Skip to main content

Which Dynamic Rupture Parameters Can Be Estimated from Strong Ground Motion and Geodetic Data?

  • Chapter
Computational Earthquake Science Part II

Part of the book series: PAGEOPH Topical Volumes ((PTV))

  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

We have tested to which extent commonly used dynamic rupture parameters can be resolved for a realistic earthquake scenario from all available observations. For this purpose we have generated three dynamic models of the Landers earthquake using a single, vertical, planar fault with heterogeneity in either the initial stress, the yield stress, or the slip-weakening distance. Although the dynamic parameters for these models are inherently different, all the simulations are in agreement with strong motion, GPS, InSAR, and field data for the event. The rupture propagation and slip distributions obtained for each model are similar, showing that the solution of the dynamic problem is non-unique. In other words, it is not always possible to separate strength drop and the slip-weakening distance using rupture modeling, in agreement with the conclusions by GUATTERI and SPUDICH (2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beroza, G. C. and Mikumo, T. (1996), Short Slip Duration in Dynamic Rupture in the Presence of Heterogeneous Fault Properties, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22,449–22,460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. and Aki, K. (1977), A Numerical Study of Two-dimensional Spontaneous Rupture Propagation, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 50, 643–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, E. M., Favreau, P., and Carlson, J. M. (2003), A Supershear Transition Mechanism for Cracks, Science 299, 1557–1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guatteri, M. and Spudich, P. (2000), What Can Strong-motion Data Tell Us about Slip-weakening Fault-friction Laws?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauksson, E. (1994), State of Stress from Focal Mechanisms Before and After the 1992 Landers Earthquake Sequence, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 917–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, B., Cotton, F., and Campillo, M. (1999), Contribution of Radar Interferometry to a Two-step Inversion of the Kinematic Process of the 1992 Landers Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 13,083–13,099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudnut, K. W., Bock, Y., Cline, M., Fang, P., Feng, Y., Freymueller, J., GE, X., Gross, W. K., Jackson, D., Kim, M., King, N. E., Langbein, J., Larsen, S. C., Lisowski, M., Shen, Z. K., Svarc, J., and Zhang, J. (1994), Co-seismic Displacements of the 1992 Landers Earthquake Sequence, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 625–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ida, Y. (1972), Cohesive Force Across the Tip of a Longitudinal-shear Crack and Griffith’s Specific Surface Energy, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 3796–3805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ide, S. and Takeo, M. (1997), Determination of Constitutive Relations of Fault Slip Based on Seismic Wave Analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 27,379–27,391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori, H. and Stewart, G. S. (1978), Seismological Aspects of the Guatemala Earthquake of February 4, 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 3427–3434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, R. (1979), On the Relation Between Seismic Moment and Stress Drop in the Presence of Stress and Strengh Heterogeneity, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2243–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, R., Olsen, K., and Archuleta, R. (1998), Modeling Dynamic Rupture in a 3-D Earthquake Fault Model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 1182–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, R. and Olsen, K. B. (2000), Criticality of Rupture Dynamics in 3-D, Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 1981–2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massonnet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C., Adragna, F., Peltzer, G., Feigl, K., and Rabaute T. (1993), The Displacement Field of the Landers Earthquake Mapped by Radar Interferometry, Nature 364, 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. H., Savage, J. C., Lisowski, M., and Gross, W. K. (1993), Coseismic Displacements: 1992 Landers, California, Earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, Y. (1985), Surface Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Half-space, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 1135–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. B., Madariaga, R., and Archuleta, R. J. (1997), Three-dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake,Science 278, 834–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrat, S., Madariaga, R., and Olsen, K. (2002), La Dynamique des Tremblements de Terre Vue à Travers le Séisme de Landers du 28 Juin 1992, C. R. Acad. Sci., Mécanique 330, 235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyrat, S., Olsen, K., and Madariaga, R. (2001), Dynamic Modeling of the 1992 Landers Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 26,467–26,482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieh, K., Jones, L., Hauksson, E., Hudnut, K., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Heaton, T., Hough, S., Hutton, K., Kanamori, H., Lilje, A., Lindvall, S., Mcgill, S. F., Mori, J., Rubin, C., Spotila, J. A., Stock, J., Thio, H. K., Treiman, J., Wernicke, B., and Zachariasen J. (1993), Near-field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992, Science 260, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, D. J. and Heaton, T. H. (1994), Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Slip for the 1992 Landers, California, Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 668–691.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peyrat, S., Olsen, K.B., Madariaga, R. (2004). Which Dynamic Rupture Parameters Can Be Estimated from Strong Ground Motion and Geodetic Data?. In: Donnellan, A., Mora, P., Matsu’ura, M., Yin, Xc. (eds) Computational Earthquake Science Part II. PAGEOPH Topical Volumes. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7875-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7875-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-7143-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7875-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics