Summary
The mechanism and function of kin recognition were examined within the framework of the social systems of vole species. Association is a proximate mechanism that underlies kin recognition for vole species that have been examined. Yet association during preweaning may not be adequate for all species at certain times of year. Some vole species form communal groups during the breeding season, whereas other species nest communally during the nonbreeding season. Moreover, individuals of some species of voles nest together at high densities, whereas individuals of other species disperse at high densities. Familiarity based on association is the cue that voles use to discriminate between close relatives and unrelated individuals. Voles do not recognize unfamiliar close relatives. Consequently, the ability to recognize kin may be limited to individuals that are philopatric or have repeated contacts with close relatives. Therefore, the ability to recognize kin may be dependent on the mating system, social organization, and habitat of a particular species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
Alexander, R. D. 1979. Darwinism and human affairs. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 317 pp.
Batzli, G. O., L. L. Getz, and S. S. Hurley. 1977. Suppression of growth and reproduction of microtine rodents by social factors. Journal of Mammalogy, 58:583–591.
Bekoff, M. 1981a. Mammalian sibling interactions: genes, facilitative environments, and the coefficient of familiarity. Pp. 307–346, in Parental care in mammals (D. J. Gubernick and P. H. Klopfer, eds.). Plenum Press, New York, 459 pp.
Bekoff, M. 1981b. Vole population cycles: kin selection or familiarity? Oecologia (Berlin), 45:1–2.
Blaustein, A. R., M. Bekoff, and T. J. Daniels. 1987a. Kin recognition in vertebrates (excluding primates): empirical evidence. Pp. 287–332, in Kin recognition in animals (D. J. C. Fletcher and C. D. Michener, eds.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 465 pp.
Blaustein, A. R., 1987b. Kin recognition in vertebrates (excluding primates): mechanisms, functions, and future research. Pp. 333–358, in Kin recognition in animals (D. J. C. Fletcher and C. D. Michener, eds.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England, 465 pp.
Boonstra, R., and I. Hogg. 1988. Friends and strangers: a test of the Charnov and Finerty hypothesis. Oecologia (Berlin), 77:95–100.
Boonstra, R., C. J. Krebs, M. S. Gaines, M. L. Johnson, and I. T. M. Craine. 1987. Natal philopatry and breeding systems in voles (Microtus spp.). Journal of Animal Ecology, 56:655–673.
Boyce, C. C. K., and J. L. Boyce III. 1988. Population biology of Microtus arvalis. I. Lifetime reproductive success of solitary and grouped breeding females. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57:711–722.
Boyd, S. K, and A R. Blaustein. 1985. Familiarity and inbreeding avoidance in the grey-tailed vole. Journal of Mammalogy, 66:348–352.
Brown, R. E. 1985a. The rodents I: effects of odours on reproductive physiology (primer effects). Pp. 245–344, in Social odours in mammals (R. E. Brown and D. W. MacDonald, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1:1–506.
Brown, R. E. 1985b. The rodents II: suborder Myomorpha. Pp. 345–457, in Social odours in mammals (R. E. Brown and D. W. MacDonald, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1:1–506.
Carter, C. S., D. M. Witt, G. Thompson, and K Carlstead. 1988. Effects of hormonal, sexual, and social history on mating and pair bonding in prairie voles. Physiology and Behavior, 44:691–697.
Charnov, E. L. 1981. Vole population cycles: ultimate or proximate explanation? Oecologia (Berlin), 48:132.
Charnov, E. L., and J. P. Finerty. 1980. Vole population cycles. A case for kin-selection? Oecologia (Berlin), 45:1–2.
Cockburn, A 1988. Social behaviour in fluctuating populations. Croom Helm, London, 239 pp.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice. Biology of Behavior, 7:157–169.
Dewsbury, D. A. 1988. Kin discrimination and reproductive behavior in muroid rodents. Behavior Genetics, 18:525–536.
Ferkin, M. H. 1988a. Seasonal differences in social behavior among adult and juvenile meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ethology, 79:116–125.
Ferkin, M. H. 1988b. The effect of familiarity on social interactions in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: a laboratory and field study. Animal Behaviour, 36:1816–1822.
Ferkin, M. H. 1989. Adult-weanling recognition among captive meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Behaviour, 118:114–124.
Ferkin, M. H. 1990. Odor selections of island beach voles during the nonbreeding season. Journal of Mammalogy, 71:397–401.
Ferkin, M. H., and T. F. Rutka. 1990. Sibling recognition in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68:609–613.
Ferkin, M. H., and J. O. Seamon. 1987. Odor preferences and social behavior in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus: seasonal differences. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65:2931–2937.
Fitz-Gerald, R. W., and D. M. Madison. 1983. Social organization of a free-ranging population of pine voles, Microtus pinetorum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13:183–187.
Gavish, L., J. E. Hofmann, and L. L. Getz. 1984. Sibling recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 32:362–366.
Getz, L. L. 1985. Habitats. Pp. 286–289, in Biology of New World Microtus (R. H. Tamarin, ed.). Special Publication, American Society of Mammalogists, 8:1–893.
Getz, L. L., and S. C. Carter. 1980. Social organization in Microtus ochrogaster populations. The Biologist, 62:56–69.
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7:1–52.
Heske, E. J., R. S. Ostfeld, and W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. 1988. Does social behavior drive vole cycles? An evaluation of competing models as they pertain to California voles. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66:1153–1159.
Hepper, P. G. 1986. Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms a review. Biological Reviews, 61:63–93.
Holmes, W. G. 1988. Kinship and the development of social preferences. Pp. 389–414, in Handbook of developmental psychology and behavioral neurobiology (E. M. Blass, ed.). Plenum Press, New York, 9:1–476.
Holmes, W. G., and P. W. Sherman. 1982. The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. American Zoologist, 22:491–517.
Holmes, W. G., 1983. Kin recognition in animals. American Scientist, 71:46–55.
Ims, R. A. 1989. Kinship and origins: effects on dispersal and space sharing in Clethrionomys rufocanus. Ecology, 70:607–616.
Jannett, F. J., Jr. 1978. The density dependent formation of extended maternal families of the montane vole, Microtus montanus nanus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 3:245–263.
Karlsson, A. F. 1986. Effect of conspecifics on winter movements and dispersion in an overwintering bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) population. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64:593–598.
Kawata, M. 1987a. The effect of kinship on spacing among female red-backed voles, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae. Oecologia (Berlin), 72:115–122.
Kawata, M. 1987b. Pregnancy failure and suppression by female-female interaction in enclosed populations of the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20:89–97.
Kawata, M. 1990. Fluctuating populations and kin interaction in mammals. Trends in Evolutionary Ecology, 5:17–20.
Krebs, C. J. 1985. Do changes in spacing behavior drive population cycles in small mammals? Pp. 295–312, in Behavioral ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour (R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith, eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 420 pp.
Lepri, J. J., and J. G. Vandenbergh. 1986. Puberty in pine voles, Microtus pinetorum, and the influence of chemosignals on female reproduction. Biology of Reproduction, 34:370–377.
Lepri, J. J., and C. J. Wysocki. 1987. Removal of the vomeronasal organ disrupts the activation of reproduction in female voles. Physiology and Behavior, 40:349–355.
Lidicker, W. Z., Jr. 1985. Population structuring as a factor in understanding microtine cycles. Acta Zoologica Fennica, 173:23–27.
Madison, D. M. 1980. An integrated view of the social behavior of Microtus pennsylvanicus. The Biologist, 69:20–33.
Madison, D. M., and W. J. McShea. 1987. Seasonal changes in reproductive tolerance, spacing, and social organization in meadow voles: a microtine model. American Zoologist, 27:899–908.
Madison, D. M., R. W. Fitz-Gerald, and W. J. McShea. 1984. Dynamics of social nesting in overwintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): possible consequences for population cycling. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15:9–17.
McDonald, D. L., and L. G. Forslund. 1978. The development of social preferences in the voles Microtus montanus and M. canicaudus. Effects of cross-fostering. Behavioral Biology, 22:497–508.
McGuire, B., and M. A. Novak. 1984. A comparison of maternal behaviour in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), prairie vole (M. ochrogaster), and pine vole (M. pinetorum). Animal Behaviour, 32:1132–1141.
McGuire, B., 1987. Effects of cross-fostering on the development of social preferences in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Behavior and Neural Biology, 47:167–172.
McGuire, M. R., and L. L. Getz. 1981. Incest taboo between sibling Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy, 62:213–215.
McShea, W. J. 1990. Social tolerance and proximate mechanisms of dispersal among winter groups of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour, 39:346–351.
McShea, W. J., and D. M. Madison. 1984. Communal nesting by reproductively active females in a spring population of Microtus pennsylvanicus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62:344–346.
Newman, K. S., and Z. T. Halpin. 1988. Individual odours and mate recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 36:1779–1787.
Oliveras, D., and M. A Novak. 1986. A comparison of paternal behaviour in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus, the pine vole, M. pinetorum, and the prairie vole, M. ochrogaster. Animal Behaviour, 34:519–526.
Ostfeld, R. S. 1986. Territoriality and mating system of California voles. Journal of Animal Ecology, 55:691–706.
Porter, R. H. 1987. Kin recognition: functions and mediating mechanisms. Pp. 175–203, in Sociobiology and psychology: ideas, issues and applications (C. Crawford, M. Smith, and D. Krebs, eds.). Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 429 pp.
Porter, R. H. 1988. The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behavior Genetics, 18:483–494.
Pugh, S. R. 1989. Relatedness, inbreeding and reproductive success in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University, Boston, 108 pp.
Pugh, S. R., and R. H. Tamarin. 1988. Inbreeding in a population of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66:1831–1834.
Rowsemitt, C. N., C. J. Walsh, M. C. Kuehl, R. E. Moore, and L. L. Jackson. 1988. Hormonal regulation of preputial gland function in male Microtus montanus, the montane vole. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 90A: 195–200.
Schadler, M. H. 1983. Male siblings inhibit reproductive activity in female pine voles, Microtus pinetorum. Biology of Reproduction, 28:1137–1139.
Shapiro, L. E., D. Austin, S. E. Ward, and D. A. Dewsbury. 1986. Familiarity and female choice in two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Animal Behaviour, 34:90–97.
Smale, L. 1988. Influence of male gonadal hormones and familiarity on pregnancy interruption in prairie voles. Biology and Reproduction, 39:28–31.
Smale, L., J. M. Pedersen, M. L. Block, and I. Zucker. 1990. Investigation of conspecific male odours by female prairie voles. Animal Behaviour, 39:768–774.
Tamarin, R. H. 1983. Animal population regulation through behavioral interactions. Pp. 698–720, in Advances in the study of animal behavior (J. F. Eisenberg and D. V. Kleiman, eds.). Special Publication, The American Society of Mammalogists, 7:1–753.
Tamarin, R. H.. 1988. The role of behavior in models of small rodent population dynamics. Oikos, 52:222–223.
Viitala, J. 1977. Social organization in cyclic subartic populations of the voles Clethrionomys rufocanus (Sund.) and Microtus agresrís (L.). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 14:53–93.
Viitala, J. 1987. Social organization of Clethrionomys rutilus (Pall.) at Kilpisjarvi, Finnish Lapland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 24:267–273.
Viitala, J., and I. Hoffmeyer. 1985. Social organization in Clethrionomys compared with Microtus and Apodemus: social odours, chemistry, and biological effects. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 22:359–371.
Waldman, B. 1987. Mechanisms of kin recognition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128:159–185.
Warkowska-Dratnal, H., and N. C. Stenseth. 1985. Dispersal and the microtine cycle: comparison of two hypotheses. Oecologia (Berlin), 65:468–477.
Wilson, S. C. 1982. The development of social behaviour between siblings and nonsiblings of the voles, Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour, 30:426–437.
Wolff, J. O. 1985. Behavior. Pp. 340–372, in Biology of New World Microtus. (R. H. Tamarin, ed.). Special Publication, The American Society of Mammalogists, 8:1–893.
Ylönen, H., and J. Viitala. 1987. Social organization and habitat use of introduced populations of the vole Clethrionomys rufocanus (Sund) in central Finland. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 52:354–363.
Ylönen, H., T. Kojola, and J. Viitala. 1988. Changing female spacing behaviour and demography in an enclosed breeding population of Clethrionomys glareolus. Holartic Ecology, 11:286–292.
Ylönen, H., T. Mappes, and J. Viitala. 1990. Different demography of friends and strangers: an experiment on the impact of kinship and familiarity in Clethrionomys glareolus. Oecologia (Berlin), 83:333–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferkin, M.H. (1990). Kin Recognition and Social Behavior in Microtine Rodents. In: Tamarin, R.H., Ostfeld, R.S., Pugh, S.R., Bujalska, G. (eds) Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles. Advances in Life Sciences. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6416-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6416-9_2
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-2437-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-6416-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive