Advertisement

The Role of Design in Bringing Innovation to the Marketplace

  • Clifford M. GrossEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

Design is the sticky glue that holds and provides context for the multiple disciplines required to develop solutions to the difficult problem of addressing unmet, poorly articulated customer needs. Design may serve as a proxy for innovation or subsume it, depending on the vantage point selected. In both cases, it has the power to drive the firm forward and become the platform for its growth strategy. Not just design but ‘design thinking’ is able to address the anti-innovation, in-grained behavior expressed by some firms, as an antidote to inertial-laden, risk mitigation thinking, as an improved vehicle for driving corporate progress. In this sense, it is the new frontier for creating a competitive advantage, especially when capital, labor, and a continuous influx of external innovations are readily available. Economically, it resides within total factor productivity (TFP), the special sauce that improves the efficiency of companies and countries as they seek to compete on a global scale.

Keywords

Total Factor Productivity Vacuum Cleaner Design Thinking Great Product Innovation External Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Gross C. The right fit. Oregon: Productivity Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Martin R. The design of business: why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Kelley D, Van Patter GK. Design as glue. Understanding the Stanford D. School. NextD Journal Conversation 21 http://issuu.com/nextd/docs/conv21); 2005.
  4. Design Thinking, Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_thinking, Accessed Aug 9 2012.
  5. Brown T. Design thinking, Harvard Business Review, June 2008. pp. 84–92.Google Scholar
  6. Kimbell L. Rethinking design thinking. Part I Des Culture. 2011;3(3):285–306.Google Scholar
  7. Kimbell L. Design thinking/design-as-practice, Handout, Session #3, MBA elective in designing better futures, Said Business School, Oxford University; 2012. p. 19.Google Scholar
  8. Nussbaum B. Design thinking is a failed experiment. So what’s next?, Co. Design, Editor Cliff Kuang, April 6 2011. http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-so-whats-next, Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  9. Vrba J, De Heinzelin J, Schick K, Hart W, White T, Woldegabriel G, Walter R, Suwa G, et al. African Homo erectus: old radiometric ages and young oldowan assemblages in the middle Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Science. 1994;264(5167):1907–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Oxford Center for InnovationTekcapital LimitedOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations