knowledge/power and the governance of the Danube Delta. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 13(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verdery, K. (2003). The vanishing hectare: Property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristof Van Assche
    • 1
    Email author
  • Raoul Beunen
    • 1
  • Martijn Duineveld
    • 2
  1. 1.Strategic CommunicationWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Cultural GeographyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations