Skip to main content

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery: the Brigham concept

  • Chapter
Medical Technologies in Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 98))

Summary

The resection of brain tumors is limited by the surgeon’ s ability to precisely define margins. To overcome this problem, various neuronavigational tools have been used. The development of imageguided navigation systems represents a substantial improvement in the microsurgical treatment of various intracranial lesions. However, a major drawback of this technology is that they use images acquired preoperatively, on which the surgical planning and intraoperative performance is based. As the intracranial anatomy dynamically changes during a neurosurgical procedure, only intraoperatively acquired images can provide the neurosurgeon with the information needed to perform real-time, image-guided surgery. Because magnetic resonance imaging best delineates the soft-tissue extent of most tumors, it currently remains the superior method for intraoperative image guidance. In this review, we outline the development as well as current and possible future applications of the intraoperative MRI (iMRI) unit at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albayrak B, Samdani AF, Black PM (2004) Intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146: 543–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Albert FK, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams HP, Kunze S (1994) Early post-operative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 34: 45–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Apuzzo ML, Sabshin JK (1983) Comuputed tomographic guidance stereotaxis in the management of intracranial mass lesions. Neurosurgery 12: 277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett GH (1999) The role of image-guided technology in the surgical planning and resection of gliomas. J Neurooncol 42: 247–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, Brandner S, Meier S, Yonekawa Y (2002) Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114_consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 97: 354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Black PM, Alexander E 3rd, Martin C, Moriarty T, Nabavi A, Wong TZ, Schwartz RB, Jolesz F (1999) Craniotomy for tumor treatment in an intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging unit. Neurosurgery 45: 423–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bohinski RJ, Warnick RE, Gaskill-Shipley MF, Zuccarello M, van Loveren HR, Kormos DW, Tew JM Jr (2001) Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to determine the extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during transsphenoidal microsurgery. Neurosurgery 49: 1133–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Claus EB, Horlacher A, Hsu L, Schwartz RB, Dello-Iacono D, Talos F, Jolesz FA, Black PM (2005) Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 103: 1227–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall WA, Truwit CL (2005) Intraoperative MR imaging.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13: 533–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartkens T, Hill DL, Castellano-Smith AD, Hawkes DJ, Maurer CR Jr, Martin AJ, Hall WA, Liu H, Truwit CL (2003) Measurement and analysis of brain deformation during neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22: 82–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hein PA, Eskey CJ, Dunn JF, Hug EB (2004) diffusionweighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. Am J Neuroradiol 25: 201–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschberg H, Samset E, Hol PK, Tillung T, Lote K (2005) Impact of intraoperative MRI on the surgical results for high-grade gliomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 48: 77–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jolesz FA, Morrison PR, Koran SJ, Kelley RJ, Hushek SG, Newman RW, Fried MP, Melzer A, Seibel RM, Jalahej H (1998) Compatible instrumentation for intraoperative MRI: expanding resources. J Magn Reson Imaging 8: 8–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jolesz FA, Shtern F (1992) The operating room of the future. Report of the national cancer institute workshop, imagingguided stereotactic tumor diagnosis and treatment. Invest Radio 27: 326–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanal E, Shellock FG (1992) Patient monitoring during clinical MR imaging. Radiology 185: 623–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karlik SJ, Heatherley T, Pavan F, Stein J, Lebron F, Rutt B, Carey L, Wexler R, Gelb A (1988) Patient anesthesia and monitoring at a 1.5-T MRI installation. Magn Reson Med 7: 210–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeler EK, Casey FX, Engels H, Lauder E, Pirto CA, Reisker T, Rogers J, Schaefer DJ, Tynes T (1998) Accessory equipment considerations with respect to MRI compatibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 8: 12–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly PJ (1990) Image-directed tumor resection. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1: 81–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nabavi A, Gering DT, Kacher DF, Talos IF, Wells WM, Kikinis R, Black PM, Jolesz FA (2003) Surgical navigation in the open MRI. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 85: 121–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nimsky C, Fujita A, Ganslandt O, Von Keller B, Fahlbusch R (2004) Volumetric assessment of glioma removal by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 55: 358–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schenck JF, Jolesz FA, Roemer PB, Cline HE, Lorensen WE, Kikinis R, Silverman SG, Hardy CJ, Barber WD, Laskaris ET, et al (1995) Superconducting open-configuration MR imaging system for image-guided therapy. Radiology 195: 805–814

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz RB, Carvalho PA, Alexander E 3rd, Loeffler JS, Folkerth R, Holman BL (1991) Radiation necrosis vs high-grade recurrent glioma: differentiation by using dual-isotope SPECT with 201Tl and 99mTc-HMPAO. Am J Neuroradiol 12: 1187–1192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Black PM, Alexander E 3rd, Wong TZ, Klufas RA, Moriarty T, Martin C, Isbister HG, Cahill CD, Spaulding SA, Kanan AR, Jolesz FA (1998) Evaluation of intracranial cysts by intraoperative MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:807–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Wong TZ, Kacher DF, Zamani AA, Black PM, Alexander E 3rd, Stieg PE, Moriarty TM, Martin CA, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA (1999) Intraoperative MR imaging guidance for intracranial neurosurgery: experience with the first 200_cases. Radiology 211: 477–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shellock FG, Kanal E (1996) Burns associated with the use of monitoring equipment during MR procedures. J Magn Reson Imaging 6: 271–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shellock FG, Kanal E (1994) Guidelines and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. III. Questionnaire for screening patients before MR procedures. The SMRI Safety Committee. J Magn Reson Imaging 4: 749–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, Khorasani R, Adams DF, Newman RW, Topulos GP, Jolesz FA (1995) Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 197: 175–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Spivak CJ, Pirouzmand F (2005) Comparison of the reliability of brain lesion localization when using traditional and stereotactic image-guided techniques: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 103: 424–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wendt RE 3rd, Rokey R, Vick GW 3rd, Johnston DL (1988) Electrocardiographic gating and monitoring in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 6: 89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittal, S., Black, P.M. (2006). Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery: the Brigham concept. In: Nimsky, C., Fahlbusch, R. (eds) Medical Technologies in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 98. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33303-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33303-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-33302-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-33303-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics