Abstract
Monitoring is a compromise response to environmental debates Environmentalists are concerned with the risks associated with transgenic crops, whereas many promoters of biotechnology can see only benefits [1]. As with many such debates, the solution is a compromise, which may satisfy neither side. One key to making both parties agree to such a compromise can be an effective monitoring program. From an environmentalist’s perspective monitoring can serve to alert the public that there is indeed an ecological problem, in spite of our best hopes. From a biotechnologist’s point of view, monitoring can substantiate that no ecological problems have been forthcoming, and that thus regulations should be relaxed. Monitoring needs to be sensitive enough that it triggers an alarm before it is too late. On the other hand, monitoring must not be so unrealistically sensitive to the point that it could never yield a verdict of safety. In this paper we explore the promise and limitations of monitoring for escaped transgenic plants that are on the verge of becoming serious weed problems. More specifically, the ecological risk at which our monitoring program is aimed is simply the establishment and spread of a novel plant. Although this is a simplistic “risk”, it might well be a practical target for transgenic monitoring, since without spread and proliferation transgenes are unlikely to produce substantial impacts.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Snow AA, Palma PM (1997) Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience 47: 86–96
Anonymous (1997) EPA approves bromoxynil for transgenic cotton. The Gene Exchange Fall 1997
Metz PL, Jacobsen E, Nap JP, Pereira A, Stiekema WJ (1997) The impact on biosafety of the phosphinothricintolerance transgene in inter-specific B. rapa × B. napus hybrids and their successive backcrosses. Theor Appl Genet 95: 442–450
Stewart CN, Jr All JN, Raymer PL, Ramachandran S (1997) Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rape-seed under insect selection pressure. Molec Ecol 6: 773–779
Bigger DS, Marvier MA (1998) How different would a world without herbivory be? Integrative Biology 1: 1–8
Pysek P, Prach K, Rejmanek M, Wade M (eds) (1995) Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam
Stone CP, Smith CW, Tunison JT (eds) (1992) Alien plant invasions in native ecosystems of Hawaii: management and research. University of Hawaii, Honolulu
Regal PJ (1993) The true meaning of ‘exotic species’ as a model for genetically engineered organisms. Experientia 49: 225–234
Williamson M (1993) Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically manipulated organisms. Experientia 49: 219–224
Williams MC (1980) Purposefully introduced plants that have become noxious or poisonous weeds. Weed Sci 28: 300–305
Le Floc’h E, Le Houerou HN, Mathez J (1990) History and patterns of plant invasion in Northern Africa. In: F di Castri, AH Hansen, M Debussche (eds): Biological invasions in Europe and the mediterranean basin. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 105–133
Lonsdale WM (1994) Inviting trouble: introduced pature species in northern Australia. Aust J Ecol 19: 345–354
Gordon DR, Thomas KP (1997) Florida’s invasion by nonindigenous plants: history, screening, and regulation. In: D Simberloff, DC Schmitz, TC Brown (eds): Strangers in paradise: impact and management of non-indigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington D.C., 21–37
Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: HG Baker, CL Stebbins (eds): The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, 147–169
Newsome AE, Noble IR (1986) Ecological and physiological characters of invading species. In: RH Groves, JJ Burdon (eds): Ecology of biological invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–17
Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: F di Castri, AH Hansen, M Debussche (eds): Biological invasions in Europe and the mediterranean basin. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 335–352
Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 133–137
Pysek P, Prach K, Smilauer P (1995) Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. In: P Pysek, K Prach, M Rejmanek, M Wade (eds): Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 39–60
Scott JK, Panetta FD (1993) Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. J Biogeogr 20: 87–93
Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11: 193–203
Hengeveld R (1989) Dynamics of biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York
Moody ME, Mack RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25: 1009–1021
Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9: 761–770
Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: P Pysek, K Prach, M Rejmanek, M Wade (eds): Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 15–38
Crooks JA, Soule ME. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: OT Sandlund, PJ Schei, A Viken (eds): Norway/UN conference on alien species: proceedings. Directorate for Nature Management and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway, 39–46
Braithwaite RW, Lonsdale WM, Estbergs JA (1989) Alien vegetation and native biota in tropical Australia: the impact of Mimosa pigra. Biol Conserv 48: 189–210
Griffin GF, Stafford Smith DM, Morton SR, Allan GE, Masters KA, Preece N (1989) Status and implications of the invasion of tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla) on the Finke River, Northern Territory, Australia. J Environ Manage 29: 297–315
Forcella F, Harvey SJ (1981) New and exotic weeds of Montana. II. Migration and distribution of 100 alien weeds in northwestern USA, 1881–1980. Montana Department of Agriculture, Noxious and Exotic Weed Survey of Montana. Montana Department of Agriculture, Helena, Montana
Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC (1997) Why we should care and what we should do. In: D Simberloff, DC Schmitz, TC Brown (eds): Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington D.C., 359–367
Simberloff D (1997) Eradication. In: D Simberloff, DC Schmitz, TC Brown (eds): Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington D.C., 221–228
Crawley MJ, Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn S, Buxton J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363: 620–623
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Basel AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marvier, M.A., Meir, E., Kareiva, P.M. (1999). How do the design of monitoring and control strategies affect the chance of detecting and containing transgenic weeds?. In: Ammann, K., Jacot, Y., Kjellsson, G., Simonsen, V. (eds) Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8700-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8700-7_14
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9735-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8700-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive