Psychological Analysis: Not Introspection Simpliciter

Chapter

Abstract

If Titchener, as we argued above, rejected so many sources of important insight and areas of crucial practical application of psychology, did he at least have the benefit of psychological data derived from introspection? The present claim is that he did not. Despite the many calls for experimental introspection, Titchener had little regard for what we today would recognize as introspection.

References

  1. Boring EG (1953) A history of introspection. Psychol Bull 50(3):169–189Google Scholar
  2. Carroll L (1994) Through the looking glass. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Danziger K (1980) The history of introspection reconsidered. J Hist Behav Sci 16(3):241–262Google Scholar
  4. Gertler B, Shapiro L (2007) Consciousness: how should it be studied? In: Gertler B, Shapiro L (eds) Arguing about the mind. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Hearnshaw LS (1964) A short history of British psychology 1850–1940. Methuen & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Jack AI, Roepstorff A (2002) Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: From stimulus-response to script-report. Trends Cogn Sci 6(8):333–339Google Scholar
  7. Koffka K (1924/1925) Introspection and the method of psychology. Br J Psychol 15(2):149–161Google Scholar
  8. Lyons W (1986) The disappearance of introspection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwitzgebel E (2007) Eric Schwitzgebel’s contribution to Describing inner experience: Proponent meets skeptic (Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel), MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Titchener EB (1912a) Prolegomena to a study of introspection. Am J Psychol 23(3):427–448Google Scholar
  11. Titchener EB (1912b) The schema of introspection. Am J Psychol 23(4):485–508Google Scholar
  12. Titchener EB (1920a) A beginner’s psychology. The Macmillan Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Watson JB (1913) Psychology as a behaviorist views it. Psychol Rev 20:158–177Google Scholar
  14. Watson JB (1914) Behavior: an introduction to comparative psychology. Henry Holt and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media, Cognition and CommunicationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations