Skip to main content

The conservation of genetic diversity: gene flow from agriculture

  • Conference paper
  • 197 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most frequently raised concerns about the introduction of genetically modified crops is that transgenes may be transferred to wild relatives, resulting either in the disruption of natural patterns of genetic diversity by “pollution” of species gene pools or in the addition of traits which may cause wild plants to become weedy or invasive. This paper examines these ideas from the viewpoint of conservation genetics. We look first at what is known about genetic diversity in natural populations and the forces that shape it, and then consider some of the issues which arise from hybridisations between crops and their wild relatives. The problems of predicting which traits may confer weediness and the importance of taking a case-by-case approach are illustrated by some of our work on virus-resistance in wild Brassica species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Al Mazyad PR, Ammann K (1999) Biogeographical assay and natural gene flow, In: Ammann K. Jacot Y. Simonsen V, Kjellson G (eds.) Methods for risk assessment of transgenic plants. 111. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, 95–98. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosoli M (1997) The wild and the sown. Botany and agriculture. 1350–1850. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1965) Characters and modes of origin of weeds. in: Baker FIG, Stebbins GL (eds.) The genetics of colonising species, 147–172. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw AD, McNeilley T (eds.) (1981) Evolution and Pollution. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden II (1987) Phenotypic and genetic patterns of resistance to the pathogen Phakapsora pachvrhi i in populations of Glycine canescens. Deco/ogia 73: 257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM (1940) Experimental studies on the nature of species. i. The effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publications No 520. Washington DC, 1–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels RE, Sheail, J (1999) Genetic pollution: concepts, concerns and transgenic crops. 1n: Littman PJW (ed.) Gene flow and agriculture, relevance for transgenic crops. BCPC Symposium Na 72, 65–72, British Crop Protection Council, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries FT, van der Meijden R, Brandenburg WA (1992) Botanical files. A study of real chances for spontaneous gene flow from cultivated plants to the wild flora of The Netherlands. Garteria supplement, Rijksherbarium Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock IF (1999) Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 30: 539–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581 – 598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AI (1996) Genetic diversity and its conservation in natural populations of plants. Brodiversiry Letters 3: 71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray Al (1996a) Genecology, the genetic system and the conservation genetics of uncommon British grasses. In: Crawford Ti, Spencer J, Stevens D, Tew TE, Usher MB, Warren J (eds.) The role of genetics in conserving small populations. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor W (1996) Ecotypic differentiation. New Phytologist 45: 254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacot Y, Ammann K (1999) Gene flow between selected Swiss crops and related weeds: risk assessment for the field releases of GMOs in Switzerland. In: Ammann K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellson G (eds.) Methods for risk assessment of Transgenic plants. III. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, 99–108. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Kik C (1989) Ecological genetics of salt resistance in the clonal perennial Agrostis stolonifcra. New Phytologist 133: 453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling J (1996) Could transgenic crops one day breed superweeds? Science 274: 180–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell LC, Raybould AF, Cooper il, Edwards M-L, Gray AJ (1999) Effects of turnip mosaic virus and turnip yellow mosaic virus on the survival, growth and reproduction of wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Annals of Applied Biology l35: 401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney KK, Fowler NL (1991) Genetic adaptations to grazing and mowing in the unpalatable grass Cenchrus incertus. Oecologia 88: 238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powles SB, Ftoltum JAM (eds.) (1994) Herbicide resistance in plants. Lewis Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Gray Ai (1993) Genetically modified crops and hybridisation with wild relatives: a UK perspective. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Mayes CL, Maskell LC, Mogg RJ, Warman EA, Wardlaw IC, Elmes GW, Edwards M-L, Cooper il, Clarke RT, Gray Ai (1999) Predicting the ecological impacts of transgenes for insect-and virus-resistance in natural and feral populations of Brassica species. In: Amman K, Jacot Y, Simonsen V, Kjellson G (eds.): Methods for risk assessment of transgenic plants. III. Ecological risks and prospects of transgenic plants, 3–15. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould AF, Maskell LC, Edwards M-I., Cooper il, Gray AI (1999a) The prevalence and spatial distribution of virus infections in natural populations of Brassica oleracea. New Phytologist 141: 265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renno JF, Winkel T, Bonnefous G, Bezançon G (1997) Experimental study of gene flow between wild and cultivated Pennisetum glaucum. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 925–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turesson G (1922) The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3: 211–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JM, Raybould AF, Ball T, Gray Ai, Hayward MD (1998) Genetic structure in the perennial grasses Lolium perenne and Agrostis curtisii. Heredity 81: 556–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Basel AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gray, A. et al. (2003). The conservation of genetic diversity: gene flow from agriculture. In: Ammann, K., Jacot, Y., Braun, R. (eds) Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8033-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8033-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9413-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8033-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics