Skip to main content

What You See is What You Map: Geometry-Preserving Micro-Mapping for Smaller Geographic Objects with mapIT

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Geographic information is increasingly contributed by volunteers via crowdsourcing platforms. However, most tools and methods require a high technical affinity of its users and a good understanding of geographic classification systems. These technological and educational barriers prevent casual users to contribute spatial data. In this chapter we present mapIT, a method to acquire and contribute complex geographic data. We further introduce the concept of micro-mapping, the acquisition of geometrically correct geometric data of small geographic entities. mapIT is a method for micro-mapping with smartphones with high geometric precision. We show that mapIT is highly accurate and able to reconstruct the geometry of mapped entities correctly.Please check and confirm the author names and initials are correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.openstreetmap.org

  2. 2.

    http://www.citygml.org/

  3. 3.

    http://www.adv-online.de

  4. 4.

    http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/products/os-mastermap/index.html

  5. 5.

    WYSIWYG: “What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get”

  6. 6.

    http://developer.android.com/reference/android/speech/tts/TextToSpeech.html

  7. 7.

    At the current state, the parameter \(h\) has to be set manually.

References

  • Aanensen D, Huntley D, Feil E, Spratt B et al (2009) Epicollect: linking smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLoS One 4(9):e6968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asyraf Hamdani M, Hashim K, Adnan R, Manan Samad A (2011) 3D images processing of structural building using digital close-range photogrammetric approach. In: IEEE 7th international colloquium on signal processing and its applications (CSPA), pp 318–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioni J, Eriksson J (2012) Map inference in the face of noise and disparity. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on advances in geographic information systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012), Redondo Beach, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Brando C, Bucher B, Abadie N (2011) Specifications for user generated spatial content. Adv Geoinf Sci Chang World, pp 479–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas D, Peucker T (1973) Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. The Canadian Cartographer, 10(2):112–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Jin X, Zhang X, Shen J, Hou X (2009) Geometry features measurement of traffic accident for reconstruction based on close-range photogrammetry. Adv Eng Soft 40(7):497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood S (2008) Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J, van Dam A, Feiner S, Hughes J, Phillips R (1993) Introduction to computer graphics. Addison-Wesley Professional

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser C, Cronk S, Hanley H (2008) Close-range photogrammetry in traffic incident management. In: Proceedings of XXI ISPRS congress commission V, WG V, Citeseer, vol 1, pp 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommberger L, Schmid F, Cai C, Freksa C, Haddawy P (2012) Barrier-free micro-mapping for development and poverty reduction. Role of volunteered geographic information in advancing science: quality and credibility

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M (2009) Neogeography and the nature of geographic expertise. J Location Based Serv 3(2):82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of openstreetmap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plan B Plan Des 37(4):682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Jáuregui D, White K (2008) Close-range photogrammetry applications in bridge measurement: literature review. Measurement 41(8):823–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CE, Weber P (2012) Towards usability engineering for online editors of volunteered geographic information: a perspective on learnability. Trans GIS 16(4):523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann T (2010) Close range photogrammetry for industrial applications. ISPRS J Photogram Rem Sens 65(6):558–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Joshi D, Yu J, Gallagher A (2011) Geotagging in multimedia and computer vision—a survey. Multimedia Tools Appl 51:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maisonneuve N, Chopard B (2012) Crowdsourcing satellite imagery analysis: study of parallel and iterative models. Geograph Inf Sci, pp 116–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramm F, Topf J, Chilton S (2010) OpenStreetMap—using and enhancing the free map of the world, UIT Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid F, Cai C, Frommberger L (2012) A new micro-mapping method for rapid vgi-ing of small geographic features. In: Geographic information science: 7th international conference (GIScience, (2012) Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid F, Kutz O, Frommberger L, Kauppinen T, Cai C (2012) Intuitive and natural interfaces for geospatial data classification. In: Workshop on place-related knowledge acquisition research (P-KAR), Kloster Seeon, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui D (2008) The wikification of GIS and its consequences: or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Comput Environ Urban Sys 32(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AJ (2006) Introduction to neogeography. O’Reilly, Media

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support by the University of Bremen, the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the SFB/TR8 Spatial Cognition and the International Research Training Group on Semantic Integration of Geospatial Information (GRK 1498), and support by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme—Marie Curie Actions, Initial Training Network GEOCROWD under grant agreement No. FP7-PEOPLE-2010-ITN-264994.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Falko Schmid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmid, F., Frommberger, L., Cai, C., Freksa, C. (2013). What You See is What You Map: Geometry-Preserving Micro-Mapping for Smaller Geographic Objects with mapIT . In: Vandenbroucke, D., Bucher, B., Crompvoets, J. (eds) Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00615-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics