Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Tort and Insurance Law ((TIL,volume 24))

  • 581 Accesses

Abstract

There are no specific rules on liability or compensation of damage relating to GMO crops. Obviously, there have been some proposals originating from stakeholders that liability issues should indeed be dealt with and that some compensation scheme should be put in place.1 No political action has been taken until now. Therefore, the common rules of private tort law apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refarences

  1. See Coëxistentie_Primaire Sector — Rapportage van de tijdelijke commissie onder voor-zitters-chapvan J. van Dijk; commissiepartijen: Biologica, LTO Nederland, Plantum NL en Platform Aarde Boer Consument, The Hague, November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoge Raad (HR) 20. 3. 1970, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie (NJ) 1970, 251, Waterwingebied.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See generally W.H. van Boom/ C.E. du Perron, The Netherlands, in: B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability (2002) 227–255.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Notitie_Ministerie van Justifie—Aansprakelijkheid voor schade in het kader van coëxistentie van gg-gewassen en conventionele en biologische gewassen, in: Coëxistentie Primaire Sector — Rapportage van de tijdelijke commissie onder voor-zitterschap van J. van Dijk; commissiepartijen: Biologica, LTO Nederland, Plantum NL en Platform Aarde Boer Consument, The Hague, November 2004, B57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also, Notitie Ministerie van Justifie (supra fn. 5) B57 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See HR 18-4-1986, NJ 1986, no. 567. For further details, see, e.g., W.H. van Boom, Pure economic loss in the Netherlands — the case study, in: M. Bussani/ V. Palmer (eds.), Pure Economic Loss in Europe (2003) 171–522 with further references.

    Google Scholar 

  7. On art. 6:101 Civil Code, see, e.g., W.H. van Boom, Contributory Negligence under Dutch Law, in: U. Magnus/ M. Martín-Casals (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (2004) 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See A.S. Hartkamp, Verbintenissenrecht; deel I — De verbintenis in het algemeen [Mr. C. Asser’s handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk recht] (11th ed. 2000) no. 494.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Besluit financiële zekerheid milieubeheer, in: Staatsblad 2003 no. 71, based on art. 8.15 Wet milieubeheer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Notitie Ministerie van Justifie (omin: Coëxistentie Primaire Sector — Rapportage van de tijdelijke commissie onder voor-zitterschap van J. van Dijk; commissiepartijen: Biologica, LTO Nederland, Plantum NL en Platform Aarde Boer Consument, The Hague, November 2004 supra fn. 5) B56 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See HR 11.7. 2003, NJ 2005, no. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, generally, Wet Conflictenrecht Onrechtmatige daad (Statute on the private international law aspects of tortious liability) art. 3 subsection 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Bernhard A. Koch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Castillo, M.M., van Boom, W.H. (2008). Economic Loss Caused by GMOs in the Netherlands. In: Koch, B.A. (eds) Economic Loss Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 24. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77988-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77988-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-77987-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-77988-0

Publish with us

Policies and ethics