Skip to main content

Endoscopic Ultrasonography on Gallbladder and Biliary Tract

  • Chapter
Liver and Biliary Tract Surgery
  • 3139 Accesses

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has recently emerged as a very reliable imaging modality for the pancreaticobiliary system. Apart from other applications, EUS is a minimally invasive imaging technique which is widely used all over the world for identifying biliary abnormalities. Lesions as small as 2 to 3 mm in diameter, can be visualized by EUS. In France, 48.039 EUS procedures were performed during 1999, 58% of which related to pancreaticobiliary diseases [1]. In a recent series in a center where EUS is currently available, the rate of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPS) was only 9.5% in a total of 1,159 ERCP procedures [2]. Recent years have seen new technical developments recorded in the field of EUS

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fournet J, Dhumeaux D. L’endoscopie. In: Masson (ed). The Livre Blanc de l’Hepato-gastroenterologie. Paris, France, 2001:155–157.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barthet M, Lasaure N, Desjeux A, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 2002; 34:991–997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Niwa K, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. Preliminary study of endoscopic ultrasonography with electronic radial scanning echoendoscope. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18:828–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Röesch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography: equipment and technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2005; 15:13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, et al. Wire-guided intraductal US: an adjunt to ERCP in the management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:31–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Norton ID, Jones DB. Endoscopic ultrasound: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Intern Med J 2003; 33:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasonography with a curved array transducer: Normal echoanatomy of the retroperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1995; 5:523–528.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rösch T, Classen M. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the retroperitoneal organs. In: Sivak M (ed): Gastroenterologic Endoscopy. 2nd ed., Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 2000; 1183–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones; comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:225–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prat F, Amougal G, Amoyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996; 347:75–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasanen A, Partanen K, Pikkarainen PH, et al. A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis. Eur J Surg 1993; 159:23–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pedersen ON, Nordgard K, Kvinnsland S. Value of sonography in obstructive jaundice. Limitations of bile duct caliber as an index of obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol 1987; 22: 975–981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JH, Salem R, Aslanian H, Chacho M, Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 30:1069–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fusaroli P, Caletti G. Present and future of endoscopic ultrasonography. Digestive and Liver Disease 2005; 37:142–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Levy P, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 1061–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aubertin JM, Levoir D, Bouillot JL, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography immediately prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective evaluation. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 667–673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 143–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Canto MI, Chak A, Stellato T, Sivak MV Jr. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47:439–448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier A, et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter prospective controlled study. Surgery 1998; 124:6–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chak A, Hawes RH, Cooper GS, et al. Prospective assessment of the utility of EUS in the evaluation of gallstone pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:599–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Napoleon B, Dumortier J, Keriven-Souquet O, et al. Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients. Endoscopy 2003; 35:411–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohut M, Nowak A, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, et al. Endosonography with linear array instead of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the diagnostic tool in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9:612–614.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D, et al. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis; do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:510–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JK, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:325–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lachter J, Rubin A, Shiller M, et al. Linear EUS for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51:51–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:2900–2904.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burtin P. Cout-efficacite de differentes strategies diagnostiques et therapeutiques dans la lithiase de la voie biliaire principale. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1998; 22:B30–B38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PA, Durup J, Pless TK, Mortensen MP. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Endoscopy 2003; 35:1029–1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancratography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broermg DC, Knoefel WT, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J 2004; 99:45–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Meroni E, Bisagni P, Bona S, et l. Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography can optimize the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocholithiasis: a prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36:73–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Eloubeidi MA, Clien VK, Jhala NC, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 99: 1069–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Byrne MF, Gerke H, Mitchell RM, et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of bile duct lesions. Endoscopy 2004; 36:715–719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rösch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S, el al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 870–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamada K, Kanai N, Tomiyama T el al. Prediction of the histologic type of bile duct cancer by using intraductal ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24:484–490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer P, el al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:1684–1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kahaleli M, Yoshida c, Kane L, Yeaton P. Interventional EUS cholangiography: a report of five cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Erickson RA, Gazza AA. EUS with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration as the first endoscopic test for the evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:475–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:1087–1095.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Giovannini M, Dotti M, Bories E, et al. Hepaticogastrostomy by echo-endoscopy as a palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 2003; 33: 1070–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rösch T, Braig C, Gain T, et al. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography and angiography. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 188–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fugino MA, Morozumi A, Ikeda M, et al. Diagnosis of carcinoma of the major duodenal papilla by endoscopic ultrasonography [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1991; 100:316.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mitake M, Nakazawa S, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of depth invasion and lymph node metastasis of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9:645–650.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Skordilis P, Mouzas IA, Dimoulios PD, et al. Is endosonography an effective method for detection and local staging of the ampullary carcinoma? A prospective study. BMC Surg 2002; 2:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rösch T, Dittler HJ, Lorenz R, et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of tumors of the papilla of Vater [Abstract]. J Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38:259.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Palazzo L. Staging of pancreatic carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 1992; 102:188–199.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Midwinter MJ, Beveridge CJ, Wilsdon JB, et al. Correlation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumors. Br J Surg 1999; 86:189–193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cannon ME, Carpenter SL, Ella GH, et al. EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms. Gastroiniest Endosc 1999; 50:27–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Shoup M, Hodul P, Aranha GV, et al. Defining a role for endoscopic ultrasound in staging periampullary tumors. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 453–456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schwarz M. Pauls S, Sokiranski R. et al. Is a preoperative multidiagnostic approach to predict surgical resectability of periampullary tumors still effective? Am J Surg 2001; 182: 243–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen CH, Tseng LJ, Yang CC, Yeh YH. Preoperative evaluation of periampullary tumors by endoscopic sonography, transabdominal sonography and computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound 2001; 29: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rivadeneira DE, Pochapin M, Grobmyer SR, et al. Comparison of linear array endoscopic ultrasound and helical computed tomography for the staging of periampullary malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:890–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Maluf-Filho F, Sakai P, Cunha JE, et al. Radial endoscopic ultrasound and spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis and staging of periampullary tumors. Pancreatology 2004; 4:122–128.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rösch T, Schsdaziorre V, Born P, et al. Modern imaging methods versus clinical assessment in the evaluation of hospital inpatients with suspected pancreatic disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2261–2270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ahmad NA, Lewis JD, Ginsberg GG, et al. EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer. Gostrointest Endosc 2000; 52:163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rösch T, Dittler HJ, Strobel K, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound criteria for vascular invasion in the staging of cancer of the head of the pancreas: a blind reevaluation of videotapes. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:469–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rösch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography: imaging and beyond. Gut 2003; 52:1220–1226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rösch T, Dennig V. A prospective assessment of complications and patient acceptance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasonography: a multicenter study in 2,500 patients [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51:177.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rösch T, Dittler HJ, Fockens P, Vasuda K, Lightdale CJ. Major complications of endoscopic ultrsaonography: Results of a survey of 42,105 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: A341.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Raut CP, Grau AM, Staerkel GA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7:118–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Das A, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A. Cervical esophageal perforation during EUS: a National survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:599–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goumas, K., Poulou, A. (2006). Endoscopic Ultrasonography on Gallbladder and Biliary Tract. In: Karaliotas, C.C., Broelsch, C.E., Habib, N.A. (eds) Liver and Biliary Tract Surgery. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-49277-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-49277-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-49275-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-49277-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics