Summary
Confounding is a basic problem of comparability — and therefore has always been present in science. Originally a plain English word, it acquired more specific meanings in epidemiologic thinking about experimental and non-experimental research. The use of the word can be traced to Fisher. The concept was developed more fully in social science research, among others by Kish. Landmark developments in epidemiology in the second half of the 20th century were by Cornfield and by Miettinen. These developments emphasised that reasoning about confounding is almost entirely an a priori process that we have to impose upon the data and the data-analysis to arrive at a meaningful interpretation. The problems of confounding present their old challenges again in recent applications to genetic epidemiology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2004). The history of confounding. In: Morabia, A. (eds) A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7603-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7603-2_17
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-6818-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-7603-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive