Abstract
Science is under attack from those who believe that truth is relative and from those who reject the critical standards of science in favor of comforting pseudoscientific beliefs. Be prepared to defend science by understanding the philosophy of science so that you can marshal your arguments against pseudoscience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beyerstein BL (2001) Alternative medicine and common errors of reasoning. Acad Med 76:230–237
Feynman R (1996) Six easy pieces. Helix Books. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. p 4
Gardner M (1981) Science: good, bad, and bogus. Prometheus books. See also http://www.csicop.org. (The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry publishes the on-line journal The Skeptical Inquirer that uses critical investigation, and the use of reason, to examine controversial and extraordinary claims. Some of the founding members of CSI include scientists, academics, and science writers such as Carl Sagan, Isaac Asimov, Philip Klass, Paul Kurtz, Ray Hyman, James Randi, Martin Gardner, Sidney Hook, and others.)
Kitzmiller v (2005) Dover Area School District. United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, 20 Dec 2005
Williams BA (2010) Perils of evidence-based medicine. Perspect Biol Med 53:106–120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Truran, P. (2013). Science, Non-Science and Pseudoscience. In: Practical Applications of the Philosophy of Science. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00452-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00452-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00451-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00452-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)