Abstract
The social experience of risk has been the focus of many studies. The perception of risk among the general public is a rather complex phenomenon that cannot be described on the basis of a single theory or model. The major accomplishment in the psychological research was the discovery of the qualitative risk characteristics and the semantic images that serve as heuristic tools for classifying and evaluating risk sources or activities. Sociological research has been essential in pointing out the organizational constraints of risk behavior as well as the mobilization potential of risk issues with respect to the allocation of social resources and the experienced inequities of benefit-risk distributions. The relative weights of these factors in evaluating risks depend on social and cultural factors. In contrast to studies on risk perception and attitudes, behavioral responses to risk have triggered less interest in the research communities despite the fact that the correlation between attitudes and behavior is normally weak. Several recent studies include trust and credibility, social values, and political mobilization as predictors for risk responses. The recently suggested metaphor of social amplification may provide an umbrella to integrate perception and response studies and to improve the predictive capability of social models of risk experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, F. W. (1987). Towards a holistic appreciation of risk: the challenge for communicators and policymakers. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12(3/4), 138–143.
Beck, U. (1986). Die Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt/ Main: Suhrkamp.
Bradbury, J. A. (1989). The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14, 380–399.
Clarke, L. (1989). Acceptable Risk: Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Covello, V. T. (1983). The perception of technological risks: a literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23, 285–297.
Dietz, T., Stern, P. C. and Rycroft, R. W. (1989). Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: the case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum, 4, 47–69.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: Concepts of Pollution of Taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
Douglas, M. and Wildaysky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Douglas, M. (1985). Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Durkheim, E. (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press (orig. 1893 ).
Evers, A. und Nowotny, H. (1987). Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Technical and democratic values in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 9 (3), 293–299.
Fischhoff, B. (1985). Managing risk perceptions. Issues in Science and Technology, 2 (1), 83–96.
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L. and Keeney, R. L. (1981). Acceptable Risk. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Fischhoff, B., Watson, S. R. and Hope, C. (1984). Defining Risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123–129.
Gould, L. C., Gardner, G. T., DeLuca, D. R., Tiemann, A., Doob, L. W. and Stolwijk, J. A. J. (1988). Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a Rational Society. London: Heinemann.
Heimer, C. (1988). Social structure, psychology, and the estimation of risk. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 491–519.
Johnson, B. B. (1987). The environmentalist movement and grip/group analysis: A modest critique. In: V. T. Covello and B. B. Johnson (Eds), The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk (pp. 147–178 ). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Jungermann, H. und Slovic, P. (1993). Charakteristika individueller Risikowahrnehmung. In: Bayerische Rückversicherung (Ed.), Risiko ist ein Konstrukt (pp. 89–107 ), München: Knesebeck.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
Kasperson, R. E. and Kasperson, J. X. (1983). Determining the acceptability of risk: ethical and policy issues. In: J. T. Rogers and D. V. Bates (Eds), Assessment and Perception of Risk to Human Health. Conference Proceedings (pp. 135–155 ), Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X. and Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8, 177–187.
Klages, H. (1984). Wertorientierungen im Wandel. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Kitschelt, H. (1980). Kernenergiepolitik. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Lipset, S. M. and Schneider, W. (1983). The Confidence Gap, Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: The Free Press.
Lopes, L. L. (1983). Some thoughts on the psychological concept of risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 137–144.
Lowi, T. J. (1964). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.
Luce, R. D. and Weber, E. U. (1986). An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188–205.
Luhmann, N. (1973). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: Enke, 2. Auflage.
Luhmann, N. (1980). Trust and Power. New York: Wiley.
Luhmann, N. (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, N., (1990). Technology, environment, and social risk: a systems perspective. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4, 223–231.
Markowitz, J. (1991). Kommunikation über Risiken: Eine Problemskizze. Manuscript, University of Bielefeld: Bielefeld.
National Research Council, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy of Sciences. Washington: National Academy Press.
Nelkin, D. (1982). Blunders in the business of risk. Nature, 298, 775–776.
O’Riordan, T. (1983). The cognitive and political dimension of risk analysis. Environmental Psychology, 3, 345–354.
Otway, H. and Thomas, K. (1982). Reflections on risk perception and policy. Risk Analysis, 2, 69–82.
Parsons, T. E. (1960). Pattern variables revisited. American Sociological Review, 25, 467483.
Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, E. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
Pollatsek, A. and Tversky, A. (1970). A theory of risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 540–553.
Rayner, S. (1987). Risk and relativism in science for policy. In: V. T. Covello and B. B. Johnson (Eds), The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk (pp. 5–23 ), Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rayner, S. and Cantor, R. (1987). How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Analysis, 7, 3–13.
Renn, O. (1986). Akzeptanzforschung: Technik in der gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzung. Chemie in unserer Zeit, 2, 44–52.
Renn, O. (1990). Risk perception and risk management: a review. Risk Abstracts, 7(1/2).
Renn, O. (1991). Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: R. Kasperson and P. J. Stallen (Eds), Communicating Risk to the Public (pp. 287–324 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Renn, O. (1992a). The social arena concept of risk debates. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Eds), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 170–197 ), Westport, CT: Praeger.
Renn, O. (1992b). Concepts of risk: a classification. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Eds), Social Theories of Risk (pp. 53–79 ), Westport, CT: Praeger.
Renn, 0., Webler, T. and Johnson, B. (1991). Citizen participation for hazard management. Risk–Issues in Health and Safety, 3, 12–22.
Renn, O. and Levine, D. (1991). Trust and credibility in risk communication. In: R. Kasperson and P. J. Stallen (Eds), Communicating Risk to the Public (pp. 175–218 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Renn, 0., Burns, W., Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X. and Slovic, P. (1992). The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical application. Social Issues, 48(4), 137–160.
Ross, L. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 10 (pp. 173–220 ). New York: Random House.
Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Thomas, K., Maurer, D., Fishbein, M., Otway, H. J., Hinkle, R. and Simpson, D. A. (1980). Comparative Study of Public Beliefs about Five Energy Systems. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Report 80–15, Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.
Thompson, M. (1980). An Outline of the Cultural theory of Risk, Working Paper of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), WP-80–177, Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA.
Thompson, M., Ellis, W. and Wildaysky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
Short, J. F. (1984). The social fabric of risk: toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American Sociological Review, 9, 711–725.
Short, J. F. (1989). On defining, describing, and explaining elephants (and reactions to them): hazards, disasters, and risk analysis. Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 7, 397–418.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1981). Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. In: Royal Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the Royal Society, A376 (pp. 17–34 ), London: Royal Society.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk, Science, 236, 280–285.
Vlek, C. A. J. and Stallen, P. J. (1981). Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235–271.
Wildaysky, A. and Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why? Daedalus. 119(4), 41–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renn, O. (1995). Individual and Social Perception of Risk. In: Fuhrer, U. (eds) Ökologisches Handeln als sozialer Prozess. Themenhefte. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5045-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5045-2_3
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-5167-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-5045-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive