Therapeutic potential of computer to cerebral cortex implantable devices

Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 97/2)

Abstract

In this article, an overview of some of the latest developments in the field of cerebral cortex to computer interfacing (CCCI) is given. This is posed in the more general context of Brain-Computer Interfaces in order to assess advantages and disadvantages. The emphasis is clearly placed on practical studies that have been undertaken and reported on, as opposed to those speculated, simulated or proposed as future projects. Related areas are discussed briefly only in the context of their contribution to the studies being undertaken. The area of focus is notably the use of invasive implant technology, where a connection is made directly with the cerebral cortex and/or nervous system. Tests and experimentation which do not involve human subjects are invariably carried out a priori to indicate the eventual possibilities before human subjects are themselves involved. Some of the more pertinent animal studies from this area are discussed. The paper goes on to describe human experimentation, in which neural implants have linked the human nervous system bidirectionally with technology and the internet. A view is taken as to the prospects for the future for CCCI, in terms of its broad therapeutic role.

Keywords

Neuromodulation brain-computer interface biological systems implant technology feedback control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Branner A, Normann R (2000) A multielectrode array for intrafascicular recording and stimulation in the sciatic nerve of a cat. Brain Res Bull 51: 293–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chapin JK (2004) Using multi-neuron population recordings for neural prosthetics. Nat Neurosci 7: 452–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carmena J, Lebedev M, Crist R, O’Doherty J, Santucci D, Dimitrov D, Patil P, Henriquez C, Nicolelis M (2003) Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. Plos Biol 1: E2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobelle W (2000) Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J 46: 3–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donoghue J (2002) Connecting cortex to machines: recent advances in brain interfaces, Nat Neurosci Suppl 5: 1085–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Donoghue J, Nurmikko A, Friehs G, Black M (2004) Development of a neuromotor prosthesis for humans. Chapter 63 in advances in clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 57: 588–602Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finn W, LoPresti P (eds) (2003) Handbook of Neuroprosthetic methods. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friehs G, Zerris V, Ojakangas C, Fellows M, Donoghue J (2004) Brain-machine and brain-computer interfaces. Stroke 35: 2702–2705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gasson M, Hutt B, Goodhew I, Kyberd P, Warwick K (2005) Invasive neural prosthesis for neural signal detection and nerve stimulation. Proc Inter J Adapt Contr Sign Proc 19: 365–375Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gasson M, Yung S, Aziz T, Stein J, Warwick K (2005) Towards a demand driven deep brain stimulator for the treatment of movement disorders. Proc. 3rd IEE International Seminar on Medical Applications of Signal Processing, pp 16/1–16/4Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grill W, Kirsch R (2000) Neuroprosthetic applications of electrical stimulation. Assis Techn 12: 6–16Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinterberger T, Veit R, Wilhelm B, Weiscopf N, Vatine J, Birbaumer N (2005) Neuronal mechanisms underlying control of a brain-computer interface. Eur J Neurosci 21: 3169–3181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy P, Bakay R, Moore M, Adams K, Goldwaith J (2000) Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 8: 198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy P, Andreasen D, Ehirim P, King B, Kirby T, Mao H, Moore M (2004) Using human extra-cortical local field potentials to control a switch. J Neur Eng 1: 72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mann S (1997) Wearable computing: a first step towards personal imaging. Computer 30: 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nicolelis M, Dimitrov D, Carmena J, Crist R, Lehew G, Kralik J, Wise S (2003) Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys. Proc Nat Acad USA 100: 11041–11046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Penny W, Roberts S, Curran E, Stokes M (2000) EEG-based communication: a pattern recognition approach. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 8: 214–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pinter M, Murg M, Alesch F, Freundl B, Helscher R, Binder H (1999) Does deep brain stimulation of the nucleus ventralis intermedius affect postural control and locomotion in Parkinson’s disease? Mov Disord 14: 958–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reger B, Fleming K, Sanguineti V, Simon Alford S, Mussa-Ivaldi F (2000) Connecting brains to robots: an artificial body for studying computational properties of neural tissues. Artif Life 6: 307–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rizzo J, Wyatt J, Humayun M, DeJuan E, Liu W, Chow A, Eckmiller R, Zrenner E, Yagi T, Abrams G (2001) Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead. Opthalmology 108, No 1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roitberg B (2005) Noninvasive brain-computer interface. Surg Neurol 63: 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warwick K (2004) I Cyborg, University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warwick K, Gasson M, Hutt B, Goodhew I, Kyberd P, Andrews B, Teddy P, Shad A (2003) The application of implant technology for cybernetic systems. Arch Neurol 60: 1369–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warwick K, Gasson M, Hutt B, Goodhew I, Kyberd P, Schulzrinne H, Wu X (2004) Thought communication and control: a first step using radiotelegraphy. IEE Proc Commun 151: 185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warwick K, Gasson M, Hutt B, Goodhew I (2005) An attempt to extend human sensory capabilities by means of implant technology. Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Hawaii, pp 1663–1668Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wolpaw J, McFarland D, Neat G, Forheris C (1990) An EEG based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78: 252–259Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xie S, Yang Z, Yang Y (2004) Brain-computer interface based on event-related potentials during imitated natural reading, Inter J Psychol Suppl 39: S138Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yoo S, Fairneny T, Chen N, Choo S, Panych L, Park H, Lee S, Jolesz F (2004) Brain-computer interface using fMRI: spatial navigation by thoughts. Neuroreport 15: 1591–1595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yu N, Chen J, Ju M (2001) Closed-loop control of quadriceps/hamstring activation for FES-induced standing-up movement of paraplegics. J Musculoskel Res 5: 173–184Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cybernetic Intelligence Research Group, Department of Cybernetics, School of Systems EngineeringUniversity of ReadingWhiteknights, Reading, BerkshireUK

Personalised recommendations