Advertisement

Real-Time Analysis of Non-stationary and Complex Network Related Data for Injection Attempts Detection

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 223)

Abstract

The growing use of cloud services, increased number of users, novel mobile operating systems and changes in network infrastructures that connect devices create novel challenges for cyber security. In order to counter arising threats, network security mechanisms and protection schemes also evolve and use sophisticated sensors and methods. The drawback is that the more sensors (probes) are applied and the more information they acquire, the volume of data to process grows significantly. In this paper, we present real-time network data analysis mechanism. We also show the results for SQL Injection Attacks detection.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Applied Research Programme (PBS) of the National Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) funds allocated for the Research Project number PBS1/A3/14/2012 (SECOR)).

References

  1. 1.
    CERT Polska Annual Report. http://www.cert.pl/PDF/Report_CP_2011.pdf (2011)
  2. 2.
    SOPHOS homepage http://www.sophos.com
  3. 3.
    Cisco Annual Report (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OWASP Top 10 2010, The Ten Most Critical Web Application Security Risks (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Royal Navy Website Attacked by Romanian Hacker. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11711478 (2008)
  6. 6.
    Mills, E.: DSL Reports Says Member Information Stolen (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keizer, G.: Huge Web Hack Attack Infects 500,000 pages (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, T.K., Kum, G.Y., Reddy, E.K., Sharma, M.: Major issues of web applications: a case study of SQL injection. J. Curr. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2(1), 16–20 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Halfond, W., Orso, A.: AMNESIA: analysis and monitoring for neutralizing SQL-injection attacks. Proceedings of the 20th IEEEACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tajpour, A., JorJor Zade Shooshtari, M.: Evaluation of SQL injection detection and prevention techniques. In: CICSyN 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and, Networks (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amirtahmasebi, K., Jalalinia, S.R., Khadem, S.: A survey of SQL injection defense mechanisms. In: ICITST International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured, Transactions (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elia, I.A., Fonseca, J., Vieira, M.: Comparing SQL injection detection tools using attack injection: an experimental study. In: 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Software, Reliability Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kruegel, C., Toth, T., Kirda, E.: Service specific anomaly detection for network intrusion detection. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied, Computing, pp. 201–208 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choraś, M., Kozik, R., Puchalski, D., Holubowicz, W.: Correlation approach for SQL injection attacks detection. In: Herrero, A. et al. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 189, pp. 177–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.D.: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. (1970)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conrad, E.: Detecting Spam with Genetic Regular Expressions. SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITTI Ltd.PoznańPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Telecommunications, UT&LS BydgoszczBydgoszczPoland

Personalised recommendations