Advertisement

Plasticity in Life History Traits of the Freshwater Pearl Mussel — Consequences for the Danger of Extinction and for Conservation Measures

  • G. Bauer
Part of the Advances in Life Sciences book series (ALS)

Abstract

In Central Europe, the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) is threatened with extinction. It is shown how the danger of extinction is influenced by the plasticity of life history traits. The pearl mussel’s life history strategy has been selected for a high lifetime fertility, which is attained by combining high life expectancy (= high number of reproductive periods) and high fertility. However, these two traits exhibit a considerable plasticity, which depends on the individual growth constant (i.e. the rate at which the asymptotic size is approached). The growth constant is influenced by a number of environmental factors: for example it increases with increasing temperature. An increased growth constant (= accelerated growth) leads to a reduction of life span, maximum size and fertility. These relationships reduce the lifetime fertility of individuals growing at a high rate. Populations consisting of such individuals should exhibit a high sensitivity to threats for two reasons: the growth rate of the population is low and the time until extinction is shortened due to the low individual life span. This hypothesis is confirmed by the population trend in different areas of the FRG. The results are discussed with respect to conservation strategies.

Keywords

Life History Strategy Reproductive Period Growth Constant Pearl Mussel High Life Expectancy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BACHELET G. (1980): Growth and recruitment of the Tellinid Bivalve Macoma balticaat the southern limit of its geographical distribution. Mar. Biol. 59: 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BAUER G. (1983): Age structure, age specific mortality rates and population trend of the freshwater pearl mussel. Arch. Hydrobiol. 98: 523–532Google Scholar
  3. BAUER G. (1987a): The parasitic stage of the freshwater pearl mussel, III. Host relationships. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 76: 413–423Google Scholar
  4. BAUER G. (1987b): Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearl mussel. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 691–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BAUER G. (1988): Threats to the freshwater pearl mussel in Central Europe. Biol. Cons. 45: 239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BAUER G. (1989): Die bionomische Strategie der Flußperlmuschel. BIUZ 19, 3: 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BAUER G., EICKE L. (1986): Pilotprojekt zur Rettung der Flußperlmuschel. Natur u. Landschaft 4: 140–143Google Scholar
  8. BERVEN K.A., GIL. D. E. (1983): Interpreting geographic variation in life-History traits. Am. Zool. 23: 85–97Google Scholar
  9. BEVERTON R.J.H., HOLT S.J. (1959): A review of the lifespans and mortality rates of fish in nature, and their relation to growth and other physiological characteristics. CIBA Foundation Colloquia on Ageing 5: 142–180Google Scholar
  10. BURGMANN M.A., AKCAKAYA H.R., LOE. S. S. (1988): The use of extinction models for species conservation. Biol. Cons. 43: 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. COMFORT A. (1957): The duration of life in molluscs. Proc. Malac. Soc. Lond. 32: 219–241Google Scholar
  12. GILBERT M.A. (1973): Growth rate, longevity and maximum size of Macoma baltica. Biol. Bull. 145: 119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GREENSLADE P.J.M. (1983): Adversity selection and the habitat templet. Am. Nat. 122: 352–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GRUNDELIUS E.(1987): Flodpärlmusslans tillbakagang i Dalarna. Information fran sötvattans — laboratoriet Drottningholm 4Google Scholar
  15. HENDELBERG J. (1961): The freshwater pearl mussel. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 41: 149–171Google Scholar
  16. HEUSS K. (1962): Die Flußperlmuschel. Natur und Museum 92: 372–376Google Scholar
  17. HUTCHINSON G.E. (1979): An introduction to population Ecology. Yale University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. ISRAEL W. (1913): Biologie der europäischen Süßwassermuscheln. KG Lutz Verlag. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  19. JUNGBLUT. H. J. (1986): in BISCHOFF W.D., DETT.E. R, WäCHTLER K. (1986) Die Flußperlmuschel. Naturhist. Mus., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  20. RAY C. (1960): The application of Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules to the Poikilotherms. J. Morph. 106: 85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SCHAFFE. M. L. (1981): Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bio. Science 31: 131–4Google Scholar
  22. SCHAFFE. W. M. (1974): Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am. Nat. 108: 783–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SEIDLER A. (1922): Die Verbreitung der echten Flußperlmuschel im fränkischen und hessischen Buntsandsteingebiet. Ber. wett. Ges. Naturk.: 83–125Google Scholar
  24. SMITH.GILL.S. J. (1983): Developmental plasticity: Developmental conversion versus phenotypic modulation. Am. Zool. 23: 47–55Google Scholar
  25. SOLOMON M.E. (1968): Logarithmic regression as a measure of population density response. Ecology 49: 357–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SOUTHWOOD T.R.E., MAY R.M., HASSEL M.R., CONWA. G. R. (1974): EcologicaI strategies and population parameters. Am. Nat. 108: 791–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. STEARN. S. C. (1976): Life history tactics: a review of the ideas. An. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8: 145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. WALFORD L.A. (1946): A new graphical method for describing the growth of animals. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab. Woods Hole 90: 141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. WELLS S.P., PYLE R., COLLINS N. (1983): The IUCN Red Data Book. Gresham Press, Old WokingGoogle Scholar
  30. YOUNG M., WILLIAMS J. (1984): The reproductive biology of the freshwater pearl mussel in Scotland I. Field studies. Arch. Hydrobiol. 99, 4: 405–422Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Bauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology IUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations