Abstract
We consider professional service providers, such as lawyers and physicians, who essentially work independently, but share an office or clinic. They need to jointly cover recurring fixed costs, like rent and staff wages, in every period. It is often argued that such costs should be allocated based on usage of the facilities. A more quantifiable indirect indicator of usage is the revenues. As partners’ revenues fluctuate over time, it is plausible to require, as we do in this study, that their shares in the fixed costs fluctuate accordingly. Had partners’ revenues not fluctuated, the deterministic cost allocation problem would be mathematically equivalent to the bankruptcy problem. Ours is a dynamic stochastic model of cost allocation for which we examine some ex-ante mechanisms based on partners’ portions of total revenue. Monotonicity, proportionality, and other properties of the suggested mechanisms are studied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Requiring \(E\left({P}_{i}^{(n)}\right)=E\left(\frac{{X}_{i}}{\sum_{j=1}^{n}{X}_{j}}\right){C}^{(n)}\) is also a possibility.
- 2.
Not surprisingly, many partnerships just allocate fixed costs at a constant ratio, even equally, regardless of actual usage of facilities in that period.
References
Young, H.P.: Cost Allocation. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.), vol. 2, pp. 1193–235. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam (1994)
Carlin, A., Park, R.E.: Marginal Cost Pricing of Airport Runway Capacity. Am. Econ. Rev. 60(3), 310–319 (1970)
Littlechild, S.C., Thompson, G.F.: Aircraft landing fees: a game theory approach. Bell J. Econ. 8(1),186–204 (1977). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2307/3003493
O'Neill, B.: A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math. Soc. Sci. 2(4), 345–371 (1982). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(82)90029-4
Aumann, R.J., Maschler, M.: Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J. Econ. Theory 36(2),195–213 (1985). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4
Thomson, W.: Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update. Math. Soc. Sci. 74, 41–59 (2015). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.09.002
Ertemel, S., Kumar, R.: Proportional rules for state contingent claims. Inter. J. Game Theory 47(1),229–46 (2018). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-017-0585-7
Xue, J.: Fair division with uncertain needs. Soc. Choice Welfare 51(1), 105–36 (2018). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1109-5
Guajardo, M., Rönnqvist, M.: A review on cost allocation methods in collaborative transportation. Inter. Trans. Operational Res. 23, 371–92 (2016). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12205
Billera, L.J., Heath, D.C.: Allocation of shared costs: a set of axioms yielding a unique procedure. Math. Oper. Res. 7(1), 32–39 (1982)
Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N.: Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York (1994)
Wikipedia: Dirichlet distribution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_distribution, (Accessed 19 Jan 2022)
Wikipedia: Gamma distribution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution, (Accessed 19 Jan 2022)
Young, H.P.: Cost Allocation: Methods, Principles. Applications. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ms. Michaella Gerchak for editorial support.
Disclosure of Interests.
No funding was received for conducting this study.
The authors declare no competing interests relevant to the contents of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khmelnitsky, E., Gerchak, Y. (2024). Allocation of Recurring Fixed Costs According to Partners’ Varying Revenues in Professional Services. In: Campos Ferreira, M., Wachowicz, T., Zaraté, P., Maemura, Y. (eds) Human-Centric Decision and Negotiation Support for Societal Transitions. GDN 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 509. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59372-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59373-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)