Skip to main content

Allocation of Recurring Fixed Costs According to Partners’ Varying Revenues in Professional Services

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Centric Decision and Negotiation Support for Societal Transitions (GDN 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 509))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

We consider professional service providers, such as lawyers and physicians, who essentially work independently, but share an office or clinic. They need to jointly cover recurring fixed costs, like rent and staff wages, in every period. It is often argued that such costs should be allocated based on usage of the facilities. A more quantifiable indirect indicator of usage is the revenues. As partners’ revenues fluctuate over time, it is plausible to require, as we do in this study, that their shares in the fixed costs fluctuate accordingly. Had partners’ revenues not fluctuated, the deterministic cost allocation problem would be mathematically equivalent to the bankruptcy problem. Ours is a dynamic stochastic model of cost allocation for which we examine some ex-ante mechanisms based on partners’ portions of total revenue. Monotonicity, proportionality, and other properties of the suggested mechanisms are studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Requiring \(E\left({P}_{i}^{(n)}\right)=E\left(\frac{{X}_{i}}{\sum_{j=1}^{n}{X}_{j}}\right){C}^{(n)}\) is also a possibility.

  2. 2.

    Not surprisingly, many partnerships just allocate fixed costs at a constant ratio, even equally, regardless of actual usage of facilities in that period.

References

  1. Young, H.P.: Cost Allocation. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.), vol. 2, pp. 1193–235. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlin, A., Park, R.E.: Marginal Cost Pricing of Airport Runway Capacity. Am. Econ. Rev. 60(3), 310–319 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Littlechild, S.C., Thompson, G.F.: Aircraft landing fees: a game theory approach. Bell J. Econ. 8(1),186–204 (1977). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.2307/3003493

  4. O'Neill, B.: A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math. Soc. Sci. 2(4), 345–371 (1982). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(82)90029-4

  5. Aumann, R.J., Maschler, M.: Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J. Econ. Theory 36(2),195–213 (1985). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4

  6. Thomson, W.: Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update. Math. Soc. Sci. 74, 41–59 (2015). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.09.002

  7. Ertemel, S., Kumar, R.: Proportional rules for state contingent claims. Inter. J. Game Theory 47(1),229–46 (2018). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-017-0585-7

  8. Xue, J.: Fair division with uncertain needs. Soc. Choice Welfare 51(1), 105–36 (2018). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1109-5

  9. Guajardo, M., Rönnqvist, M.: A review on cost allocation methods in collaborative transportation. Inter. Trans. Operational Res. 23, 371–92 (2016). https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12205

  10. Billera, L.J., Heath, D.C.: Allocation of shared costs: a set of axioms yielding a unique procedure. Math. Oper. Res. 7(1), 32–39 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N.: Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 1,  2nd ed. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wikipedia: Dirichlet distribution.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_distribution, (Accessed 19 Jan 2022)

  13. Wikipedia: Gamma distribution.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution, (Accessed 19 Jan 2022)

  14. Young, H.P.: Cost Allocation: Methods, Principles. Applications. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Michaella Gerchak for editorial support.

Disclosure of Interests.

No funding was received for conducting this study.

The authors declare no competing interests relevant to the contents of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yigal Gerchak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khmelnitsky, E., Gerchak, Y. (2024). Allocation of Recurring Fixed Costs According to Partners’ Varying Revenues in Professional Services. In: Campos Ferreira, M., Wachowicz, T., Zaraté, P., Maemura, Y. (eds) Human-Centric Decision and Negotiation Support for Societal Transitions. GDN 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 509. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59373-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59372-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59373-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics