Skip to main content

The Development of Systems Science: Concepts of Knowledge as Seen from Western and Eastern Perpsective

  • Chapter
Technological Concepts and Mathematical Models in the Evolution of Modern Engineering Systems
  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents first a historical review of the role of technological concepts and mathematical methods in the development of systems science, recalling the origins of systems analysis and the role of the hard and soft approaches to systems science. This dialectic contradiction is typical for Western science, but also helped to achieve many synthetic approaches and results, particularly proposed of researchers from either Eastern and Central Europe, or from Far East countries. In further sections, the chapter concentrates on the concepts of knowledge and of models on the verge of information society and knowledge-based economy. Knowledge-based economy and information society are defined similarly by knowledge and information becoming an essential or even dominant productive factor. In order to reflect on their impacts, it is essential to understand better the distinction between information and knowledge. Various types of understanding of the concept of knowledge are discussed in this chapter. One type characteristic of hard sciences in information age is related to synthesizing information into mathematical models that can be analyzed by using computers. Data mining in very large data sets is also related to finding patterns or models that synthesize characteristics of data relevant for a given purpose. Most of methodological conclusions related to mathematical modeling and data mining is not restricted to computer science, but have interdisciplinary character and support interdisciplinary research. Knowledge and information become either more commercialized in knowledge-based economy - or, if supported by public funding, more accessible for public use. Thus, it becomes also more important to make knowledge more accessible in the form of mathematical models used by various scientific disciplines. Easy exchange of computerized mathematical models will help in a better verification and validation of research results for knowledge-based economy and information society. However, in order to increase such accessibility, better standards and software tools for analysis of mathematical models should be developed. As an example, this chapter presents the need of such standards in a part of modern systems science - in multi-objective model-based decision support. A survey of reference point methodology and of its applications for model-based decision support systems in engineering and environmental control is included. Conclusions of the chapter relate to the concepts of knowledge and of models from mathematical, technological and humanistic perspectives and to the Western and Eastern traditions of understanding these concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, J. H., 1973, Origins and Growth of Sociology, London, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, L. R., 1979, “The future of operations research is past”, Journal of the Operations Research Society, 30: 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine, J., Fischer, G., and Makowski, M., 1977, “Multiple criteria land use analysis”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 83: 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriole, S. J., 1989, Handbook of Decision Support Systems, Blue Ridge Summit (Pa.), TAB Professional and Reference Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L., 1968, General Systems Theory: Foundations,Development, Applications, New York, Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisschop J. and Entriken, R., 1993, AIMMS, The Modeling System. Haarlem, Paragon Decision Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A., 1988, GAMS, A User’s Guide, Redwood City, The Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chames, A. and Cooper, W. W., 1977, “Goal programming and multiple objective optimization”, Journal of the Operations Research Society, 1: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., 1981, Systems Thinking,Systems Practice, Chichester, J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G., 1959Theory of Value,New York, J. Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S., 1986, Mind Over Machine: The Role of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of Computers, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P., 1987, Farewell to Reason, New York, Verso Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findeisen, W. (ed.), 1985, Systems Analysis: Foundations and Methodology (in Polish), Warsaw, PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourer R., Gay, D. M., and Kernighan, B. W., 1993, AMPL. A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming, San Francisco, The Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A., 1989, “The formal aspects of structured modeling”, Operations Research, 37 (1): 30–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Granat J. and Makowski, M., 1988, ISAAP - Interactive Specification and Analysis of Aspiration-based Preferences, Interim Report IR-98–52, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granat, J. and Wierzbicki, A. P., 1996, “Interactive Specification of DSS User Preferences in Terms of Fuzzy Sets”, Archives of Control Sciences, 5: 185–201.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Granat, J., Krçglewski, T., and PaczyrĂ­ski, J., and A. Stachurski, 1994, IAC-DIDAS-N++ Modular Modeling and Optimization System. Part I: Theoretical Foundations,Part II: Users Guide, Internal Report, Warsaw, Institute of Automatic Control, Warsaw University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauer, M., Thompson, M., and Wierzbicki, A. P. (eds.), 1985, Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., 2000, Systems Approaches to Management, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, R., 1992, Multi-objective Decision Support for Environmental Management, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, M., Lewandowski, A., and Orchard-Hays, W., 1980, An Implementation of the Reference Point Approach for Multi-Objective Optimization, Working Paper WP-80–35, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. and Laakso, J., 1985, “A Visual Interactive Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, 24: 277–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krçglewski, T., PaczyrĂ­ski, J., Granat, J., and Wierzbicki, A. P., 1988, IAC-DIDAS-N: A Dynamic Interactive Decision Support System for Multicriteria Analysis of Nonlinear Models with a Nonlinear Model Generator Supporting Model Analysis, Working Paper WP-88–112, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S., 1981, “A function of thought experiments”, in: Scientific Revolutions (Hacking, I., ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press (originally published in L’aventure de la science, MĂ©langes Alexandre KoyrĂ©, vol. 2, Paris, Hermann, 1964: 307–334).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, A. and Wierzbicki, A. P. (eds.), 1989, Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems, Berlin, Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentz, K., 1965, Evolution and Modification of Behavior: A Critical Examination of the Concepts of the “Learned” and the “Innate” Elements of Behavior, Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, M., 1994, LP-DIT, Data Interchange Tool for Linear Programming Problems, version 1.20, Working Paper WP-94–36, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makowski, M., SomlyĂłdy, L., and Watkins, D., 1996, “Multiple criteria analysis for water quality management in the Nitra basin”, Water Resources Bulletin, 32: 937–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhashi, K., 1997, Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis to Urban Land-Use Planning, Interim Report IR-97–091, Laxenburg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, H. and Sawaragi, Y., 1983, “Satisficing trade-off method for multi-objective programming”, in: Interactive Decision Analysis (Grauer, M. and Wierzbicki, A. P. eds.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern, 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton. Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ogryczak, W., Studzinski, K., and Zorychta, K., 1989, “A generalized reference point approach to multi-objective transshipment problem with facility location”, in: Lewandowski and Wierzbicki 1989: 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osyczka, A., 1994, “C Version of Computer Aided Multicriterion Optimization System (CAMOS)”, in: Workshop on Advances in Methodology and Software in DSS, Laxen-burg, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., 1991, Rough Sets: Some Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Dordrecht Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., 1983, Realism and the Aim of Science, London, Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H., and Tanino, T., 1995, Theory of Multi-objective Optimization, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawaragi, Y. and Nakamori, Y., 1992, “Shinayakana systems approach in modeling and decision support”, in: Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, vol. I, Taipei: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, F., Sakawa, M., 1988, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning, Dordrecht, Reidel.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shimemura, E., 1999, JAIST - Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Hokuriku 1990. School of Knowledge Science, Faculty Profiles, Ishikawa, JAIST, Asahidai, Tatsunokuchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., 1957, Models of Man, New York, Macmillan.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • mierzchalski, R. and Lisowski, J., 1994, Computer simulation of safe and optimal trajectory avoiding collision at sea, Joint Communication, WSM Gdynia and Hochschule Bremerhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E. and Choo, E.V., 1983, “An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming”, Mathematical Programming, 26: 326–344.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E., 1986, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory,Computation, and Application, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A., 1980, The Third Wave, New York, W. Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1980, “The use of reference objectives in multi-objective optimization”, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Making; Theory and Applications (Fandel, G. and Gal, T., eds.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 468–486.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1983, “A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making”, Mathematical Modeling, 3: 391–405.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1984, Models and Sensitivity of Control Systems, Amsterdam, ElsevierWNT.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1986, “On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems”, OR-Spektrum, 8: 73–87.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1988, “Dynamic Aspects of Multi-Objective Optimization”, in: Multi-objective Problems of Mathematical Programming (Lewandowski, A. and Volkovich, V., eds.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 154–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1996, “On the Role of Intuition in Decision Making and Some Ways of Multicriteria Aid of Intuition”, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 6: 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1997, “Convergence of Interactive Procedures of Multi-objective Optimization and Decision Support”, in: Essays in Decision Making (Karwan, M.H., Spronk, J., and Wallenius, J., eds.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 19–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 1999, “Megatrends of Information Civilisation”, in: International Conference on Research for Information Society, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., 2000, “A Rational Theory of Intuition in Decision Making and its Relation to Negotiation Techniques”, Conference on Group Decisions and Negotiation, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., Makowski, M., and Wessels, J., 2000, Model-Based Decision Support Methods with Environmental Applications, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. P., Wydro, K. B., and Zielinski, A., 1997, “The era of information civilisation and the developmental role of telecommunications” (in Polish), Przeglgd Telekomunikacyjny i Wiadomosci Telekomunikacyjne (Warsaw), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F. M., 1984, “Evolutionary epistemology - a challenge to science and philosophy”, in: Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology (Wuketits, F. M., ed.), Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L., 1995, Habitual Domains: Freeing Yourself from the Limits on Your Life, Kansas City, Highwater Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A., 1978, “Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1: 3–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M., 1974, “A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal”, Computational Operations Research, 1: 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J., 1987, Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J. and Sebastian, H.-J., 1994, “Fuzzy design - integration of fuzzy theory with knowledge-based system design”, in: Fuzzy-IEEE 94 Proceedings, Orlando, Pergamon Press: 352–357.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wierzbicki, A.P. (2004). The Development of Systems Science: Concepts of Knowledge as Seen from Western and Eastern Perpsective. In: Gasca, A.M., Lucertini, M., Nicolò, F. (eds) Technological Concepts and Mathematical Models in the Evolution of Modern Engineering Systems. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7951-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7951-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9633-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7951-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics