Skip to main content

Tort and Regulatory Law in Norway

  • Chapter
Tort and Regulatory Law

Part of the book series: Tort and Insurance Law ((TIL,volume 19))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

The impact of administrative law rules on tort law in Norway is substantial. Firstly, some of the Acts of administrative law comprise rules of strict liability to ensure that the safety regulations elsewhere in the Act are followed. Such Acts are, for example, Forurensningsloven 13 March 1981 no. 6 (the Norwegian Act on Pollution, forurl.) and Tivoliloven 7 June 1991 no. 24 (the Norwegian Act on Funfairs, tivolil.). In these areas the statutory provisions regulate the question of torts and compensation. Secondly, the administrative rules will have great importance when deciding whether or not an actor has acted in a faulty manner. The administrative law rules will often describe standard procedures, especially when it comes to safety regulations. This kind of description will often be applied by the judges as a sort of guideline when they are deciding whether the alleged tortfeasor acted in a faulty manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Eckhoff/ E. Smith, Forvaltningsrett (Public administration law) (7th ed. 2004) 448–449.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an extensive presentation and critical elaboration of this rule, see B. Liisberg, Erstatningsansvaret for offentlig servicevirksomhet (Liability for public service activity) (2005). See also P. Lødrup, Erstatningsrett (Tort Law) (5th ed. 2005) 161–166 and N. Nygaard, Skade og ansvar (Damage and Liability) (6th ed. 2007) 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lødrup (fn. 2) 130–135; Nygaard (fn. 2) 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Nygaard (fn. 2) 202–203.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eckhoff/ Smith (fn. 1) 449.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.P. Graver, Alminnelig forvaltningsrett (General public administration law) (2nd ed. 2002) 508–509.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nygaard (fn. 2) 204–205.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nygaard (fn. 2) 204.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tvistemålsloven 13 August 1915 no. 5 (The Norwegian Litigation Act, tvml.) § 183.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lødrup (fn. 2) 378; Nygaard (fn. 2) 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Falkanger, Tingsrett (Property law) (5th ed. 2000) 328–329; cf. Rt. 1974, 122.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Rt. 1969, 757 and B. Askeland, Uturvanderegelen i naboloven § 2 (The rule on unnecessity in Neighbour Act § 2), Jussens venner (“Friends of the law” — Norwegian periodical on law, JV) 1996, 326, 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. B. Askeland, Norwegian report, in: H. Koziol/ B.C. Steininger (eds.), European Tort Law 2004 (2005) 451 ff. no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The cases are listed and elaborated in Nygaard (fn. 2) 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. W.V.H. Rogers, Commentary ad Multiple Tortfeasors, in: European Group on Tort Law (ed.), Principles of European Tort Law, Text and Commentary (2005) 138 ff., 143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Willem H. van Boom Meinhard Lukas Christa Kissling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Askeland, B. (2007). Tort and Regulatory Law in Norway. In: van Boom, W.H., Lukas, M., Kissling, C. (eds) Tort and Regulatory Law. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 19. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-31134-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics