Abstract
The impact of administrative law rules on tort law in Norway is substantial. Firstly, some of the Acts of administrative law comprise rules of strict liability to ensure that the safety regulations elsewhere in the Act are followed. Such Acts are, for example, Forurensningsloven 13 March 1981 no. 6 (the Norwegian Act on Pollution, forurl.) and Tivoliloven 7 June 1991 no. 24 (the Norwegian Act on Funfairs, tivolil.). In these areas the statutory provisions regulate the question of torts and compensation. Secondly, the administrative rules will have great importance when deciding whether or not an actor has acted in a faulty manner. The administrative law rules will often describe standard procedures, especially when it comes to safety regulations. This kind of description will often be applied by the judges as a sort of guideline when they are deciding whether the alleged tortfeasor acted in a faulty manner.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
T. Eckhoff/ E. Smith, Forvaltningsrett (Public administration law) (7th ed. 2004) 448–449.
For an extensive presentation and critical elaboration of this rule, see B. Liisberg, Erstatningsansvaret for offentlig servicevirksomhet (Liability for public service activity) (2005). See also P. Lødrup, Erstatningsrett (Tort Law) (5th ed. 2005) 161–166 and N. Nygaard, Skade og ansvar (Damage and Liability) (6th ed. 2007) 239–245.
Lødrup (fn. 2) 130–135; Nygaard (fn. 2) 199–204.
Cf. Nygaard (fn. 2) 202–203.
Eckhoff/ Smith (fn. 1) 449.
H.P. Graver, Alminnelig forvaltningsrett (General public administration law) (2nd ed. 2002) 508–509.
Nygaard (fn. 2) 204–205.
Nygaard (fn. 2) 204.
Tvistemålsloven 13 August 1915 no. 5 (The Norwegian Litigation Act, tvml.) § 183.
Lødrup (fn. 2) 378; Nygaard (fn. 2) 169–171.
T. Falkanger, Tingsrett (Property law) (5th ed. 2000) 328–329; cf. Rt. 1974, 122.
Cf. Rt. 1969, 757 and B. Askeland, Uturvanderegelen i naboloven § 2 (The rule on unnecessity in Neighbour Act § 2), Jussens venner (“Friends of the law” — Norwegian periodical on law, JV) 1996, 326, 355–369.
Cf. B. Askeland, Norwegian report, in: H. Koziol/ B.C. Steininger (eds.), European Tort Law 2004 (2005) 451 ff. no. 8.
The cases are listed and elaborated in Nygaard (fn. 2) 253–283.
Cf. W.V.H. Rogers, Commentary ad Multiple Tortfeasors, in: European Group on Tort Law (ed.), Principles of European Tort Law, Text and Commentary (2005) 138 ff., 143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Askeland, B. (2007). Tort and Regulatory Law in Norway. In: van Boom, W.H., Lukas, M., Kissling, C. (eds) Tort and Regulatory Law. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 19. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-31134-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-31134-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-31133-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-31134-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)