Applications to adaptation algorithms

  • Lennart Ljung
Part of the DMV Seminar book series (OWS, volume 17)


To cope with a changing world is a basic concern. In many engineering systems there are requirements of adaptability. Examples include adaptive control (adjust the regulator to the current properties of the system), adaptive filtering (continuously tuning a signal processing filter to allow for optimal action at all times), adaptive prediction and so on.


Kalman Filter Little Mean Square Recursive Little Square Adaptation Algorithm Little Mean Square Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    M. Basseville and A. Benveniste. Detection of Abrupt Changes in Signals and Dynamical Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer-Verlag, 1986Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Benveniste. Design of adaptive algorithms for the tracking of time-varying systems.International Journal of Adaptive control and Signal Processing, 1:3–29, 1987zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Gustafsson. Optimal segmentation of linear regression parameters. Technical report, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Hägglund. Adaptive control of systems subject to large paremeter changes. In Proc. 9th IFAC World Congress, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Holst and N. K. Poulsen. Self tuning control of plants with abrupt changes. In Proc. 9th IFAC World Congress, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. E. Kaiman and R. S. Bucy. New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Transaction ASME, Journal of Basic Engineering, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. P. Korostelev. Multistep procedures of stochastic optimization. Avtomatikha i Telemekhanika, (5):82–90, 1981.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. Ljung. System Identification — Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, N. J., 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L. Ljung and P. Priouret. A result of the mean square error obtained using general tracking algorithms. Int. J. of Adaptive Control, 5:231–250, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. Ljung and T. Söderström. Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. MIT press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. V. Shilman and A. I. Yastrebov. Convergence of a class of multistep stochastic adaptation algorithms. Avtomatikha i Telemekhanika, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. V. Shilman and A. I. Yastrebov. Properties of a class of multistep gradient and pseudogradient algorithms of adaptation and learning. Avtomatikha i Telemekhanika, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    B. Widrow and M. E. Hoff Jr. Adaptive switching circuits. IRE WESCON Convention Record, 1960Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lennart Ljung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringLinköping University83 LinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations