Elicitation of Quality Characteristics for AAL Systems and Services

  • Aida Omerovic
  • Anders Kofod-Petersen
  • Bjørnar Solhaug
  • Ingrid Svagård
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 219)

Abstract

Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) is a promising and fast growing area of technologies and services to assist people with special needs (e.g. elderly or disabled) in managing more independently their everyday life. AAL is founded on increasing needs for welfare technologies, as well as on significant effort from many scientific disciplines, the society, and the industry. The research has so far been primarily concentrated on elicitation of the functional aspects and on providing the technical solutions for the AAL systems and services. The problem of eliciting non-functional requirements and quality characteristics that are specific and critical for AAL, however, has been addressed to a much lesser extent. Failing to ensure the necessary system and service quality regarding critical characteristics may represent a significant obstacle to the wider acceptance of AAL in the society. There is hence a need to increase awareness of quality of AAL systems and services by providing the necessary supplement to the established state of the art. This paper reports on the process and the results from elicitation of AAL specific quality characteristics. The approach is based on established reference architectures and roadmapping material, as well as the ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality standard. The paper demonstrates how to do the elicitation in practice, and proposes the set of quality characteristics that are most important in the AAL context.

Keywords

Ambient Assisted Living AAL Systems and Services Quality Characteristics ISO/IEC 9126 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    AAL Joint Programme, www.aal-europe.eu (accessed November 18, 2012)
  2. 2.
    AAL Open Association, www.aaloa.org (accessed November 18, 2012)
  3. 3.
    Aarts, E., Marzano, S. (eds.): The New Everyday: Visions of Ambient Intelligence. 010 Publishing (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antonino, P.O., Schneider, D., Hofmann, C., Nakagawa, E.Y.: Evaluation of AAL Platforms According to Architecture-Based Quality Attributes. In: Keyson, D.V., Maher, M.L., Streitz, N., Cheok, A., Augusto, J.C., Wichert, R., Englebienne, G., Aghajan, H., Kröse, B.J.A. (eds.) AmI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7040, pp. 264–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin Company (1979)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horizon 2020 – the framework programme for research and innovation. The European Commission, COM(2011) 808 final (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ezzy, D.: Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Allen & Unwin (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farshchian, B.A., Mikalsen, K.H.M., Reitan, J.: AAL technologies in rehabilitation - Lessons learned from a COPD case study. In: Handbook of Ambient Assisted Living - Technology for Healthcare, Rehabilitation and Well-being. Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, vol. 11, pp. 549–566. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 9126 – Software engineering – Product quality – Part 1-4 (2001-2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    OASIS: Open architecture for Accessible Services Integration and Standardisation, http://oasis-project.eu/ (accessed November 18, 2012)
  11. 11.
    OpenAAL platform, http://www.openaal.org/ (accessed November 18, 2012)
  12. 12.
    Universal Open Platform and Reference Specification for Ambient Assisted Living, www.universaal.org (accessed November 18, 2012)
  13. 13.
    The universAAL reference architecture. universAAL project deliverable D1.3-C (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van den Broek, G., Cavallo, F., Wehrmann, C.: Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap. VDI/VDE-IT AALIANCE Office (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Web Services Glossary. W3C Working Group Note (February 11, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ (accessed November 14, 2012)
  16. 16.
    Walderhaug, S., Mikalsen, M., Salvi, D., Svagård, I., Ausen, D., Kofod-Petersen, A.: Towards Quality Assurance of AAL Services. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health (pHealth 2012). Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 177, pp. 296–303. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aida Omerovic
    • 1
  • Anders Kofod-Petersen
    • 1
  • Bjørnar Solhaug
    • 1
  • Ingrid Svagård
    • 1
  1. 1.SINTEF ICTTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations