Abstract
To assess the risk to the public from lifetime exposures to very low levels of carcinogens, federal agencies routinely model dose-response relationships and estimate the exposure levels that are likely to be “virtually safe”. The data for these purposes comes from animal bioassays which use much higher dose levels than those to which humans are exposed in the environment. The big problem is how to best estimate the dose-response curve at the very low dose levels. In this paper, I introduce a new framework to the problem which takes advantage of the fact that various dose-response curves differ in their inherent risk mechanisms. Within the framework, a new justification is given to the default model used by federal agencies. A new model, which complements the default model, has a similar justification. Together, they greatly improve risk/benefit analyses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectivness of an insecticide. J., Econ. Entomol., 18:265.
Armitage, P. and Doll, R. (1961). Stochastic models for carcinogenesis. In Ney-man, J., editor, Proceeding of the Fouth Berekely Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, volume 4, pages 19-38. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA.
Cornfield, J. (1977). Carcinogenic risk assessment. Science,198:693-699.
Crump, K. S. (1996). The linearized multistage model and the future of quan-titative risk assessment. Human Experimental Toxicology, 15:787-798.
Crump, K. S., Hoel, D., Langley, C., and Peto, R. (1976). Fundamental carcino-genic processes and their implications for low-dose risk assessment. CancerResearch, 36:2973-2979.
Food Safty Council (1980). Quantitative risk assessment. Food eY Cosmetics Toxicology, 18:711-734.
Fygenson, M. (1997). A new approach in modeling categorical response. i. binarycase. Journal of the American Statistical Association,92:322-332.
Fygenson, M. (1999). Virtually safe dose: A new framework. Submitted.
Gaylor, D. W. (1979). The ED01 study: Summary and conclusions. In Staffa,J. A. and Mehlman, M. A., editors, Innovations in Cancer Risk Assessment(EDO1 Study), pages 179-186. International Toxicology Books, Kingston, NJ.
Gaylor, D. W. and Kodell, R. L. (1980). Linear interpolation algorithm for low-dose risk assessment of toxic substances. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 4:305-312.
Graham, S. L., David, K. S., Hansen, W. H., and Charles, R. (1975). Effects of prolonged ethylene thiourea ingestion on the thyroid of rates. Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 13:493-499.
Hoel, D. G. et al (1975). Estimation of risk in irreversible, delayed toxicity. Journal Toxicol. Environ. Health, 1:133-151.
Krewski, D. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981). Dose-response models for quantal response toxicity data. In Statistics and Related Topics, pages 201-230. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Mantel, N. and Bryan, W. (1961). Safety testing of carcinogenic agents. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 27:455-470.
National Academy of Sciences (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government:Managing the process. Technical report, NAC, Washington, DC.Rai, K. and Van Ryzin, J. (1981). A generalized multi-hit dose response modelfor low dose extrapolation. Biometrics, 37:321-326.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996). Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Technical report, Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/P-92003C, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (1987). Sponsored compounds in food-producing animals: criteria and procedures.
Van Ryzin, J. (1980). Quantitative risk assessment. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 22:321-326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Basel AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fygenson, M. (2001). Risk Assessment of Low Dose Exposure to Carcinogens. In: Fernholz, L.T., Morgenthaler, S., Stahel, W. (eds) Statistics in Genetics and in the Environmental Sciences. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8326-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8326-9_5
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9518-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8326-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive