Boethius on the Square of Opposition

Part of the Studies in Universal Logic book series (SUL)

Abstract

This article intends to reconstruct the textual tradition of the square of oppositions from the earliest textual sources just as treated in Boethius’ commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione and his treatises on syllogistic, De syllogismo categorico and Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. The research discovers two different tracks. One way comes from Plato’s Sophist and Aristotle’s De Interpretatione, and the aim is to distinguish contrariety from contradiction. The second influence also starts from Aristotle, but now in connection with his Prior Analytics and its commentaries and treatises on categorical syllogistic, where the aim is to show the square as one of the three main chapters of the complete theory of categorical logic. I suggest that this double ingredient has accompanied the development of the square from the very original beginning of logic.

Keywords

Categorical logic Square of oppositions Logical/material truths Tradition of commentaries and treatises on Aristotelian logic Theory of oppositions 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03-02 03B65 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander of Aphrodisias: Alexandri in Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum Librum I Commentarium. Wallies, M. (ed.). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 2.1. Berlin (1883) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander of Aphrodisias: Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Topicorum Libros Octo Commentaria. Wallies, M. (ed.). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 2.2. Berlin (1891) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ammonius: Ammonius in Aristotelis Analyticorum Priorum Librum I Commentarium. Wallies, M. (ed.). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.6. Berlin (1890) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ammonius: Ammonii In Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius. Busse, A. (ed.) Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 4.6. Berlin (1895) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Annas, J.: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Books M and N. Oxford (1976) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Apuleius: Apulei Opera Quae Supersunt, vol. 3. Apulei Platonici Madaurensis de Philosophia Libri, Liber PERI ERMENEIAΣ. Thomas, P. (ed.). Teubner, Leipzig (1908) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aristotle: Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A revised text with introduction and commentary by Ross, W.D. Oxford University, Oxford (1924) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aristotle: Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.). Oxford (1949) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aristotle: Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. A revised text with introduction and commentary by Ross, W.D. Clarendon, Oxford (1949) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aristotle: La Métaphysique. Translation with notes by Tricot, J., vols. i–ii. Paris (1962) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aristotle: Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translation with notes by Ackrill, J.L. Oxford (1963) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aubenque, P.: Le Problème de l’être chez Aristotle, 5th edn. Paris (1983) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnes, J.: Logical form and logical matter. In: Alberti, A. (ed.) Logica, Mente e Persona. Studi sulla filosofia antica, p. 79. Florence (1990) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berti, E.: Quelques remarques sur la conception Aristotélicienne du Non-être. Rev. Philos. Anc. I, 115–142 (1983) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blank, D.: Ammonius on Aristotle on Interpretation 1–8. Translation with notes in: Sorabji, R. (ed.) Ancient Commentators of Aristotle. London (1996) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boethius: Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii Commentarii in Librum Aristotelis PERI ERMHNEIAS, prima et secunda editio. Meiser, C. (ed.). Leipzig (1877–1880) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boethius: De Hypotheticis Syllogismis. Obertello, L. (ed.). Paideia Editrice, Brescia (1969) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boethius: Anicii Manlii Seuerini Boethii De syllogismo categorico. Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (ed.). A critical edition with introduction, translation, notes and indexes. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, vol. LXVIII. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, University of Gothenburg (2008) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boethius: Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (ed.). A critical edition with introduction, commentary and indexes. Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia, vol. LXIX. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, University of Gothenburg (2008) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cherniss, H.: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, vol. I. Baltimore (1944) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Correia, M.: Es lo mismo ser no-justo que ser injusto? Aristóteles y sus comentaristas. Méthexis. Int. J. Anc. Philos. XIX, 41–56 (2006) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Correia, M.: The syllogistic theory of Boethius. Anc. Philos. 29, 391–405 (2009) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Rijk, L.: On the chronology of Boethius’ works on logic (I and II). Vivarium 2(1–2), 1–49 and 122–162 (1964) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee, T.-S.: Die grieschische Tradition der aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Späntantike, eine Untersuchung über die Kommentare zu den Analytica Priora von Alexander Aphrodisiensis, Ammonius und Philoponus. Hypomnemata, vol. 79. Göttingen (1984) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Philoponus, J.: Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Analytica Priora. Wallies, M. (ed.). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, vol. 13.1–2. Berlin (1905) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plato: Opera Omnia. Volume I: Euthyphro, Apologia, Crito, Phaedo, Cratylus, Theaetetus, Sophista, Politicus. Recognivit brevique adnotatione critica instruxerunt. Duke, E.A., Hicken, W.F., Nicoll, W.S.M., Robinson, D.B., Strachan, J.C.G. Clarendon, Oxford (1995) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reale, G.: Aristotele. Metafisica, vols. i, ii, iii. Milan (1993) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shiel, J.: Boethius’ commentaries on Aristotle. In: [29], pp. 349–372. Text originally in: Medieval and Renaissance Studies, vol. 4, pp. 217–244 (1958) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sorabji, R. (ed.): Aristotle Transformed. The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. London (1990) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sullivan, M.W.: Apuleian Logic. The Nature, Sources and Influence of Apuleius’s Peri Hermeneias. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967) MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thrax, D.: Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem Grammaticam. Hilgard, A. (ed.). Grammatici Graeci 1, 3. Teubner, Leipzig (1901) Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zimmermann, F.W.: Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s de Interpretatione. Translation, introduction and notes. Oxford (1991) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de FilosofíaPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiago de ChileChile

Personalised recommendations