Advertisement

Looking Like an Occupational Therapist: (Re)presentations of Her Comportment within Autoethnographic Tales

  • Sally DenshireEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 11)

Abstract

The work of occupational therapists to do with ordinary-everyday activities of others is ambivalently represented. Indeed current notions of ‘regulated evidence’ and ‘wise practice’ can present clashing traditions for occupational therapists. Writing practice differently since the 1980s, I am interested in internal and external representations of lived bodies in practice. This chapter, about the role that representations(s) might play in better understanding practice and the body, draws on selected moments of my occupational therapy work from the 1980s. Each fictive re-telling of a selected article from my body of work placed in dialogue with a corresponding tale was presented in a portfolio of autoethnographic tales of sexuality, food and death. The excerpts in this chapter show the socio-material comportment of a 30-something occupational therapist going about her youth-specific practice in a paediatric hospital. Having a woman’s lived and practising body located in the foreground of these autoethnographic re-tellings provides a series of unexpected (re)presentations of professional practice. Professional comportment is disciplined and shaped through a series of experiences of comfort and discomfort occurring within, on and around a lived and practised body, as well as what inter-professional others notice about each other’s demeanour and conduct on a hospital ward.

Keywords

Occupational Therapist Professional Practice Occupational Therapy Therapist Character Regulate Evidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, B., & Bell, J. (1988). Occupational therapy: Its place in Australia’s history. Sydney: NSW Association of Occupational Therapists.Google Scholar
  2. Barnitt, R. (1998). The virtuous therapist. In J. Creek (Ed.), Occupational therapy: New perspectives (pp. 77–98). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  3. Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  4. Borthwick, F. (2006). Noisy, smelly, dirty dogs: A sensorial autoethnography of living with dogs. ACSPRI 2006 Social Science Methodology Conference, New Ethnographies and Critical Creativity Stream. The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  5. Boyt Schell, B. A., & Harris, D. (2008). Embodiment: Reasoning with the whole body. In A. B. Boyt Schell & J. W. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Clinical and professional reasoning in occupational therapy (pp. 69–88). Maryland: Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  6. Bradley, B. (2009). Re-thinking experience in professional practice: Lessons from clinical psychology. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 65–82). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  7. Bruni, N. (2002). The crisis of visibility: Ethical dilemmas in autoethnographic research. Qualitative Research Journal, 2(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, G. (2002). Supporting the health and well-being of people with intellectual disability and high support needs through networking and resource development. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 49, 37–43. doi: 10.1046/j.0045-0766.2002.00285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Church, K. (1995). Forbidden narratives: Critical autobiography as social science. Newark: Gordon & Breach.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, F., Ennevor, B. L., et al. (1996). A grounded theory of techniques for occupational story telling and occupational story making. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 373–392). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  11. Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Denshire, S. (1985). Normal spaces in abnormal places: The significance of environment in occupational therapy with hospitalised teenagers. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 32(4), 142–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.1985.tb01513.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denshire, S. (1996). A decade of creative occupation: The production of a youth arts archive in a hospital site. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 3(3), 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denshire, S. (2005). ‘This is a hospital, not a circus!’ Reflecting on generative metaphors for a deeper understanding of professional practice. International Journal of Critical Psychology, (13: Critical Professionals), 158–178.Google Scholar
  16. Denshire, S. (2009). Writing the ordinary: Auto-ethnographic tales of an occupational therapist. Unpublished PhD, The University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar
  17. Denshire, S. (2011). ‘Le moment de la lune’. An auto-ethnographic tale of practice about menarche in a children’s hospital. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 270–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00929.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denshire, S. (2012, May 9–11). Orchestrating a surprise party – A twice-told tale of derided interventions in the ‘heartland of medicine’. Paper presented at the ProPEL international conference – Professional Practice in Troubling Times: Emergent Practices and Transgressive Knowledges. Scotland: Stirling.Google Scholar
  19. Denshire, S., & Lee, A. (2013). Autoethnography as assemblage: accounts of occupational therapy practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 221–236.Google Scholar
  20. Didion, J. (2005). The year of magical thinking. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  21. Ellingson, L. (2006). Embodied knowledge: Writing researchers’ bodies into qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research, 16(2), 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fenwick, T., Richards., et al. (2011). Introduction: Why sociomateriality in education? In Emerging approaches in educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial (pp. 1–17). Abingdon/Oxon: Milton Park/Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Fleming, M. H. (1994). A commonsense practice in an uncommon world. In C. Mattingly & M. H. Fleming (Eds.), Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice (pp. 94–115). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  24. Fortune, T. (2000). Occupational therapists: Is our therapy truly occupational or are we merely filling gaps? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5), 225–230.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/ knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1992). The history of sexuality. Volume 3: The care of the self. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Frank, A. (2004). The renewal of generosity: Illness, medicine, and how to live. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Green, B. (2009). The primacy of practice and the problem of representation. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  31. Grilli, G. (2007). Myth, symbol and meaning in Mary Poppins: The governess as provocateur. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hammell, K. W. (2009). Sacred texts: A skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hasselkus, B. (1993). Death in very old age: A personal journey of care-giving. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 717–723. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.8.717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hasselkus, B. R. (2006). The world of everyday occupation: Real people real lives. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(6), 627–641. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.6.627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kamler, B. (2001). Relocating the personal: A critical writing pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kinsella, E. A. (2006). Poetic resistance: Juxtaposing personal and professional discursive constructions in a practice setting. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 4(1), 35–49.Google Scholar
  38. Law, M., Cooper, B., et al. (1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–22. doi: 10.1177/000841749606300103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, A., & Dunston, R. (2011, October). Practice, learning and change: Towards a theorisation of professional education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(5), 483–494. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.580840.
  40. Mackey, H. (2007). ‘Do not ask me to remain the same’: Foucault and the professional identities of occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54(2), 95–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00609.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mattingly, C. (1994a). Occupational therapy as a two-body practice: The body as machine. In C. Mattingly & M. H. Fleming (Eds.), Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice (pp. 37–63). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  42. Mattingly, C. (1994b). Occupational therapy as a two-body practice: The lived body. In C. Mattingly & M. H. Fleming (Eds.), Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice (pp. 64–93). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
  43. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2006). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
  44. Moon, B. (2004). Literary terms: A practical glossary. Scarborough: Chalkface Press.Google Scholar
  45. OT Australia. (2005). Issues paper to the Productivity Commission Health Workforce Study. Melbourne, Prepared by OT Australia (Australian Association of Occupational Therapists).Google Scholar
  46. Park Lala, A., & Kinsella, E. A. (2011). Embodiment in research practices: The body in qualitative research. In A. Titchen, J. Higgs, D. Horsfall, & D. Bridges (Eds.), Creative spaces for qualitative researching: Living research (pp. 1–10). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  47. Polatjako, H., Davis, J., et al. (2007). Specifying the domain of concern: Occupation as core. In E. Townsend & H. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation (pp. 9–36). Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE.Google Scholar
  48. Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession 91, Modern Languages Association (pp. 33–40).Google Scholar
  49. Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and writing the social. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  50. Reilly, M. (1962). Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, XVI(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  51. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schofield, D., & Fletcher, S. (2007). The physiotherapy workforce is ageing, becoming more masculinised and is working longer hours: A demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 53(2), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Selby, J. (2005). Editorial: Subjectivity as critical fulcrum, Professional practice as dilemma. International Journal of Critical Psychology, (Issue 13: Critical Professionals), 5–13.Google Scholar
  54. Somerville, M. (1999). Body/landscape journals. North Melbourne: Spinifex.Google Scholar
  55. Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225–243. doi: 10.1080/09518390601159750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thibeault, R. (1997). A funeral for my father’s mind: A therapist’s attempt at grieving. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 107–114. doi: 10.1177/000841749706400306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Townsend, E. (1998). Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vick, M. (2000). What does a teacher look like? Paedogogica Historica, 36(1), 247–266. doi: 10.1080/0030923000360112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White, S. (2003). Autoethnography – An appropriate methodology? Qualitative Research Journal, 3(2), 22–32.Google Scholar
  60. Whiteford, G., & Wright-St Clair, V. (2002). Being prepared for diversity in practice: Occupational therapy students’ perceptions of valuable intercultural learning experiences. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 129–137.Google Scholar
  61. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Young, I. M. (2005a). Lived body vs gender: Reflections on social structure and subjectivity. On female body experience: ‘Throwing like a girl’ and other essays (pp. 12–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Young, I. M. (2005b). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility and spatiality. On female body experience: ‘Throwing like a girl’ and other essays (pp. 27–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Community Health/Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education (RIPPLE)Charles Sturt University (CSU)AlburyAustralia

Personalised recommendations