Skip to main content

The Use of Cubic Equations in Islamic Art and Architecture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

An anonymous Persian work on ornamental geometry, On interlocks of similar or complementary figures, appears to have been compiled by a scribe at a series of meetings between mathematicians and artisans. This unusual document, which contains 68 geometric constructions mostly with verbal explanations, can be dated by internal evidence to ca. 1300. Some of those constructions display the highest advancements attained by Muslim mathematicians, and thus represent the intimate link between theory and praxis that created the intriguing and awe-inspiring ornamental patterns. Three constructions are the solutions to problems that require cubic equations. At the time, mathematicians solved cubic equations by means of conic sections, but such solutions were only for demonstration purposes with no practical application. These three constructions in Interlocks of Figures are the cases of “moving geometry,” that is, mechanical procedures that are equivalent to the solutions for cubic equations.

First published as: Alpay Özdural , “The Use of Cubic Equations in Islamic Art and Architecture”. Pp. 165–179 in Nexus IV: Architecture and Mathematics, Kim Williams and Jose Francisco Rodrigues, eds. Fucecchio (Florence): Kim Williams Books, 2002.

Alpay Özdural (1944–2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first part of the argument was first mentioned in (Holod 1988). For my publications on this point, see (Özdural 1995, 1996, 1998, 2000). Similar views are expressed in (Necipoğlu 1995: 167–175).

  2. 2.

    The only copy of this manuscript is preserved in Ms. Persan 169 in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, a compilation of twenty-five works on mathematical subjects, mainly practical geometry.

  3. 3.

    In this translation from the original Persian manuscript, simple restorations are added in square brackets; more detailed ones are explained in parentheses.

  4. 4.

    In Arabic, ‛aqd literally means knot. Here it is used to mean the unit to be repeated to generate an interlocking ornamental composition. To convey both meanings, I translate it as “knot pattern.”

  5. 5.

    It is assumed in the text that the length of segment GD is 1 and GA is x. Then perpendicular GE = 1, EK = 1, BD = x, BK = BG = 1 + x, EA = √(1 + x 2). Since AG:GE = AK : KB, we have x : 1 = [1 + √(1 + x 2)]:(1 + x). This equation can be reduced to x 3 + 2x 2−2x−2 = 0. The equation has one positive root, x = 1.1700865 accurate in seven decimals. I also compute the angles: tan ∠AEG = x, so ∠AEG = ∠B = 49.481553°, ∠A = 40.518447°, ∠AKG = ½∠AEG = 24.740777°.

  6. 6.

    In the figure of the original manuscript, the points that belong to the T-ruler and those used to perform the moving geometry were distinguished by red ink. Some of these were identical to the ones that were used for the pattern itself; and no differentiation was made in the text. In order to avoid the confusion they create, the letters written in red ink are distinguished here by adding stars above, both in the figure and the text.

  7. 7.

    In the original figure, the T-ruler is placed upon triangle GAB. The explanation in the text, however, makes sense only if the ruler is placed upon triangle GDB.

  8. 8.

    Assuming AC = 1, the following values are also computed for later use: AB = 0.543689, BD = 0.4563109, CB = 0.83922867, CD = 0.7044022, and AD = 0.2955977.

  9. 9.

    The following values are computed in addition to the ones in n. 16:GO = 0.7718445, CF = 0.5911954 = CB2.

  10. 10.

    For my detailed argument on this point, see (Özdural 1998: 699–715). The photogrammetric drawing and the dimensions obtained from Rassad Survey Company, “Masjed-e Jame‘Esfahan” (paper presented to the International Committee for Architectural Photogrammetry at the Symposium on the Photogrammetric Survey of Ancient Monuments, Athens, 1974, pl. 13), are published in ibid., Fig. 32.5.

References

  • Amir-Moéz, A. R. 1963. A Paper of Omar Khayyam. Scripta Mathematica, 26: pp. 323-337. New York: Yeshiva University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holod, R. 1988. Text, Plan, and Building: On the Transmission of Architectural Knowledge. Pp. 1-12 in M. Bentley Ševĉenko, ed. Theories and Principles of Design in the Architecture of Islamic Societies. Cambridge, Mass.: The Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture at Harvard Univ. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. 1982. The Grammar of Ornament: New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necipoğlu, G. 1995. The Topkapı Scroll—Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Santa Monica: The Getty Center for the History of Art and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdural, A. 1995. Omar Khayyam, Mathematicians, and Conversazioni with Artisans. Journal of the of the Society of Architectural Historians, 54, 1 (March): pp. 54-71. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. On Interlocking Similar or Corresponding Figures and Ornamental Patterns of Cubic Equations. Muqarnas, 13: pp. 191-211. Cambridge, Mass.: The Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture at Harvard Univ. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. A Mathematical Sonata for Architecture: Omar Khayyam and the Friday Mosque of Isfahan. Technology and Culture, 39, 4 (October): pp. 699-715. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Mathematics and Arts: Connections between Theory and Practice in the Medieval Islamic World. Historia Mathematica, 27, 2 (May): pp. 171-201. Sheffield: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, H., Ruska, J., Sarre, F. and Winderlich, R. 1935. Orientalische Steinbucher und Persische Fayencetechnik. Istanbul: Archäologischen Institutes des Deutschen Reiches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, E. 1938-1939. Seljuq Architecture. A Survey of Persian Art. A. Upham Pope & P. Ackerman, eds. Vol. III: p. 1005. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Özdural, A. (2015). The Use of Cubic Equations in Islamic Art and Architecture. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00137-1_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics