Skip to main content

Abstract

The usual gliding hump method (e.g., for the proof of the uniform bounded-ness principle) consists in a succesive selection of a subsequence {nk} of indices, to obtain certain resonance properties. In this note it is shown that under appropriate additional assumptions one may even select a geometrical subsequence, i.e., nk = Mk for some well-determined natural M. Thus, in constrast to a sucessive selection, this method has the advantages of a constructive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brass, H., Der Wertebereich des Trapezverfahrens. In: Hämmerlin, G., ed., Numerische Inteqration. (ISNM, vol. 45) Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 1979, pp. 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dickmeis, W., Ein quantitatives Resonanzprinzip und Schärfe von punktweisen Fehlerabschätzunger, fast überall (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dickmeis, W. — Nessel, R.J., Quantitative Prinzipien gleichmäßiger Beschränktheit und Schärfe von Fehlerabschätzungen. (Forschungsberichte des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen 3117) Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickmeis, W. — Nessel, R.J., Condensation principles with rates. Studia Math. 75 (1982), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickmeis, W. — Nessel, R.J., On condensation principles with rates. II. In: Sendov, Bl. — et al., Constructive Function Theory’81. Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia 1983, pp. 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dickmeis, W. — Nessel, R.J. — van Wickeren, E., On the sharpness of estimates in terms of averages. Math. Nachr. (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feinermann, R.P. — Newman, D.J., Polynomial Approximation. William & Wilkins, Baltimore 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hedstrom, G.W., The rate of convergence of some difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5 (1968), 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Timan, A.F., Theory of Approximation of Functions. Pergamon Press, New York 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dickmeis, W. (1984). A Remark on Quantitative Gliding Hump Methods. In: Butzer, P.L., Stens, R.L., Sz.-Nagy, B. (eds) Anniversary Volume on Approximation Theory and Functional Analysis. ISNM 65: International Series of Numerical Mathematics / Internationale Schriftenreihe zur Numerischen Mathematik / Série internationale d’Analyse numérique, vol 65. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5432-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5432-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-5434-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-5432-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics