Abstract
Antidepressants in current use are generally classified by their immediate pharmacological actions [1, 2]. Thus, there are two classical pharmacological classes that include over a dozen individual drugs and the six newer pharmacological classes that include at least 10 specific agents (Tab. 1) [1, 2]. As a group, these antidepressants are important therapeutic agents with many favorable characteristics. The newer antidepressants have a better safety profile than the classical antidepressants. All antidepressants, however, are generally recognized as effective for the majority of patients with major depressive disorder, and also have an ever expanding portfolio of therapeutic actions in other disorders, such as panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and many others. Over half of patients with depression treated with any of the currently available antidepressants will respond to treatment, and over 90% will respond if several antidepressants are tried in sequence, or combinations of antidepressants and other drugs are administered [3-5]. Antidepressants also reduce relapse rates for the first 6 to 12 months after improving from an episode of major depressive disorder [6]. So what could possibly be the limitations of drugs with so many positive features?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Stahl SM (2000) Essential psychopharmacology, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York
Leonard BE (1997) Fundamentals of psychopharmacology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester
Depression in primary care, volume 2,treatment of major depression; clinical practice guideline, number 5 (April 1993) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD
Depression in primary care, volume 1,detection and diagnosis; clinical practice guideline, number 5, (April 1993) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD
Thase ME, Rush AJ (1995) Treatment resistant depression. In: FE Bloom, DJ Kupfer DJ (eds): Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven Press, New York
Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Perel JM et al (1992) Five year outcome for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 49: 769-773
Duman RF, Heninger CR, Nestler EJ (1997) A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry Vol. 54: 597-606
Stahl SM (1998) Basic Psychopharmacology of Antidepressants, part 2: estrogen as an adjunct to antidepressant treatment. JClin Psychiat 59 (suppl 4): 15-24
Prien RF Robinson DS (eds) (1994) Clinical evaluation of psychotropic drugs: principles and guidelines. Raven Press, New York
Robins LN, Regier DA (1991) Psychiatric disorders in America: the epidemiologic catchment area study. New York, The FreePress (Macmillan Inc.)
Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Lavori PW et al (1992) Recovery in major depressive disorder: analysis with the life table and regression models. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39: 905-910
Keller MB, Shapiro RW, Lavori PW et al (1992) Relapse in major depressive disorder: analysis with the life table. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39: 911-915
Keller MB, Klerman GL, Lavori PW et al (1984) Long term outcome of episodes of major depression: clinical and public health significance. JAMA 252: 788-792
Keller MB, Lavori PW, Mueller TI et al (1992) Time to recovery, chronicity and levels of psychopathology in major depression: a 5 year prospective follow up of 431 subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49: 809-816
Keller MB, Lavori PW, Rice J et al (1986) The persistent risk of chronicity in recurrent episodes of nonbipolar major depressive disorder: a prospective follow-up. Am J Psychiatry 143: 24-28
Steffens DC, Krishnan KRR, Helms MJ (1997) Are SSRIs better than TCAs? Comparison of SSRIs and TCAs: A meta-analysis. Depression and Anxiety 6: 10-18
Anderson IM (1998) SSRIs vs. tricyclic antidepressants in depressed inpatients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability. Depression and Anxiety 7: 11-17
Einarson TR, Arikian SR, Casciano J et al (1999) Comparison of extended release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Therapeutics 21: 296-308
Stahl SM (1997) Are two antidepressant mechanisms better than one? J Clin Psychiatry 58 (8): 339-341
Nelson JC, Mazure CM, Bowers MB et al (1991) A preliminary, open study of the combination of fluoxetine and desipramine for rapid treatment of major depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 48: 303-307
Gelenberg AJ, Bassuk EL (1997) The practitioners guide to psychoactive drugs, 4th edition. Plenum Medical Book Company, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stahl, S.M. (2001). Commentary on the limitation of antidepressants in current use. In: Leonard, B.E. (eds) Antidepressants. Milestones in Drug Therapy MDT. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8344-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8344-3_3
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9526-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8344-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive