Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Gesundheit und Neue Medien pp 277–296Cite as

Einblicke in Online-Research — Das Internet als Medium zur Datenerhebung

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Mit dem Begriff Online-Research wird im weitesten Sinn die Datenerhebung in computerbasierten Netzwerken bezeichnet (Batinic, 2004), also die Nutzung von Erhebungsverfahren, die das Internet auf irgendeine Weise als Medium nützen. Ein einheitlicher Begriff für die Forschung mit Hilfe des Internets hat sich noch nicht eingebürgert, Bezeichnungen wie web— oder internetbasierte Erhebungen oder Online-Untersuchungen werden ebenfalls verwendet. Online-Research kann grundsätzlich in allen Bereichen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung stattfinden. (2005) zählen unter anderem folgende Erscheinungsformen auf:

  • Grundlagen- und angewandte Forschung

  • Quantitative und qualitative Forschung

  • Deskriptive, hypothesentestende und-entwickelnde Forschung

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

10. Literatur

  • Bailey R. D., Foote W. E. & Throckmorton B. (2000). Human Sexual Behavior: A Comparison of College and Internet Surveys. In: Birnbaum M. H. (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 141–168). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batinic B. (2004). Online-Research. In: Mangold R., Vorderer P. & Bente G. (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Medienpsychologie (S. 251–270). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batinic B. & Bosnjak M. (2000). Fragebogenuntersuchungen im Internet. In B. Batinic (Hrsg.), Internet für Psychologen (2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage) (S. 287–317). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman S., Johnson E. J., Kobrin S. J. & Lohse G. L. (2004). Regional Differences in Privacy Preferences, Implications for the Globalization of Electronic Commerce. The Information Society, 20 (5), 313–324. Verfügbar unter: http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/journals/files/chazen/Info_Privacy.pdf [25.07.2006].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Kewley S., Edwards J. E. & Rosenfeld P. (1992). Impression Management, Social Desirability, and Computer administration of Attitude Questionnaires: Does the Computer Make a Difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (4), 562–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Kewley S., Larson G. E. & Miyoshi D. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computer in Human Behavior, 23 (1) 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J. & Döring N. (2002). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak M. (2001). Participation in Non-Restricted Web Surveys: A Typology and Explanatory Model for Item None-Response. In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 193–208). Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brengman M., Geuens M., Weijters B., Smith S. M., Swinyard, W. R. (2005). Segmenting Internet shoppers based on their Web-usage-related lifestyle: a cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Research, 58, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper M. P., Kapteyn A., Schonlau M. & Winter J. (2007). Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey. Social Science Research, 36 (1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillmann A. D. & Bowker D. K. (2001). The Web Questionnaire Challenge to Survey

    Google Scholar 

  • Methodologists . In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 159–179). Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillmann A. D., Singer E., Clark J. R. & Treat J. B. (1994). Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals and Variations in Statements of Confidentiality on Completion Rates for Census Questionnaires. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section ASA, 1333–1338. Verfügbar unter: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/ Proceedings/papers/1994_234.pdf[25.06.2006].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillmann A. D., Singer E., Clark J. R. & Treat J. B. (1996). Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals and Variations in Statements of Confidentiality on Completion Rates for Census Questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60 (3), 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döring N. (2003): Sozialpsychologie des Internet. Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitäten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdfelder E., Faul F. & Buchner A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach G., Powell J., Englesakis M. & Stern A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328, 1166–1170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frick A., Bächtiger M. T. & Reips U.-D. (1999). Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Drop-Out Rate in Online Studies. In: Reips U.-D., Batinic B., Bandilla W., Bosnjak M., Gräf L., Moser K. & Werner A. (Eds.), Current Internet Science, Trends, Techniques, Results. Verfügbar unter: http://www.dgof.de/tband99/pdfs/a_h/frick.pdf[04.07.2006]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker S., Galesic M., Tourangeau R. & Yan T. (2005). An Experimental Comparision of Web and Telephone Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69 (3), 370–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R. J. & Katz J. E. (2000). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Self-Reported Values. Psychology & Marketing, 17 (2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnambs T. & Strassnig B. (2007). Experimentelle Online-Untersuchungen. In: Welker M. & Wenzel O. (Hrsg.), Online-Forschung 2007 — Grundlagen und Fallstudien (S. 233–251). Köln: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göritz A. S. (2006). Incentives in Web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1(1), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göritz A. S. & Birnbaum M. H. (2005). Generic HTML Form Processor: A versatile PHP Script to save Web-collected data into a MySQL database. Behavior Research Methods, 37 (4), 703–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haley K. J. & Fessler D. M. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity ain an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock D. R. & Flowers, C. P. (2003). The World Wide Web’s Effect on Social Desirability Responding: An Investigation of the Motivation of Survey-Takers. International Journal on E-Learning, 2 (3), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmanns P. (1999). Grenzen und Chancen von quantitativen Befragungen mit Hilfe des Internets. In: Batinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research: Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 277–295). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31 (3), 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp F. & Heidingsfelder M. (2001). Drop-Out Analysis: Effects of Research Design. In: Reips U.-D. & Bosnjak M. (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science (pp. 221–230). Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager G. J. & Flaherty V. L. (1990). Computer Administration of Questions: More Desirable or More Social Desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (3), 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippe P. von Der & Kladroba A. (2002). Repräsentativität von Stichproben. Marketing, 24, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey H. D. (1981). Methoden und Probleme der Kontrolle sozialer Erwünschtheit (Social Desirability). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 2 (3), 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musch J. & Reips U.-D. (2000). A Brief History of Web Experimenting. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 61–88). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goeritz A. (2006). Incentives in Web Studies: Methodological Issues and a Review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1 (1), pp. 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof A. J. (1984). Visibility of response as a mediating factor in equity research. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 211–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil K. M. & Penrod S. D. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33 (2), 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reips U.-D. (2000). The Web Experiment Method: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Solutions. In: Birnbaum M. H. (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 89–117). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reips U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4), 243–256.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reips U.-D. & Neuhaus C. (2002). WEXTOR: A Web-based tool for generating and visualizing experimental designs and procedures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 234–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes S. D., Bowie D. A. & Hergenrather K. C. (2003). Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 68–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer D. R., & Dillman D. A. (1998). Development of standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62 (3), 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiano D. J. (1997). Convergent methodologies in cyber-psychology: A case study. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29 (2), 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29 (2), 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W. C. (2000). The Server Side of Psychology Web Experiments. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological Experiments on the Internet (pp. 285–310). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon D. & Bradshaw C. (2002). A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70 (2), 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer E. (2003). Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs about Risks and Benefits. Journal of Official Statistics, 19 (3), 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer E., Hippler H.-J. & Schwarz N. (1992). Confidentiality Assurances in Surveys: Reassurance or Threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4 (3), 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer E., Mathiowetz N. A. & Couper M. P. (1993). The impact of privacy and confidentiality Concerns on survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (5), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassnig B. (2007). Subjective Anonymity in Online-Surveys. Vortrag, 9. Tagung für General Online-Research (GOR 07), Leizig, Deutschland, (28.–28.03.2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz S. (1999). Untersuchungsformen in MUDs. In: Bantinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 305–318). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welker M., Werner A. & Scholz J. (2005). Online-Research. Markt-und Sozialforschung im Internet. Heidelberg: dpunkt.verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welker M. (2007). Was ist Online-Forschung? Eine Tour d’horizon zu einem erfolgreichen Forschungsfeld. In: Welker M. & Wenzel O. (Hrsg.), Online-Forschung 2007 — Grundlagen und Fallstudien (S. 19–51). Köln: Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner A. (1999). Kontaktmessung im WWW. In: Bantinic B., Werner A., Gräf L. & Bandilla W. (Hrsg.), Online-Research. Methoden, Anwendungen und Ergebnisse (S. 227–244). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (3). Verfügbar unter: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/wright.html [23.06.2006].

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun G. W., & Trumbo C. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, and web form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Verfügbar unter: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html [26.07.2006].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe W. J. & Paulhus D. L. (1987). Socially Desirable Responding on Organizational Behavior: A Reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12 (2), 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Psychologie, Liebiggasse 5, 1010, Wien, Österreich

    Barbara Strassnig

Authors
  1. Barbara Strassnig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Strassnig .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strassnig, B. (2009). Einblicke in Online-Research — Das Internet als Medium zur Datenerhebung. In: Gesundheit und Neue Medien. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-72015-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation