Skip to main content

Commentary on the limitation of antidepressants in current use

  • Chapter
Antidepressants

Part of the book series: Milestones in Drug Therapy MDT ((MDT))

Abstract

Antidepressants in current use are generally classified by their immediate pharmacological actions [1, 2]. Thus, there are two classical pharmacological classes that include over a dozen individual drugs and the six newer pharmacological classes that include at least 10 specific agents (Tab. 1) [1, 2]. As a group, these antidepressants are important therapeutic agents with many favorable characteristics. The newer antidepressants have a better safety profile than the classical antidepressants. All antidepressants, however, are generally recognized as effective for the majority of patients with major depressive disorder, and also have an ever expanding portfolio of therapeutic actions in other disorders, such as panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and many others. Over half of patients with depression treated with any of the currently available antidepressants will respond to treatment, and over 90% will respond if several antidepressants are tried in sequence, or combinations of antidepressants and other drugs are administered [3-5]. Antidepressants also reduce relapse rates for the first 6 to 12 months after improving from an episode of major depressive disorder [6]. So what could possibly be the limitations of drugs with so many positive features?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stahl SM (2000) Essential psychopharmacology, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leonard BE (1997) Fundamentals of psychopharmacology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  3. Depression in primary care, volume 2,treatment of major depression; clinical practice guideline, number 5 (April 1993) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  4. Depression in primary care, volume 1,detection and diagnosis; clinical practice guideline, number 5, (April 1993) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thase ME, Rush AJ (1995) Treatment resistant depression. In: FE Bloom, DJ Kupfer DJ (eds): Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Perel JM et al (1992) Five year outcome for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 49: 769-773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duman RF, Heninger CR, Nestler EJ (1997) A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry Vol. 54: 597-606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stahl SM (1998) Basic Psychopharmacology of Antidepressants, part 2: estrogen as an adjunct to antidepressant treatment. JClin Psychiat 59 (suppl 4): 15-24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prien RF Robinson DS (eds) (1994) Clinical evaluation of psychotropic drugs: principles and guidelines. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robins LN, Regier DA (1991) Psychiatric disorders in America: the epidemiologic catchment area study. New York, The FreePress (Macmillan Inc.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Lavori PW et al (1992) Recovery in major depressive disorder: analysis with the life table and regression models. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39: 905-910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Lavori PW et al (1992) Relapse in major depressive disorder: analysis with the life table. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39: 911-915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keller MB, Klerman GL, Lavori PW et al (1984) Long term outcome of episodes of major depression: clinical and public health significance. JAMA 252: 788-792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Mueller TI et al (1992) Time to recovery, chronicity and levels of psychopathology in major depression: a 5 year prospective follow up of 431 subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49: 809-816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Rice J et al (1986) The persistent risk of chronicity in recurrent episodes of nonbipolar major depressive disorder: a prospective follow-up. Am J Psychiatry 143: 24-28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steffens DC, Krishnan KRR, Helms MJ (1997) Are SSRIs better than TCAs? Comparison of SSRIs and TCAs: A meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety 6: 10-18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson IM (1998) SSRIs vs. tricyclic antidepressants in depressed inpatients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. Depression and Anxiety 7: 11-17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Einarson TR, Arikian SR, Casciano J et al (1999) Comparison of extended release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Therapeutics 21: 296-308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stahl SM (1997) Are two antidepressant mechanisms better than one? J Clin Psychiatry 58 (8): 339-341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson JC, Mazure CM, Bowers MB et al (1991) A preliminary, open study of the combination of fluoxetine and desipramine for rapid treatment of major depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 48: 303-307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gelenberg AJ, Bassuk EL (1997) The practitioners guide to psychoactive drugs, 4th edition. Plenum Medical Book Company, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahl, S.M. (2001). Commentary on the limitation of antidepressants in current use. In: Leonard, B.E. (eds) Antidepressants. Milestones in Drug Therapy MDT. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8344-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8344-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9526-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8344-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics