Skip to main content

Investigating Language Awareness: The Role of Terminology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Awareness in Action

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

This chapter examines critically the way in which metalinguistic terminology has been exploited in a number of tests designed to investigate various constructs which may be loosely grouped under the heading ‘language awareness’. The concept of language awareness is first discussed and a number of tests of it involving terminology are compared. Then a number of problems with such use of terminology are discussed, namely: a failure to distinguish terminology from metalanguage, a failure to question whether any kind of metalanguage is required, a failure to distinguish scientific and pedagogic terminology, and problems with the design of the tests. These points are then applied in a critical evaluation of items from two such tests, showing above all that tests using terminology are in great danger of losing their validity, of becoming tests of terminology alone and not of language awareness. The chapter concludes with suggestions for designers of tests involving terminology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From 2001 to 2002 I was Chief Examiner for the writing paper of LPATE.

References

  • Alderson, J. C., C. Clapham and D. Steel. 1997. Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research 1/2: 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. 1994. The grammatical awareness and knowledge of Kong Kong teachers of English. In Language and learning, eds. N. Bird, A. B. M. Tsui, D. Allison and A. McNeill. Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. 1998. ‘All these like little name things’: A comparative study of language teachers’ explicit knowledge of grammar and grammatical terminology. Language Awareness 8/3 & 4: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. 2007. Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental concepts in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. 1997. Teachers’ awareness of learners’ knowledge: The case of metalinguistic terminology. Language Awareness 6/2 & 3: 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. 2005. Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness 14/1: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. 2009. EFL majors’ knowledge of metalinguistic terminology: A comparative study. Language Awareness 18/2: 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. 2010. Terminology in English language teaching: Nature and use. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, T. 1986. University students knowledge about language, CLIE working papers number 8. British Association for Applied Linguistics/Linguistics Association of Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. 1999. The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: A qualitative study of teachers’ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics 20: 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. 2003. Key concepts in ELT: Language awareness. ELT Journal 57/1: 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins Cobuild English Grammar. 2011. Glasgow: Harper Collins, 3rd edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coniam, D. and P. Falvey. 2002. Selecting models and setting standards for teachers of English in Hong Kong (third edition). Journal of Asian Pacific Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong SAR. 2007. Language proficiency assessment for teachers (English Language) handbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, C. 2009. Validating a test of metalinguistic knowledge. In Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, eds. R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. M. Erlam, J. Philp and H. Reinders, 113–138. Bristol – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54/2: 227–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 2009. Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, eds. R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. M. Erlam, J. Philp and H. Reinders, 113–138. Bristol – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip and H. Reinders, eds. 2009. Implicit and explicit knowledge in language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y. and R. Ellis. 1998. Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research 2/1: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B. 1994. Appealing to consciousness in the L2 classroom. AILA Review 11: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. and H. Johnson. 1998. Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxfrod: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorowska, H. 2012. Language awareness—is the concept really needed or useful? Paper delivered at the 24th International Conference on Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning, Szczyrk, Poland, May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 1986. The English verb. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. and L. Masterman. 2006. Does intensive grammar instruction make a difference? Language Teaching Research 10/3: 297–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. In AILA Review 11: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, D. and J. C. Alderson. 1994. Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. In Language in a changing Europe, eds. D. Graddol and T. Stephen, 92–103. Clevedon: BAAL and Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svalborg, A. 2009. Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness 18/3 & 4: 242–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, D. 1994. The lexical approach. In Grammar and the language teacher, eds. M. Bygate, A. Tonkin and E. Williams, 56–66. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Berry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berry, R. (2014). Investigating Language Awareness: The Role of Terminology. In: Łyda, A., Szcześniak, K. (eds) Awareness in Action. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00461-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics