Advertisement

An Adaptive Approach for Noise Reduction in Sequences of CT Images

  • Veska Georgieva
  • Roumen Kountchev
  • Ivo Draganov
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 486)

Abstract

CT presents images of cross-sectional slices of the body. The quality of CT images varies depending on penetrating X-rays in a different anatomically structures. Noise in CT is a multi-source problem and arises from the fundamentally statistical nature of photon production. This chapter presents an adaptive approach for noise reduction in sequences of CT images, based on the Wavelet Packet Decomposition and adaptive threshold of wavelet coefficients in the high frequency sub-bands of the shrinkage decomposition. Implementation results are given to demonstrate the visual quality and to analyze some objective estimation parameters such as PSNR, SNR, NRR, and Effectiveness of filtration in the perspective of clinical diagnosis.

Keywords

CT image Noise reduction Wavelet transformations Adaptive threshold 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter was supported by the Joint Research Project Bulgaria-Romania (2010–2012): “Electronic Health Records for the Next Generation Medical Decision Support in Romanian and Bulgarian National Healthcare Systems”, DNTS 02/19.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, M., Docef, A.: Transforms in telemedicine applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Athhanasiadis, T., Wallace, M., Kapouzis, K., Kollias, S.: Utilization of evidence theory in the detection of salient regions in successive CT images. Oncol Rep 15, 1071–1076 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donoho, D., Johnston, I.: Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425–455 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donoho, D., Johnston, I.: Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1200–1224 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeyong, S., Aviyente, S.: Image denoising based on the wavelet co-occurance matrix. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 9(9), 1522–1531 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coifmann, R., Wickerhauser, M.: Entropy based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 38, 713–718 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Georgieva, V., Kountchev, R.: An influence of the wavelet packet decomposition on noise reduction in ultrasound images. In: Proceedings of International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy systems and Technology, pp. 185–188, Sofia, Bulgaria (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MATLAB User’s Guide. Accessed at:www.mathwork.com
  9. 9.
    Georgieva, V.M.: An Approach for computed tomography images enhancement. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2(98), 71–74 (2010) (Kaunas: Technologija)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Bartuschat, A. Borsdorf, H.Koestler, R. Rubinstein, M. Stueurmer. A parallel K-SVD implementation for CT image denoising. Fridrich-Alexander University, Erlangen (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyder Ali, S., Sukanesh, R.: An improved denoising algorithm using curvlet thresholding technique for medical images. Int. J. Adv. Comput. (IJAC) 2(2), 83–91 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amijad Ali, S., Srinivasan, S., Lalkishore, K.: CT Image denoisung technique using ga aided window-based multiwavelet transformation and thresholging with incorporation of an effective quality enhancement method. Int. J. Digit. Content Technol. Appl. 4, 73–87 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veska Georgieva
    • 1
  • Roumen Kountchev
    • 1
  • Ivo Draganov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radio Communications and Video TechnologiesTechnical University of SofiaSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations