Skip to main content

Complexity Fits the Fittest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Nature Works

Part of the book series: Emergence, Complexity and Computation ((ECC,volume 5))

Abstract

In this paper we shall relate computational complexity to the principle of natural selection. We shall do this by giving a philosophical account of complexity versus universality. It seems sustainable to equate universal systems to complex systems or at least to potentially complex systems. Post’s problem on the existence of (natural) intermediate degrees (between decidable and universal \(\Sigma _1^0\)) then finds its analog in the Principle of Computational Equivalence (\(\mathbf{PCE }\)). In this paper we address possible driving forces—if any—behind \(\mathbf{PCE }\). Both the natural aspects as well as the cognitive ones are investigated. We postulate a principle \(\mathbf{GNS }\) that we call the Generalized Natural Selection principle that together with the Church-Turing thesis is seen to be in close correspondence to a weak version of \(\mathbf{PCE }\). Next, we view our cognitive toolkit in an evolutionary light and postulate a principle in analogy with Fodor’s language principle. In the final part of the paper we reflect on ways to provide circumstantial evidence for \(\mathbf{GNS }\) by means of theorems, experiments or, simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This requirement can be relaxed as a universal CA can mimic any other CA too.

References

  1. C.S. Calude, G. Paun, Computing with Cells and Atoms: An Introduction to Quantum, DNA and Membrane Computing (CRC Press, Leiden, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.B. Cooper, Computability Theory (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004) ISBN 1-58488-237-9

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Delahaye, H. Zenil, Numerical evaluation of algorithmic complexity for short strings: a glance into the innermost structure of randomness. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(24) (2012). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, New York, 1976). ISBN 0-19-286092-5

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.A. Fodor, Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres, ed. by Z.W. Pylyshyn (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.J. Joosten, On the necessity of complexity. in Irreducibility and Computational Equivalence: 10 Years After the Publication of Wolfram’s A New Kind of Science, ed. by H. Zenil (ed.), to be published in 2012/2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Keefe, Theories of Vagueness (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Paun, G. Rozenberg, A. Salomaa, DNA Computing: New Computing Paradigms (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Post, Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, 284–316 (1944)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Shanahan, Solving the Frame Problem; A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Intertia (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.G. Simpson, Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, 2nd edn. Perspectives in Logic (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Sutner, Computational processes, observers and Turing incompleteness. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(1–2), 183–190 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Wolfram, A New Kind of Science (Wolfram Media, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Systems, ed. by G.J. Klir, B. Yuan (World Scientific Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Zenil, Compression-based investigation of the dynamical properties of cellular automata and other systems. J. Complex Syst. 19(1), 1–28 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Barry Cooper and Hector Zenil for fruitful discussions on the subject.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joost J. Joosten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joosten, J.J. (2014). Complexity Fits the Fittest. In: Zelinka, I., Sanayei, A., Zenil, H., Rössler, O. (eds) How Nature Works. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, vol 5. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00254-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics