Skip to main content

Wrongful Death — Basic Questions

  • Chapter
Book cover European Tort Law 2006

Part of the book series: Tort and Insurance Law ((TILY,volume 2006))

  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

It goes without saying that the wrongful injury of a person, the victim, by another, the tortfeasor, always raises interesting questions for a lawyer. Not only is he faced with all the problems regarding the prerequisites for establishing the tortfeasor’s liability, but he also has to think about which harm has to be compensated and to what extent, thus also which methods of calculation have to be used, e.g. objective or subjective yardsticks. All these problems are —you might say — in the normal scope of tort law. Cases of wrongful death, however, highlight some particular legal aspects: It is not the victim himself who claims because he is already in a better world and does not feel the consequences of his death. As the person who suffered the injury no longer exists, at stake are primarily — at least at first sight — not his losses and his compensation but the harm suffered by the surviving dependents and their compensation. We will see that to some extent another classification seems possible and reasonable. But at any rate, in regard of compensation, we have to take into account that under no circumstances will the victim himself but third persons claim and be awarded damages and that, therefore, ultimately not the interests of the victim himself but of third persons seem to be decisive.

I would like to thank Donna Stockenhuber for proof-reading the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol, Comparative Analysis, in: B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003) no. 40 ff. with references to the country reports.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. H. Koziol, Comparative Analysis, in: B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003) ibid., no. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See H. Koziol, Comparative Analysis, in: B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspectiveibid. , no. 53 ff; W.V.H. Rogers, Comparative Report, in: W.V.H. Rogers (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (2001) no. 4, all with references to the country reports.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In this sense the country reports by E. Karner/ H. Koziol, Austria no. 46; H. Cousy/D. Droshout, Belgium no. 28 f.; S. Galand-Carval, France no. 41; U. Magnus/J. Fedtke, Germany no. 14; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands no. 30; M. Martin-Casals/J. Ribot/J. Solé, Spain no. 34 ff.; all in: W.V.H. Rogers (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (2001). Disapproving W.V.H. Rogers, England, in: W.V.H. Rogers (ed.), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (2001) no. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wissink/ Van Boom (fn. 4) no. 27; M. Martin-Casals/J. Ribot/J. Solé, Compensation for Personal Injury in Spain, in: B.A. Koch/H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003) no. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Before 1996, the Austrian Supreme Court (SZ 69/217 = Juristische Blätter 1997, 40) decided that the surviving dependants are entitled to such claim. Cf. to the different opinions in Italy F.D. Busnelli/ G. Comandé, Italy, in: B.A. Koch/ H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003) no. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See F. Bydlinski, System und Prinzipien des Privatrechts (1996) 190 ff.; H. Koziol, österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht I (3rd ed. 1997) no. 1/15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Mataja, Das Recht des Schadenersatzes vom Standpunkt der Nationalökonomie (1888) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, e.g., M. Adams, ökonomische Analyse der Gefährdungs-und Verschuldenshaftung (1985); H.-B. Schäfer/C. Ott, Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts (3rd ed. 2000), both with further details, founded on the fundamental studies of G. Calabresi, The Costs of Accidents (1970); R.H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics 1960, 1, und R.H. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (5th ed. 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. This is at least true for all legal systems which have been taken into consideration in Koch/ Koziol (fn. l) no. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.H. van Boom, Pure Economic Loss: A Comparative Perspective, in: W.H. van Boom/ H. Koziol/ Ch.A. Witting (eds.), Pure Economic Loss (2004) no. 1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Ch.A. Witting, Compensation for Pure Economic Loss from a Common Lawyer’s Perspective no. 51; H. Koziol, Compensation for Pure Economic Loss from a Continental Lawyer’s Perspective no. 52; both in: W.H. van Boom/H. Koziol/Ch.A. Witting (eds.), Pure Economic Loss (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Boom (fn. 11) no. 60 and 75 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koch/ Koziol (fn. 1) no. 66 with references to the country reports.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See H. McGregor, Personal Injury and Death, in: International Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law XI (1983), chap. 9, no. 207; W.V.H. Rogers, Compensation for Personal Injury in England, in: B.A. Koch/H. Koziol (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in a Comparative Perspective (2003) no. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. H. Koziol, Recovery for Economic Loss in the European Union, Arizona Law Review 48 (2006) 885.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Critical to such reasoning P. Apathy, Fiktive Operationskosten, österreichische Richterzeitung 1986, 256; H. Koziol, Die Tötung im Schadenersatzrecht, in: Liber Amicorum Pierre Widmer (2003) 210 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This seems to be the solution under Japanese law, cf. H.P. Marutschke, Einführung in das japanische Recht (1999) 189 f.; K. Nitta, Die Berechnung des Schadens beim Unfalltod eines minderjährigen Kindes, Recht in Japan 8 (1998) 80 ff.; H. Stall, Der Tod als Schadensfall, in: E. von Caemmerer (ed.), J. Zepos-FS II (1973) 686.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.D. Busnelli, II danno biologico dal “diritto vivente” al “diritto vigente” (2001); G. Bender, Personenschaden und Schadensbegriff. Rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zur neueren Entwicklung des Personenschadensrechts in Italien (1993); G. Christandl, Eine kurze Darstellung der neuesten Entwicklungen im italienischen Nichtvermögensschadensrecht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des danno esistenziale, in: S. Patti/U. Stein/S. Bariatti/C. Becker/L. Salazar/K. Nehm, Klauselrichtlinie Mobiliarsicherheiten Strafverfolgung, Jahrbuch für Italienisches Recht vol. 18 (2005) 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Adams, ökonomische Analyse (2nd ed. 2004) 174 ff; H. Kötz/G. Wagner, Deliktsrecht (10th ed. 2006) no. 737 ff.; Schäfer/Ott (fn. 9) 349 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Ch. von Bar, Gemeineuropäisches Deliktsrecht II (1999) 61; H. Stall, Haftungsfolgen im bürgerlichen Recht (1993) 359.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For more details see Koziol (fn. 18) 212 f.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. ibid, 217 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koch/ Koziol (fn. l) no. 69 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  25. In more detail E. Karner, Rechtsprechungswende bei Schock-und Fernwirkungsschäden, Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 1998, 182 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cf. Koziol (fn. 18) 215 ff.; E. Karner/H. Koziol, Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens im österreichischen Recht und seine Reform, Verhandlungen des 15. österreichischen Juristentags (2003) 67 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Helmut Koziol Barbara C. Steininger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koziol, H. (2008). Wrongful Death — Basic Questions. In: Koziol, H., Steininger, B.C. (eds) European Tort Law 2006. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 2006. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77572-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics