Advertisement

The Rhetoric of Instructional Design Cases: Knowledge Building Via Examples of Process and Product

  • Craig D. HowardEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations book series (ECTII)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a venue created for the express purpose of capturing precedent contained in instructional designs, a scholarly journal: the International Journal of Designs for Learning (IJDL). I briefly address editorial practices the journal has explored with developing reviewers and then take a closer look at five problem areas authors have grappled with when writing designs cases about learning interventions. The chapter is written from the vantage point of the assistant editor, who edited, reviewed, and coordinated the reviews of design cases over a period of 2 years while also writing his own design case (International Journal of Designs for Learning. 2010;1(1)). The areas of concern common among reviews for these publications shed light on how the design case is developing into a rigorous form of educational inquiry. Those areas are (a) situating the design; (b) describing the design; (c) depicting the experience of the design; (d) developing trustworthiness through transparency, analysis, and reflection; and (e) removing aspects of design cases which confound their purpose. Specific examples from design cases that have gone through peer review describe how instructional designers may approach the dissemination of design precedent through the careful documentation of pedagogical designs.

Keywords

Design case Case studies Design process Instructional design Design methods Pedagogical design Publication Precedent 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study would not have been possible without the support of the many good-natured reviewers and authors of design cases at the Tech Trends’ feature the “ID Portfolio,” and the International Journal of Designs for Learning (IJDL). Colin Gray, Nate Prestopnik, and Gordon Rowland graciously provided their communications from within the editorial process to help make this article possible. Portions of this article appeared in IJDL in 2011, and are reprinted here under the creative commons licence: Howard, C.D. (2011). Writing and rewriting the instructional design case: A view from two sides. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 40–55. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index. Copyright © 2011, Creative Commons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ .

References

  1. Boling, E. (2010). The need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledge. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
  2. Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2008). Exploring standards of rigor for design cases. Paper presented at the Design Research Society Conference Undisciplined! Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.Google Scholar
  5. Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  6. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Fanselow, J. F. (1987). Breaking rules: Generating and exploring alternatives in language teaching. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, Z. (2008). Chillout song. Zefrank.com. Retrieved September 23, 2011, from http://zefrank.com/chillout.
  9. Hosack, B. (2010). VideoANT: Extending online video annotation beyond content delivery. Tech Trends, 54(3), 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard, C. D., Boling, E., Rowland, G., & Smith, K. M. (2012). Instructional design cases and why we need them. Educational Technology, 52(3), 34–38.Google Scholar
  11. Howard, C. D., & Myers, R. D. (2010). Creating video-annotated discussions: An asychronous alternative. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), multimedia: http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
  12. Howard, C.D. & Myers, R.D. (2011, April). A design case: Creating a video annotated teaching observation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  13. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mulcahy, R. S. (2011). Bottom line: Defining success in the creation of a business simulation. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  16. Newby, T. J., Ertmer, P. A., & Kenney, E. M. (2010). The INSITE Project: Engaging Students In International Team Collaborations to Create a Web 2.0 Tool Repository. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 21–39. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
  17. Parrish, P. (2006). Design as storytelling. TechTrends, 50(4), 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paulus, T., & Spence, M. (2010). Using blogs to identify misconceptions in a large undergraduate nutrition course. TechTrends, 54(5), 62–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prestopnik, N., & Foley, A. (2012). Visualizing the past: The design of a temporally enabled map for presentation (TEMPO). International Journal of Designs for Learning, 3(1), 52–60. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index
  20. Rowland, G. (2007). Educational inquiry in transition: Research and design. Educational Technology, 47(2), 14–28.Google Scholar
  21. Rowland, G., Hamilton, J., & Morales, M. (2011). The IICC project: Integration, insight, creativity, and character. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 18–39. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.
  22. Smith, K. M. (2010). Producing the rigorous design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  23. Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  24. Tracey, M. W., & Unger, K. L. (2010). Cross cultural instruction: An instructional design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 1(1), multimedia. http://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/index.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A & M UniversityTexarkanaUSA

Personalised recommendations