Skip to main content

Abstract

Very often a manager is faced with decisions involving many goals such as pollution, cost, risk, etc. He is then looking for a solution which gives him the highest satisfaction possible regarding all of the goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubin, J.P. “Closest Efficient Decisions to the Shadow Minimum of a Multiobjec- tive Problem”, Working paper 72–6 European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, February 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benayoun, R, de Montglofier, J, Terguy J, and Larichev O. Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: Step Model (STEM), Mathematical Programming, December, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charles, A.M. Exterior branching algorithm: a proof of convergence. Cahiers de Mathematiques de la Decision no 7218. Universite de Paris IX-Dau- phine.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dyer, J.S. “Interactive Goal Programming”, Management Science, September 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geoffrion, A. “Vector Maximal Decomposition Programming”, Working Paper no 164, UCLA, September 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naslund, B. “A Method for Solving Multi-Criteria Problems”, Working paper 72–8 European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, February 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naslund, B. and Sellstedt, B. The Implementation and Use of Models for RandD Planning Research Policy, Vol. 2, no 1, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roy, B. “Problems and Methods with Multiple Objective Functions”, Mathematical Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bowman, V.J. “On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multiple-Criteria Objectives”, Paper presented at the conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, May 21–23, 1975, at Jouy-en-Josas, France.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roy, B. “Problems and Methods with Multiple Objective Functions”, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 1, No. 2, (November, 1971), pp. 239-266.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zionts, S. “Linear and Integer Programming II, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zionts, S., and Wallenius, J. “An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem”, Working Paper 74–10, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels, Revised March 1975. Forthcoming in Management Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aubin, JP., Naslund, B., Zionts, S. (1978). Multiple Criteria Optimisation. In: Bunn, D.W., Thomas, H. (eds) Formal Methods in Policy Formulation. Interdisciplinary Systems Research / Interdisziplinäre Systemforschung. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5288-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5288-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-0971-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-5288-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics