Skip to main content

Communication Apprehension and Self-Perceived Communication Competence as Variables Underlying Willingness to Communicate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Correspondences and Contrasts in Foreign Language Pedagogy and Translation Studies

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Based on the literature, willingness to communicate (WTC) can be defined as “the probability that an individual will choose to initiate communication, more specifically, talking, when free to do so” (MacIntyre et al. The Canadian Modern Language Review 59:590, 2003). Two crucial factors directly influencing one’s willingness to communicate are perceived communication competence together with communication apprehension (MacIntyre et al. Modern Language Journal 82:545–562, 1998). Perceived communication competence refers to self-reported verbal activity and ability (McCroskey Communication Education 31(1):1–7, 1982) while communication apprehension is described as an “individual level of fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication with another person or persons” (McCroskey Communication education 26:28, 1977). The paper explores the extent to which perceived competence and communication apprehension are the causes of students’ willingness to communicate as hypothesized by MacIntyre et al. (The Canadian Modern Language Review 59:587–605, 2003) and found by MacIntyre and Charos (Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15:3–26, 1996). Three types of questionnaires were used to investigate the relations among the above-mentioned variables. The subjects of the study were first-year students of the English Department at the University of Silesia. The students completed WTC Scale (McCroskey Communication Quarterly 40:16–25, 1992), Self-perceived Communication Competence Scale (McCroskey Communication Research Reports 5, 108–113, 1988) and Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (McCroskey Communication Education 31(1):1–7, 1982). All three instruments were administered to one group of students, altogether 25 subjects. Results show that a combination of perceived competence and communication apprehension strongly impact willingness to communicate. In the following presentation primary attention is devoted to questionnaire results. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burgoon, J. K. 1976. The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs 43: 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. E., P. M. Backlund, M. K. Redmond and A. Barbour. 1978. Assessing communicative competence. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association and ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D. and C. Charos 1996. Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei and K. A. Noels 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82: 545–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D., S. C. Baker, R. Clément and L. A. Donovan 2003. Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review 59: 587–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D. and R. C. Gardner. 1994. The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning 44: 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1970. Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs 37(4): 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1976. The effects of communication apprehension on non verbal behavior. Communication Quarterly 24: 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1977. Classroom consequences of communication apprehension. Communication Education 26: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1982. Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education 31(1): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40: 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 2008. Communication apprehension: What have we learned in the last four decades? Human Communication 12(2): 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. and L. L. McCroskey. 1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports 5: 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. and V. P. Richmond. 1982. Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal 33: 458–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. and V. P. Richmond. 1990. Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In Communication, cognition, and anxiety, special issue of the Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, ed. M. Booth-Butterfield 5(2): 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, D. C., P. H. Arnston and M. Lustig. 1977. The measurement of verbal predispositions: Scale development and application. Human Communication Research 3: 146–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. M. 1965. The problem of reticence. Pennsylvania Speech Annual 22: 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmara Gałajda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gałajda, D. (2013). Communication Apprehension and Self-Perceived Communication Competence as Variables Underlying Willingness to Communicate. In: Piątkowska, K., Kościałkowska-Okońska, E. (eds) Correspondences and Contrasts in Foreign Language Pedagogy and Translation Studies. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00161-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics