Advertisement

Multi-Disciplinary Constraint Design Optimization Based on Progressive Meta-Model Method for Vehicle Body Structure

  • S. J. HeoEmail author
  • I. H. Kim
  • D. O. Kang
  • W. Y. Ki
  • S. M. H. Darwish
  • W. C. Choi
  • H. J. Yim
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 43)

Abstract

In order to design a vehicle body with high strength and high stiffness, a multi-disciplinary design process should include careful consideration of multi-disciplinary design constraints to properly account for vehicle static stiffness (bending/torsional), durability, Noise/Vibration/Harshness (NVH), crash worthiness, light weight vehicle structure during the early stage of vehicle design process. With this approach, fast development of new vehicle body structures can be achieved with minimal number of iterations to match the conflicting design goals from each discipline. In the current research, a multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO) based on a meta model is developed and refined to apply for the design of body structure. In an effort to apply the MDO for vehicle body structure, 4 phase procedures were established in the current research. In Phase I, a base model is created. In Phase II, an effect analysis is carried out. In Phase III, a meta model is created. Finally in Phase IV, using the optimization algorithm, the meta model created in Phase III is eventually refined through the process of optimization. In this research, static stiffness (bending / torsional), dynamic stiffness (1st torsion mode) were used for constrained conditions and the mass minimization was the object function for optimization.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the International Collaborative Research Project between KSU and KMU and by the MKE (The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the CITRC (Convergence Information Technology Research Center) support program (NIPA-2012-H0401-12-2003) supervised by the NIPA(National IT Industry Promotion Agency).

References

  1. 1.
    Londhe, A., Kalani, D., Ali, A.: A systematic approach for weight reduction of BIW panels through optimization. SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0389 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mundoa, D., Hadjitb, R., Dondersb, S., Brughmansb, M., Masb, P., Desmetc, W.: Simplified modelling of joints and beam-like structures for BIW optimization in a concept phase of the vehicle design process. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 45(6–7), 456–462 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jang, G.W., Choi, Y.M., Choi, G.J.: Discrete thickness optimization of an automobile body by using the continuous-variable-based method. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 22, 41–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, B.J., Kim, M.S., Heo, S.J.: Aluminum space frame B.I.W. optimization considering multidisciplinary design constrains. Trans. KSAE 14(1), 1–7 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kodiyalam, S., Yang, R.J., Gu, L., Tho, C.H.: Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle system in a scalable, high performance computing environment. Struct. Multi. Optim. 26(3–4), 256–263 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deb, A., Chou, C., Dutta, U., Gunti, S.: Practical versus RSM-based MDO in vehicle body design. SAE Technical Paper 2012–01-0098 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao, Y., Feng, H., Gao, D., Xu, R.: Multidisciplinary design optimization of a hatchback structure. SAE Technical Paper 2012–01-0780 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, R., Chuang, C., Fu, Y.: An effective optimization strategy for structural weight reduction. SAE Technical Paper 2010–01-0647 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    EasyDesign Training Guide: Institute of design optimization, Republic of Korea (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, J.G., Liu, G.R.: A point interpolation meshless method based on radial basis functions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 54, 1623–1648 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, M.S., Kim, C.W., Kim, J.H., Choi, J.H.: Efficient optimization method for noisy responses of mechanical systems. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 222(C), 2433–2439 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kitayama, S., Arakawa, M., Yamazaki, K.: Sequential approximate optimization using radial basis function network for engineering optimization. Optim. Eng. 12(4), 535–557 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Heo
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. H. Kim
    • 1
  • D. O. Kang
    • 2
  • W. Y. Ki
    • 1
  • S. M. H. Darwish
    • 3
  • W. C. Choi
    • 1
  • H. J. Yim
    • 1
  1. 1.Kookim UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Institute of Design OptimizationSeongnamKorea
  3. 3.King Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations