Abstract
Based on the literature, willingness to communicate (WTC) can be defined as “the probability that an individual will choose to initiate communication, more specifically, talking, when free to do so” (MacIntyre et al. The Canadian Modern Language Review 59:590, 2003). Two crucial factors directly influencing one’s willingness to communicate are perceived communication competence together with communication apprehension (MacIntyre et al. Modern Language Journal 82:545–562, 1998). Perceived communication competence refers to self-reported verbal activity and ability (McCroskey Communication Education 31(1):1–7, 1982) while communication apprehension is described as an “individual level of fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication with another person or persons” (McCroskey Communication education 26:28, 1977). The paper explores the extent to which perceived competence and communication apprehension are the causes of students’ willingness to communicate as hypothesized by MacIntyre et al. (The Canadian Modern Language Review 59:587–605, 2003) and found by MacIntyre and Charos (Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15:3–26, 1996). Three types of questionnaires were used to investigate the relations among the above-mentioned variables. The subjects of the study were first-year students of the English Department at the University of Silesia. The students completed WTC Scale (McCroskey Communication Quarterly 40:16–25, 1992), Self-perceived Communication Competence Scale (McCroskey Communication Research Reports 5, 108–113, 1988) and Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (McCroskey Communication Education 31(1):1–7, 1982). All three instruments were administered to one group of students, altogether 25 subjects. Results show that a combination of perceived competence and communication apprehension strongly impact willingness to communicate. In the following presentation primary attention is devoted to questionnaire results. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burgoon, J. K. 1976. The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs 43: 60–69.
Larson, C. E., P. M. Backlund, M. K. Redmond and A. Barbour. 1978. Assessing communicative competence. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association and ERIC.
MacIntyre, P. D. and C. Charos 1996. Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15: 3–26.
MacIntyre, P. D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei and K. A. Noels 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82: 545–562.
MacIntyre, P. D., S. C. Baker, R. Clément and L. A. Donovan 2003. Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review 59: 587–605.
MacIntyre, P. D. and R. C. Gardner. 1994. The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning 44: 283–305.
McCroskey, J. C. 1970. Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs 37(4): 269–277.
McCroskey, J. C. 1976. The effects of communication apprehension on non verbal behavior. Communication Quarterly 24: 39–44.
McCroskey, J. C. 1977. Classroom consequences of communication apprehension. Communication Education 26: 27–33.
McCroskey, J. C. 1982. Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education 31(1): 1–7.
McCroskey, J. C. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40: 16–25.
McCroskey, J. C. 2008. Communication apprehension: What have we learned in the last four decades? Human Communication 12(2): 157–171.
McCroskey, J. C. and L. L. McCroskey. 1988. Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports 5: 108–113.
McCroskey, J. C. and V. P. Richmond. 1982. Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal 33: 458–468.
McCroskey, J. C. and V. P. Richmond. 1990. Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In Communication, cognition, and anxiety, special issue of the Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, ed. M. Booth-Butterfield 5(2): 19–37.
Mortensen, D. C., P. H. Arnston and M. Lustig. 1977. The measurement of verbal predispositions: Scale development and application. Human Communication Research 3: 146–158.
Phillips, G. M. 1965. The problem of reticence. Pennsylvania Speech Annual 22: 22–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gałajda, D. (2013). Communication Apprehension and Self-Perceived Communication Competence as Variables Underlying Willingness to Communicate. In: Piątkowska, K., Kościałkowska-Okońska, E. (eds) Correspondences and Contrasts in Foreign Language Pedagogy and Translation Studies. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00161-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00161-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00160-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00161-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)