The Right Square

Part of the Studies in Universal Logic book series (SUL)


It is shown that there is a way of interpreting the traditional Square of Opposition that overcomes the main historic problem that led to the present supremacy of modern predicate logic over Aristotelian Syllogistic: handing multiply quantificational, relational expressions like ‘All boys love some girls’. The interpretation has other advantages, is plausibly Aristotle’s own, original view, and was certainly known by several significant Aristotelian logicians in the late nineteenth century, and the early part of the twentieth century, when Syllogistic was falling from favour. That leads to a puzzle about why the proposed interpretation was not seen to overcome the problem of multiple generality at the time, and some points are made showing what might need to change before the interpretation is more widely accepted.


Square of Opposition Conditional probability Logically proper names Epsilon terms 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03A05 03B48 03B10 


  1. 1.
    Bartley, W.W. III (ed.): Lewis Carroll’s Symbolic Logic. C.N. Potter, New York (1977) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prior, A.N.: Formal Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962) MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Russell, B.: On denoting. Mind 14, 479–493 (1905) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Russell, B., Whitehead, A.N.: Principia Mathematica. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1910) MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slater, B.H.: Hilbert’s epsilon calculus and its successors. In: Gabbay, D., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 5. Elsevier, Burlington (2009) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strawson, P.F.: Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen, London (1952) MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thompson, M.: On Aristotle’s square of opposition. Philos. Rev. 62, 251–265 (1953) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations