Advertisement

A Study into Composite Laminators’ Motivation

Conference paper
  • 1.2k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Manufacture using advanced composite materials is a predominantly manual process. Despite recent advances in automation; the manufacture of complex panels such as those found in secondary aircraft structures, is usually carried out by highly skilled human operators. A requirement for increasing build rates of aircraft structures means that a formerly low production cycle technique must now be applied to much faster and larger production runs. This is further complicated by a desire to achieve higher quality at lower cost. Increased automation and laminator aids are being employed to achieve this goal. This paper presents an initial study into the current state of composite laminators’ motivation using Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. A series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with a variety of laminators from a range of industries. The principle aim is to generate a preliminary set of recommendations based on trends gained from this initial study, with a view to later widening the study to improve motivation and thus productivity and quality.

Keywords

Composite Laminator Composite Manufacture Permanent Staff Toyota Production System Laser Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Systems Centre and the EPSRC funded Industrial Doctorate Centre in Systems (Grant EP/G037353/1) and Renishaw plc. The authors would also like to thank all companies and individuals who participated in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Anon (2009) The UK composites strategy. Department for Business Innovation and Skills ReportGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anon (2009) Aerospace industry outlook—implications for composite demand. In: AeroStrategy management consulting presentation, composites industry investment forum 2008, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anon (2006) HYBRIDMAT 3: advances in the manufacture of advanced structural composites in aerospace—a mission to the USA. In: Report of a DTI global watch missionGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLong DJ (2007) Global market outlook for carbon fiber 2006 and beyond. SAMPE J 43(1):39–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ward C, Harza K, Potter KD (2011) Development of the manufacture of complex composite panels. Int J Mater Prod Technol 42(3/4):131–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anon (2009) The UK carbon fibre composites industry—market profile. Department for Business Innovation and Skills ReportGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weitao M (2011) Cost modelling for manufacturing of aerospace composites. M.sc research thesis, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Lukaszewicz DHJ, Ward C, Potter KD (2012) The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: history, present and future. Compos Part B 43:997–1009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ward C (2012) Personal communicationsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buckingham RO, Newell GC (1996) Automating the manufacture of composite broadgoods. Compos Part A 27A(3):191–200Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ward C (2010) Manufacturing quality assessment through in-process inspection. In: 31st SAMPE Europe international technical conference, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsh G (2011) Automating aerospace component production with fibre placement. REINFORCED Plast 55:32Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hancock SG, Potter KD (2006) The use of kinematic drape modelling to inform the hand lay-up of complex composite components using woven reinforcements. Compos Part A 37:413–422Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hancock SG, Potter KD (2005) Inverse drape modeling—an investigation of the set of shapes that can be formed from continuous aligned woven fibre reinforcements. Compos Part A 37:947–953Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anon (2010) LPT100 laser RADAR projector. Laser Projection Technologies BrochureGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anon (2012) LASERGUIDE: the next generation. Assembly Guidance Systems BrochureGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miracle DB, Donaldson SL (2001) ASM handbook, vol 21: composites. ASM International, OhioGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newell CG, Buckingham RO, Khodabandehloo K (1996) The automated manufacture of prepreg broadgoods components—a review of literature. Compos Part A 27A(3):211–217Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kujinga A (2006) Organisation of in-process inspection and control of the lamination process in carbon fibre composites manufacturing. MRes Thesis, School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science, Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maslow A (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50:370–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McLeod SA (2007) Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. http://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow. Accessed 18 Jan 2013
  23. 23.
    Huitt W (2007) Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Educational psychology interactive, http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/regsys/maslow.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2013
  24. 24.
    Maslow A, Lowery R (1988) Toward a psychology of being, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman BB (1959) The motivation to work. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramlall S (2004) A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. J Am Acad Bus 5(1/2):52–63Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wahba MA, Bridwell LG (1976) Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organ Behav Human Perform 15:212–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tay L, Diener E (2011) Needs and subjective well-being around the world. J Pers Soc Psychol 101(2):354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kenrick DT, Griskevicus V, Neuberg SL, Schaller M (2010) Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(3):292–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bentley TW (1994) Factors affecting the motivation of skilled craftsmen in the United States Air Force. M. sc Thesis, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parkes KR, Clark MJ (1997) Part IV The offshort environment in the mid-1990s: a survey of psychosocial factors. Health and Safety Executive—Offshore Technology ReportGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lam SYW, Tang CHW (2003) Motivation of survey employees in construction projects. J Geospatial Eng 5(1):61–66Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shah R, Ward PT (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manage 25:785–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDC in SystemsUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.ACCIS, University of BristolBristolUK
  3. 3.MAPDRenishaw plcWotton-Under-EdgeUK

Personalised recommendations