Skip to main content

About the Debate Around New Technologies and Old People

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family Ties and Psychosocial Processes in an Ageing Society

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Aging ((Int. Perspect. Aging,volume 42))

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

As computers become an increasingly integral part of the lives of older adults, the study of computer used by older adults is becoming an increasingly relevant field of study. The aim of the study is a bibliographic review to better understand the relationship of new technologies with the population of older adults. One of the consequences that appears is that to encourage and facilitate the use of new technologies by this important age group, for both personal and professional benefit, it is necessary to understand its implication in the term of cultural traditions. It should be noted that all the researches consulted insist on the increasingly important role of the new technologies in the life of old people, and far from assuming that ageing people would have a rejection to the same, is possible to perceptive an operative and surprising use of the new technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Adler, R. (1996). Older adults and computers. http://www.sEniornet.org/php/default.php?PageID=5476yVersion=0yFont=0

  • Alexy, E. M. (2000). Computers and caregiving: Reaching out and redesigning interventions for homebound older adults and caregivers. Holistic Nursing Practice. 14(4). 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpass, F. M. & Neville, S. (2003). Loneliness, health, and depression in older males. Aging and Mental Health. 7(3). 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) (1996). Understanding senior housing into the next century: Survey of consumer preferences, concerns, and needs. Washington: American Association of Retired Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) (2008). Healthy @ home. Washington: American Association of Retired Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, M. M., Maas, I., Wilms, H. U., Borchelt, M. & Little, T. D. (1999). Everyday competence in old and very old age: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings (pp. 384–402) In P. B. Baltes y K. U. Mayer (Eds.). The Berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, J. J. & Schmidt, H. G. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor model. Computers in Human Behavior. 17, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. & Phillips, J. (2000). The challenge of ageing in tomorrow’s Britain. Ageing and Society. 20, 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binotti, P., Spina, D., Barrera, M. & Donolo, D. (2009). Funciones ejecutivas y aprendizaje en el envejecimiento normal. Estimulación cognitiva desde una mirada psicopedagógica. Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología. 4(2),119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdi, K. S. & Zapf, D. (1997). Age differences in reactions to errors in computer-based Work. Behaviour y Information Technology. 16(6), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, S. & Meléndez, J. (2006). Cambios en la memoria asociados al Envejecimiento. Revista Iberoamericana de Gerontología y Geriatría, 22, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predTIC success. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayfield, C. (2000). Rise of thesilver surfers. The Times, 37, 125–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur, A. Renold, C. & Henke, M. (1999). How do older netcitizens compare with their younger counterparts? Cyberpsychology y Behavior, 2(6), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, D. (2001). Digital divide or tool for understanding and collaboration: Computers and intergenerational relationships. 54th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of Americas. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calero, M. D. (2003). La utilidad de los programas de intervención cognitiva en personas mayores. Revista Iberoamericana de Gerontología y Geriatría, 38(6). 305–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. J. (2008). Meeting seniors’ information needs: Using computer Technology. Home Health Care Management y Practice. 20(4), 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerda, A. (2005). Alfabetización digital en el Adulto Mayor: ¿En el camino de la inclusión social?. http://www.archivochile.com/tesis/09_tedulit/09tedulit0016.pdf

  • Cerella, J., Poon, L. W. & Williams, D. M. (1980). Age and the complexity hypothesis (pp. 332–340). In L. W. Poon (Ed.). Aging in the 1980s. Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M; Dunn, D; Hoppin, S. & Wendt, P. (1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating Internet use among older adult learners. Communication Education. 48 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. (2001). Guiding seniors. Internet. 64(2), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (1985). Psychosocial implications of sex differences in attitudes towards computers: Result of a survey. International Journal of Women’s Studies. 8(3), 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, I. (2000). Introduction: Technological challenges for gerontologists in the 21st century. Educational Gerontology. 26(4), 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N., Schumann, C. E. & Boritz, G. M. (1992). Training older adults in word processing: Effects of age, training technique, and computer anxiety. International Journal of Technology and Aging. 5, 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaja, S. J., Hammond, K., Blascovich, J. J. & Swede, H. (1989). Age related differences in learning to use a text-editing system. Behaviour and Information Technology. 8, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davicino, N., Muñoz, M., Barrera, M. & Donolo, D. (2009). El rol psicopedagógico en la estimulación cognitiva de pacientes con demencia tipo Alzheimer Revista Chilena de Neuropsicología. 4(1), 06–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorin, M. (2007). Online education of older adults and its relation to life satisfaction. Educational Gerontology. 33(2), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukes, R. L., Discenza, R. & Couger, J. D. (1989). Convergent validity of four computer anxiety scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, J. L. & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 10, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan. D. E., & Bowers. C. (1988). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predTIC success. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum. 24(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festervand, T. A. & Meinert, D. B. (1994). Older adults’ attitudes toward and adoption of personal computers and computer-based lifestyle assistance Journal of Applied Business Research. 10(2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, T. S., et al. (2005). The costs associated with adverse drug events among older adults in the ambulatory setting. Medical Care. 43(12), 1171–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, K. E., Smith, M. A. & Freese, J. (2006) When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? Findings from the Wisconsin longitudinal study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 21(12), 1295–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garamendi, F., Delgado, D. & Amaya, A. (2010). Programa de Entrenamiento cognitivo en adultos mayores. Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación. 22, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, F. D. & Desai, H. B. (1986). Computer anxiety: Sex, race and age. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 25, 711–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, L. M., Egan, D. E. & Bowers, C. (1986). Learning to use a text editor: Some learner characteristics that predict success. Human-Computer Interaction. 2, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. & McAdams, D. (2003). The souls of digital black folks: A narrative study of digitally fluent African-Americans. American Educational Research Association Annuals Conference. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, P. (2002). The numbers game: Older people and the media. London: Independent Television Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, K. V., McElro, J. C. & Morrow, P. C. (1990). Computer anxiety and computer based training: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 6, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T., Chaparro, B. & Halcomb, C. (2008). Evaluating websites for older adults: Adherence to senior-friendly guidelines and end-user performance. Behaviour y Information Technology. 27(3), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, D. (2000). Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers. 12(5),507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R. & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior. 3, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helander, M. G. (Ed) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Geografía e Informática (2005). Estadísticas sobre disponibilidad y uso de tecnología deinformación y comunicación en los hogares. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/modutih/2005/

  • Irizarry, C. & Downing, A. (1997). Computers Enhancing the lives of older people. Australian Journal on Ageing. 16(4). 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. M., Vollmer, L. & Stuurman, J. (1985). Effects of attitude and task complexity on microcomputer text-editing. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 12, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara, M. (2008). La estimulación cognitiva dn personas adultas mayores. Revista Cúpula. 22(2). 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2009). Nuevas formas de relacionamiento abuelos-nietos adolescentes desde los cambios demográficos-sociales actuales. Psicología Revista, 18 (1), 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2013). Promesa extingida o promesa En estado de fluido. Continuidades y discontinuidades de los adultos mayores hoy. Revista Psicologia & Sociedade 25(1), 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knufer, N. N. (1997). Gender by design. Educational Technology. 37(2), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohang, A. A. (1989). A study of attitudes toward computers: Anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 22, 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooij, D., de Lange, A., Jansen, P. & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age, a conceptual review. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(4), 364–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawhorn, T., Ennis, D., & Lawhorn, D. C. (1996). Seniors adults and computers in the 1900’s. Educational Gerontology. 22(2),193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loges, W. & Jung, J. (2001). Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age Communication Research. 28(4), 536–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. H. & Gressard, C. (1984). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal. 17, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. & Noble, G. (2002). Mine/not mine: Appropriating personal computers in the academic workplace. Journal of Sociology. 38(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias, W. & McMillan, S. (2008). The return of the house call: The role of internet-based interactivity in bringing health information home to older adults. Health Communications. 23(1), 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. & Savage, S. (2000). Some economic and social aspects of residential Internet use in Australia. Journal of Media Economics. 13(3), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C., Belchior, P., Tomita, M. R. & Kemp, B. J. (2005). Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. Technology and Disability. 17(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides, G. A. (1988). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer Achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 4 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. & Mackay, H. (Eds). Information technology and society. Londres: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massoud, S. L. (1991). Computer attitudes and computer knowledge of adult students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 7, 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Dyck, J. L. & Vilberg, W. (1986). Learning to program and learning to think: What’s the connection? Communications of the ACM. 29, 605–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMellon, C. A. & Schiffman, L. G. (2000). Cybersenior mobility: Why some older consumers may be adopting the Internet. Advances in Consumer Research. 27(1), 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMellon, C. A. & Schiffman, L. G. (2002). Cybersenior empowerment: How some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 21(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melenhorst, A. S., Rogers, W. A., & Bouwhuis, D. G. (2006). Older adults’ motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging. 21(1), 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monthly Labor Review (2008). Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, R. W., Mayhorn, C. B. & Bennett, J. (2000). A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults Human Factors. 42(2), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P., Prell, E., & McElroy, J. (1986). Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of computer anxiety. Psychological Reports. 59, 1199–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. (2002). Tackling the digital divide: Evidence and intervention. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency seminar. The Digital Divide. Coventry. Warwickshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, J. C. & Prates, A. E. (2020). A aprendizagem mediada pelo uso de tecnologias digitais na concepção dos docentes: um estudo de caso no curso técnico em edificações do Instituto Federal de Educação. Ciência e Tecnologia do Norte de Minas Gerais - IFNMG/Campus Januária. Research. Society and Development. 9(8), e515985692

    Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. London: Coronet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord, G. D., McCubbins, T. F., & Nord, J. H. (2006). E-monitoring in the workplace, privacy, legislation, and surveillance software. Communications of the ACM. 49(8), 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogozalek, V. Z. (1991). The Social impacts of computing: Computer technology and the graying of America. Social Science Computer Review. 9(4), 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opalinski, L. (2001). Older adults and the digital divide: Assessing results of a web based Survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 18(3), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puig, A. (2000) Un instrumento eficaz para prevenir el deterioro cognitivo de los ancianos institucionalizados: El Programa de Psicoestimulación Preventiva (PPP). Revista Multidisciplinaria de Gerontología. 10(3). 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., Kestenbaum, M., Neustadtl, A. & Alvarez, A. (2000). Mass media use and social life among Internet users. Social Science Computer Review. 18(4), 490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E., & Shoemaker, F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. L. (2008). Older computer-literate women: Their motivations, obstacles, and paths to success. Educational Gerontology. 34(7), 610–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, E. B. & Heaven, R. K. (1986). Promoting vitality among older adults with computers. Activities, Adaptation y Aging. 8(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E. J. (2004). Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior Centers. Educational Gerontology. 30(7), 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills?. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 7, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Santana, Carla da. (2015) Elderly Users’ Perspective on the Use of Technology in Daily Life: A Comparative Study of a sample in the UK and Brazil. Inteligencia Artificial 18(55), 35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taiuani Marquine, R. et al. (2016) Percepção de idosos acerca das novas tecnologias. Inteligencia Artificial 18(55), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tak, S. H. & Hong, S. H. (2005). Use of the internet for health information by older adults with arthritis Orthopaedic Nursing. 24(2), 134–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, L. & Gavillet, M. (1990). The development of computer confidence in seniors: An assessment of changes in computer anxiety and computer literacy activities. Adaptation y Aging. 14(3), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2000). Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 11(2), 125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The global information technology report (2014) Rewards and Risks of Big Data. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalInformationTechnology_Report_2014.pdf

  • Thayer, S. E. & Ray, S. (2006). Online communication preferences across age, gender, and duration of internet use Cyberpsychology y Behavior. 9(4). 432–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. Turner, S. & Van de Walle, G. (2007). How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour and Information Technology. 26(4), 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2000). The 65 years and over population. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-10.pdf [5th June. 2015]

  • US Census Bureau (2003). Use of a computer at home, school, or work and the Internet at any location for people 18 years and over by selected characteristics. http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/computer/2003/tab05B.xls

  • US Department of Labor (2008). Older workers. https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2008/older_workers

  • Van der Veer, G. C. (1989). Individual differences and the user interface. Ergonomics. 32, 1431–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuori, S., Holmlund-Rytkönen, M. (2005). 55+ people as internet users. Marketing Intelligence y Planning. 23(1), 58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt, K. (2000). Viewing ambivalence from a sociological perspective: Implications for psychotherapists. Psychotherapy. 37(4), 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. et al. (1999). Surfing the net in later life: A review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life Journal of Applied Gerontology. 18(3), 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. & Weatherall, A. (2000). A grounded theory analysis of older adults and information technology. Educational Gerontology. 26(4), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. et al. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing Internet training and access to older adults. Aging and Mental Health. 6(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1973). Situational relevance. Information Storage and Retrieval. 9, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. (1972). Realidad y Juego. Madrid: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, J. E. J. (1991) A comparison of four computer attitude scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 7, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1996). Technologies as cultural artefacts. In: W. Dutton (ED) Information and communication technologies (pp. 87–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolrych, R. (2016) Ageing and technology: creating environments to support an ageing society (keynote). Gerontechnology, 15 (2), 65–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuni, J. & Urbano, C. (2005). Educación de adultos mayores: Teoría. investigación e Intervenciones. Buenos Aires: Brujas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamarrón, M., Tárraga, L. & Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2008). Plasticidad cognitiva en personas con la enfermedad de Alzheimer que reciben programas de estimulación cognitiva Psicothema. 20(3), 432–437.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klein, A. (2024). About the Debate Around New Technologies and Old People. In: Family Ties and Psychosocial Processes in an Ageing Society. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59076-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59076-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-59075-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-59076-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics