Abstract
Currently, the development of complex automated production stations will almost be impossible without the use of computer aided simulation. So as to increase the reliability of such simulations, the simulation models must depict the reality as much as possible. Including the physical properties of the elements in the models allows for an increase in realism of the simulation. One of the aspects in this field is the pneumatic behavior of pneumatic drives. Using physics based simulation approaches of the video game industry, a real-time assembly station simulation for the virtual commissioning considering the pneumatic behavior of the pneumatic drive was developed. This paper presents how the underlying model was developed and the extent to which different simulation factors have an influence on the pneumatic behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Roscher J (2008) Bewertung von Flexibilitätsstrategien für die Endmontage in der Automobilindustrie Institut für industrielle Fertigung und Fabrikbetrieb. Dissertation, Stuttgart
Bracht U (2002) Ansätze und Methoden der Digitalen Fabrik. TU Clausthal, IMAB, Anlagenprojektierung und Materialflusslogistik
Strahilov A (2012) Development of the physics-based assembly system model for the mechatronic validation of automated assembly systems. Winter simulation conference (WSC), Berlin
Spitzweg M (2009) Methode und Konzept für den Einsatz eines physikalischen Modells in der Entwicklung von Produktionsanlagen. Dissertation
Strahilov A (2012) Mechanische Absicherung automatisierter Montageanlagen mit physikbasierten Simulationen. Design for X, Bamberg
Geimer M (2009) Vorlesung Fluidtechnik. KIT, Karlsruhe
Baehr HD (2005) Thermodynamik. Springer, Bochum
Gebhardt N (2010) Fluidtechnik in Kraftfahrzeugen. Springer, Dresden
Parr A (2011) Hydraulics and pneumatics. Elsevier, Oxford
Esposito A (2009) Fluid power. Pearson, Ohio
Coumans E (2012) Bullet 2.80 physics SDK manual. Manual
Eberly DH (2004) Game physics. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos
Reinhart G, Lacour FF (2010) Design metaphors for physically based virtual commissioning. Paper
Kiefer J, Bergert M, Rossdeutscher M (2011) Mechatronic objects in production engineering: a key enabler in automotive industry. In: atpedition, Dec 2010, pp 36–44, ISSN 2190-4111
FLUIDON: http://www.fluidon.com/index.php?id=144, am 17 Dec 2012 um 11:42 Uhr
Boeing A, Bräunl T (2007) Evaluation of real-time physics simulation systems. School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering University of Western Australia. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia
Song P (2002) Modeling, analysis and simulation of multibody systems with contact and friction. Dissertation in mechanical engineering and applied mechanics, University of Pennsylvania
Lee SH, Terzopoulos D (2008) Spline joints for multibody dynamics. ACM Trans
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Strahilov, A., Effmert, D., Other, A.N. (2013). Simulation of the Pneumatic Behavior in the Virtual Commissioning of Automated Assembly Systems. In: Azevedo, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00556-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00557-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)