Advertisement

Sound in Vibrating Cabins: Physical Effects, Mathematical Formulation, Computational Simulation with FEM

  • Frank Ihlenburg
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 505)

Abstract

The notion of sound is intuitively given by human perception. It is common knowledge that “audible” signals, originating at various sources of sound and propagating through an acoustic medium, are “picked up” by the human ear. The reaction of the eardrums to pressure changes in the air is an elementary example of vibroacoustic fluid-structure interaction. The sources of sound can be of different nature. These notes are concerned with the computational evaluation of the sound in thin-walled cabins like passenger compartments in cars, trains, ships, or airplanes. The walls of these cabins are in contact with an acoustic medium that fills the interior volume of the cabin (also called the acoustic cavity). By interaction between the fluid particles, the ocsillations at the structure-fluid interface spread through the cavity in the form of waves which are, in general, reflected at the boundaries. The interference of incoming and reflected waves may lead to resonant standing waves. This effect can be the cause for booming noise in vehicle cabins. It is the goal of vibroacoustic simulations to predict such unwanted effects and to explore design variants that are aimed at reducing the noise level over the frequency range of interest. Speaking more generally, the goal of the simulations consists in a realistic computational evaluation of the vibroacoustic comfort level. A basic knowledge of the underlying physical effects and their mathematical formulation is essential for the setup of suitable computational models as well as for the interpretation of the numerical results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    I. Babuška and S. Sauter, Is the pollution effect of the FEM avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave numbers? SIAM Review 42, 3 (2000), 451–484zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Bamberger, P. Joly, and J.E. Roberts, Second-order absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation: a solution for the corner problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 27, 2, 1990, 323–352zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K.-J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice-Hall, 1996Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. de Batist, Internal Friction of Structural Defects in Crystalline Solids (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Niederlande), 1972Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.A. Biot: Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid, part 1, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28 (1956), 168–178.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.B. Bliss, Study of bulk reacting porous sound absorbers and a new boundary condition for thin porous layers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 533–544, 1982zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    D.B. Bliss and S.E. Burke, Experimental investigation of the bulk reaction boundary condition, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71 (3), 546–551, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Cabos and F. Ihlenburg, Vibrational analysis of ships with coupled finite and boundary elements, J. Comp. Acoustics 11 (2003), 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Cessenat and B. Despres, Application of an ultra weak formulation of elliptic PDEs to the 2-dimensional Helmholtz Problem, SIAM J. Numer. Analysis 35 (1), 1998, 255–299zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. Cremer and L. Heckl, Structure-Borne Sound, Springer-Verlag Berlin 1973Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Crighton et al., Modern Methods in Analytical Acoustics, Springer Verlag London, 1992Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    L. Demkowicz, Computing with hp-adaptive Finite Elements, Chapman & Hall Boca Raton 2006Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    W.C. Elmore and M.A. Heald, Physics of Waves, Dover Publications Inc., New York 1985Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    B. Enquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, Math. Comp. 31 (1977), pp. 629–651CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J.J. de Espandola and J. M. da Silva Neto, Identification of flexural stiffness parameters of beams, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 23, 2001Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    F. Fahy, Foundations of Engineering Acoustics, Academic Press, London 2001Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Ch. Farhat, I. Harari, and U. Hetmaniuk, A discontinuous Galerkin method with Lagrange multipliers for the solution of Helmholtz problems in the mid-frequency regime, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., Volume 192, 11–12, 2003, 1389–1419zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. N. Guddati and B. Yue, Modified integration rules for reducing dispersion error in finite element methods, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 193, 3–5, 2004, 275–287zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, Galerkin/least-squares finite element methods for the reduced wave equation with non-reflecting boundary conditions in unbounded domains, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 98, 3 (1992), 411–454zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    N.E. Hörlin, M. Nordström, and P. Göransson, A 3-D hierarchical FE formulation of Biot’s equations for elasto-acoustic modelling of porous media, J. Sound. Vibr. (2001), 4, 633–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Ihlenburg, Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering, Springer Verlag New York, 1998zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F. Ihlenburg, The medium-Frequency range in computational acoustics: practical and numerical Aspects, J. Comp. Acoustics, 11 (2), 2003, 175–194.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    F. Ihlenburg, A. Kropp, and R. Stryczek, Acoustic radiation from steel panels with damping layers, Int. Congress Sound Vibr. Stockholm 2003Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    D.J. Inman, Engineering Vibration, 2nd edition, Prentice-Hall 2003Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Käferstein, B., Reduction of structural sound in thin-walled steel structures (in German), Forschungsvereinigung Stahlanwendung e.V. im Stahl-Zentrum, Düsseldorf 2004Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    L.A. Kinsler, A.R. Frey, A.B. Coppens, and J.V. Sanders, Fundamentals of Acoustics, Third Edition, J. Wiley, New York 1982Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Krenk, S., Damping mechanisms and models in structural dynamics, in: Structural Dynamics, EURODYN, pp. 87–98, 2002Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    A. Kropp and F. Ihlenburg, Influence of local damping on the acoustic design of passenger cars, Autotechnology 4/2004Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    MATLAB®, http://www.mathworks.com/Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    J. M. Melenk and I. Babuška, The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 139, 1–4, 1996, 289–314zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    MSC. Nastran 2001, Users Guide, Santa Ana 2001Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    A.D. Pierce, Acoustics, An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York 1981Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    S.S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations, Third Edition, Addison-Wesley, 1995Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    K. Schladitz, S. Peters, D. Reinel-Bitzer, A. Wiegmann, and J. Ohser: Design of acoustic trim based on geometric modeling and flow simulation for nonwoven, Technical Report 72, 2005, ITWM KaiserslauternGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    L. A. Segel, Mathematics applied to continuum mechanics, Dover 1987Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    E. Skudrzyk, The Foundations of Acoustics, Basic Mathematics and Basic Acoustics, Springer-Verlag Wien New York, 1971zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Th. Strouboulis, R. Hidajat, and I. Babuška, The generalized finite element method for Helmholtz equation: Theory, computation, and open problems Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., Volume 195, 37–40, 2006, 4711–4731zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    B. Szabo and I. Babuška, Finite Element Analysis, J. Wiley 1991Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    H. Thorwald and E. Langbecker, Damping properties of ship structures, Research Report (in German), Ingenieurzentrum Schiffbau GmbH, Rostock 1993Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    CDH/VAO, Users Manual, Ingolstadt 2004Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    L. Witta, An interactive tool for the computational modal analysis and optimisation of coupled structure-fluid systems (in German), Dissertation, TU München, Munich 2000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Ihlenburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations