Skip to main content

Musical Proportions at the Basis of Systems of Architectural Proportion both Ancient and Modern

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future
  • 3481 Accesses

Abstract

In architecture, systems of proportions facilitate technical and aesthetic requirements, ensure a repetition of ratios throughout the design, have additive properties that enable the whole to equal the sum of its parts, and are computationally tractable. Three systems of architectural proportion meet these requirements: a system used during Roman times, a system of musical proportions used during the Renaissance, and Le Corbusier’s Modulor. All three draw upon identical mathematical notions already present in the system of musical proportions. While the Roman system is based on the irrational numbers √2 and θ = 1 + √2, the Modulor is based on the Golden Mean, ϕ = (1 + √5)/2. Both can also be approximated arbitrarily closely (asymptotically) by integer series. Underlying the Roman system is the “law of repetition of ratios” and the geometrical construction known as the “Sacred Cut,” both of which geometric expressions of the additive properties of the Roman systems and ensure the presence of musical proportions. The discussion concludes with a system of “modular coordination” based on both musical proportions of Alberti and Fibonacci numbers.

First published as: Jay Kappraff , “Musical Proportions at the Basis of Systems of Architectural Proportion both Ancient and Modern”, pp. 115–133 in Nexus I: Architecture and Mathematics, ed. Kim Williams, Fucecchio (Florence): Edizioni dell’Erba, 1996.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further details of the musical scale built from these intervals, see Kappraff (1990: 9–12).

  2. 2.

    For studies of dynamic symmetry, see Hambidge (1967, 1979) and Edwards (1967).

  3. 3.

    This design appears in Edwards, Design with Dynamic Symmetry, Fig. 16, p. 25.

References

  • Alberti, Leon Battista. 1755. The Ten Books of Architecture. Rpt. NewYork: Dover Publications, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunés, Tons. 1967. The Secrets of Ancient Geometry – and Its Use. Copenhagen: Rhodos.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ossat, Guglielmo De Angelis. 1984. La Sagrestia Nuova. In Umberto Baldini and Bruno Nardini, eds. San Lorenzo. Florence: Nardini Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Edward B. 1967. Pattern and Design with Dynamic Symmetry. Originally published as Dynamarhythmic Design (1932). New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenkrantz, Ezra. 1956. Modular Number Pattern. London: Tiranti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambidge, Jay. 1967. The Elements of Dynamic Symmetry (1926). New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1979. The Fundamental Principles of Dynamic Symmetry as They are Expressed in Nature and Art Albequerque: Gloucester Art Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappraff, Jay. 1990. Connections: the Geometric Bridge between Art and Science. New York: McGraw–Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1996a. Linking the Musical Proportions of the Renaissance with the Modulor of Le Corbusier and the System of Roman Proportions. International Journal of Space Structures 11, 1 and 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1996b. Mathematics Beyond Measure: Essays in Nature, Myth, and Number. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholfield, P.H. 1958. The Theory of Proportion in Architecture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Donald .J. and Watts, Carol. M. 1986. Roman Apartment Complex. Scientific American 255, 6, (Dec. 1986): 132-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. 1994. The Sacred Cut Revisited: The Pavement of the Baptistry of San Giovanni, Florence. The Mathematical Intelligencer 16, 2 (Sp. 1994): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1997. Michelangelo’s Medici Chapel: The Cube, the Square, and the √2 Rectangle. Leonardo. Journal of the International Society of Arts, Sciences and Technology 30, 2 (1997): 105-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittkower, Rudolf. 1971. Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Kappraff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kappraff, J. (2015). Musical Proportions at the Basis of Systems of Architectural Proportion both Ancient and Modern. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00137-1_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics