Skip to main content

Accuracy and Repeatability of a Parallel Robot for Personalised Minimally Invasive Surgery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics (RAAD 2024)

Abstract

The paper presents the methodology used for accuracy and repeatability measurements of the experimental model of a parallel robot developed for surgical applications. The experimental setup uses a motion tracking system (for accuracy) and a high precision measuring arm for position (for repeatability). The accuracy was obtained by comparing the trajectory data from the experimental measurement with a baseline trajectory defined with the kinematic models of the parallel robotic system. The repeatability was experimentally determined by moving (repeatedly) the robot platform in predefined points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, S., et al.: Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study. J. Int. Med. Res. 50(10), 3000605221128153 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisla, D., et al.: Safety issues in the development of an innovative medical parallel robot used in renal single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J. Clin. Med. 12(14), 4617 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kiblawi, R., et al.: Laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery: three decades of comparative studies. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 32, 9–25 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antoniou, S.A., et al.: Past, present, and future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS. 19(3) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pisla, D., el al.: Algebraic modeling of kinematics and singularities for a prostate biopsy parallel robot. Proc. Rom. Acad. Ser. A 19, 489–497 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cepolina, F., et al.: An introductory review of robotically assisted surgical systems. Int. J. Med. Robot. 18(4), e2409 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pisla, D., et al.: Kinematical analysis and design of a new surgical parallel robot. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Kinematics, pp. 273–282. Duisburg, Germany (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leal, G.T., et al.: 30 years of robotic surgery. World J. Surg. 40(10):2550–7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Low, S.C., et al.: A review of master–slave robotic systems for surgery. Int. J. Humanoid Rob. 03(04), 547–567 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pisla, D., et al.: Singularity analysis and geometric optimization of a 6-DOF parallel robot for SILS. Machines 10(9), 764 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pusca, A., et al.: On the development of an innovative surgical parallel robotic system. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on E-Health and Bioengineering Nov. 2023-in press (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koivukangas, T., et al.: Accuracy assessment phantom for surgical devices. In: 2010 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference, pp. 57–60. Cairo, Egypt (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pisla, D., et al.: On the accuracy assessment of a parallel robot for the minimally invasive cancer treatment. J. Eng. Sci. Innov. Z-ASTR 2023-in press (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pop, G.M., et al.: On the association of datums and measurements using conventional measuring devices—topics within the GPS toolbox project. In: Majstorovic, V., Durakbasa, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th—IMEKOTC14, pp. 209–216 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tarnita, D., et al.: Applications of nonlinear dynamics to human knee movement on plane & inclined treadmill. New Trends in Med. and Service Robots, vol. 39, pp. 59–73. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarnita, D., et al.: Contributions on the modeling and simulation of the human knee joint with applications to the robotic structures, pp. 283–297 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vaida, C., et al.: Development of a control system for a parallel robot used in minimally invasive surgery. IFMBE Proc. 2009(26), 171–176 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisla, D., et al.: Design and functional analysis of a new parallel modular robotic system for single incision laparoscopic surgery. In: New Trends in Medical and Service Robotics. MESROB 2023. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 133. Springer (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ameler, T., et al.: A comparative evaluation of SteamVR tracking and the OptiTrack system for medical device tracking. In: 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE-EMBC, pp. 1465–1470. Berlin, Germany (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO 21748:2017 Guidance for the Use of Repeatability, Reproducibility and Trueness Estimates in Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferguson, J.M., et al.: Comparing the accuracy of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and automation. Int. J. Med. Robot. 16(6):1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Podsędkowski, L., et al.: Quality in medicine. Polish J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 1(1), 90–101 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project New smart and adaptive robotics solutions for personalized minimally invasive surgery in cancer treatment—ATHENA, funded by European Union—NextGenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no. 760072/23.05.2023, code CF 116/15.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, investment I8 and by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-2790 694PED—Enhance, within PNCDI III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bogdan Gherman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pisla, D. et al. (2024). Accuracy and Repeatability of a Parallel Robot for Personalised Minimally Invasive Surgery. In: Pisla, D., Carbone, G., Condurache, D., Vaida, C. (eds) Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics. RAAD 2024. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 157. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59257-7_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics