Methods for Interpretation of Data in Medical Informatics

  • Boris Mirkin
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 473)

Abstract

An outline of a few methods in an emerging field of data analysis, ”data interpretation”, is given as pertaining to medical informatics and being parts of a general interpretation issue. Specifically, the following subjects are covered: measuring correlation between categories, conceptual clustering, and generalization and interpretation of empirically derived concepts in taxonomies. It will be shown that all of these can be put as parts of the same inquiry.

Keywords

data analysis association between categories clustering hierarchical ontology taxonomy computational interpretation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Daniel, L.G.: Statistical Significance Testing: A Historical Overview of Misuse and Misinterpretation with Implications for the Editorial Policies of Educational Journals. Research in the Schools 5(2), 23–32 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C., Esposito, F.: Metric-based stochastic conceptual clustering for ontologies. Information Systems 34(8), 792–806 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García, M.M., Allones, J.L.I., Hernández, D.M., Taboada Iglesias, M.J.: Semantic similarity-based alignment between clinical archetypes and SNOMED CT: An application to observations. International Journal of Medical Informatics (Available online March 13 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joosse, S.A.: Two-proportion Z-test calculator (2011), http://in-silico.net/statistics/ztest
  5. 5.
    Ludwick, D.A., Doucette, J.: Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78(1), 22–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), American Psychiatric Association (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mirkin, B.: Grouping in Socio-Economic Research. Finansy I Statistika Publishers, Moscow (1985) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mirkin, B.: Eleven ways to look at the chi-squared coefficient for contingency tables. The American Statistician 55(2), 111–120 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mirkin, B.: Core Concepts in Data Analysis: Summarization, Correlation, Visualization. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirkin, B., Nascimento, S., Fenner, T., Felizardo, R.: How to Visualize a Crisp or Fuzzy Topic Set over a Taxonomy. In: Kuznetsov, S.O., Mandal, D.P., Kundu, M.K., Pal, S.K. (eds.) PReMI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6744, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rostovtsev, P.S., Mirkin, B.G.: Hierarchical grouping in socio-economic research. In: Mirkin [7], Section 5.4, pp. 126–133 (1985)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms) (2012), http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/snomed_main.html (visited May 27, 2012)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Mirkin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Data Analysis and Machine IntelligenceNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscow RFRussia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceBirkbeck University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations